Chest
Volume 111, Issue 5, May 1997, Pages 1414-1416
Journal home page for Chest

Special Report
Cigarette Smoking and Lung Cancer Trends: A Light at the End of the Tunnel?

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.111.5.1414Get rights and content

Objective

To update the epidemic curves for lung cancer in the United States by gender in relation to the temporal trends in adult current cigarette smoking prevalence.

Methods

The design of the study was ecologic, based on population figures. Available data on the prevalence of current cigarette smoking from 1920 to 1990 were plotted in conjunction with age-adjusted lung cancer mortality rates from 1930 to 1992 for each sex.

Results

There was a strong temporal relationship between the curves for cigarette smoking prevalence and lung cancer mortality rate with approximately a 30-year population latency period in both men and women. The curves occurred later in women than in men. The lung cancer rate in men peaked in 1990 and then began to decline while the rate in women continued to rise.

Conclusion

The temporal association between cigarette smoking prevalence and lung cancer mortality provides additional support for the causal relationship between smoking and lung cancer.

Section snippets

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cigarette smoking prevalence for US men and women aged 18 years and older in percent were obtained from two survey sources: (1) data published by Burbank3 for 1920 to 1960, and (2) data published by Giovino et al4 for 1965 to 1990. The percentages were plotted at 5-year intervals up to 1990.

Curves for annual lung cancer age-adjusted mortality rates (per 100,000) by sex from 1930 to 1992 were recently published by Parker et al.5 The exact rates were obtained (S. Parker, personal communication,

RESULTS

The curves for men are shown in Figure 1. The prevalence of current cigarette smokers was estimated to be 46% in 1920 and rose steadily to 65% in 1940, plateaued until 1955, and then began to decline progressively, reaching 28% in 1990.

The male lung cancer mortality rate was only 4.9/100,000/yr in 1930, rose slowly at first, and then more rapidly until 1980. Thereafter it slowed and peaked at 75.6 in 1990. The rate then fell to 74.6 in 1991 (not shown) and 73.1 in 1992. The population latency

DISCUSSION

Cigarette smoking prevalence estimates from 1955 on were based on national probability samples. The data prior to 1955 may not be as reliable. Estimates for men were based on annual marketing surveys by the Milwaukee Journal in its metropolitan area. Therefore the sample may not be representative of all US men. However, Burbank3 found that there was good agreement with national surveys beginning in 1955 and therefore used a straight line approximation for the early data. Milwaukee estimates for

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The author is grateful to Sheryl L. Parker, MSPH, Surveillance Research Group, American Cancer Society, for providing the age-adjusted lung cancer mortality rates in the United States, 1930 to 1992.

REFERENCES (12)

  • BurbankF.

    US lung cancer death rates begin to rise proportionately more rapidly for females than for males: a dose-response effect?

    J Chron Dis

    (1972)
  • Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare

    Public Health Service publication

    (1964)
  • HillA.B.

    The environment and disease: association or causation

    Proc R Soc Med

    (1965)
  • GiovinoG.A. et al.

    Surveillance for selected tobacco-use behaviors—United States, 1900-1994

    MMWR

    (1994)
  • ParkerS.L. et al.

    Cancer statistics, 1996

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (1996)
  • GiovinoG.A. et al.

    Epidemiology of tobacco use and dependence

    Epidemiol Rev

    (1995)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (71)

  • Cell phone use and the risk of glioma: are case-control study findings consistent with Canadian time trends in cancer incidence?

    2021, Environmental Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The examination of cancer incidence patterns at the population level can yield important clues about suspected etiological factors. As an illustration, patterns of cigarette smoking and lung cancer mortality rates in the 20th century provided valuable insights about lung cancer risks associated with tobacco smoking, including information about the latent period required for the induction of lung cancer (Weiss, 1997). The IARC has highlighted that, in some circumstances, ecological studies are informative for assessing human carcinogens particularly when exposures can be measured accurately at a population level (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2019).

  • Tobacco and marijuana use and their association with serum prostate-specific antigen levels among African American men in Chicago

    2020, Preventive Medicine Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    Cigarette smoking increases the risk of aggressive prostate cancer (Kenfield et al., 2011; Huncharek et al., 2010)and may increase incident prostate cancer among those who smoke the most (Huncharek et al., 2010). Temporal latency periods for cigarette smoking have been well-established for lung cancer trends (i.e., higher risk in older age groups) (Weiss, 1997 May) and may have relevance for prostate cancer risk. However, a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) that included 18.6% AA men observed an inverse association between current or former smokers and PSA levels.

  • A National Cancer Database Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Early-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

    2018, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Tobacco use is an important negative predictor of OS in NSCLC and has historically shaped mortality trends for men and women. Lung cancer mortality rates in men have peaked and are currently downtrending, reflecting the increase and decrease in male smoking prevalence (24–26). Women started smoking later than men and were slower to quit, resulting in a more recent peak in lung cancer mortality.

  • Epidemiology and Trend of Prognosis in Cancer Patients

    2017, Anticancer Treatments and Cardiotoxicity: Mechanisms, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions
  • Cancer burden in four countries of the Middle East Cancer Consortium (Cyprus; Jordan; Israel; Izmir (Turkey)) with comparison to the United States surveillance; epidemiology and end results program

    2016, Cancer Epidemiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    There is generally a good correlation of male to female smoking ratios with ratios of lung cancer in males and females in all four Middle East countries, except for Izmir where it has the highest male to female ratio for lung cancer (8.6) while the male to female smoking rate ratio is only 3.0. This observation may be associated with the latency period of at least 20 years that is generally required for smoking to cause lung cancer [15,16]. Hence not only women in the Middle East countries have taken up smoking overall at a lower rate than men, it is also likely that they have taken up smoking at a later stage chronologically (more recently), and it is likely that lung cancer rates in women especially in Izmir will increase in the future.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text