Mini-Review
Home hygiene: a risk approach

https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00193Get rights and content

Abstract

The need to place “prevention through hygiene” at the core of strategies for infection prevention has been emphasised by recent events. Indications are that re-evaluation of current practice and the promotion of improved hygiene in the domestic setting could have a significant impact in reducing infectious disease. If the public are to play a part however they must be properly informed. Encouraging the concept of the home as a setting in which the whole range of activities occur, including food hygiene, personal hygiene and hygiene related to medical care, provides the opportunity for a rational approach to home hygiene based on risk assessment. In the home surfaces (including hand surfaces) and other sites play an important part in the transmission of infection, especially food-borne infections. From an assessment of the frequency of occurrence of pathogens and potential pathogens at reservoirs, disseminators and hand and food contact sites together with the potential for transfer within the home, the risks of exposure can be assessed. This can be used to develop a rational approach in which effective hygiene procedures involving cleaning and disinfection as appropriate are targeted at these sites to reduce risks of cross contamination. This approach is consistent with the view that good home hygiene is not about “getting rid of household germs” but about targeting hygiene measures appropriately to reduce exposure to germs and thereby prevent cross infection. In motivating change, education programmes must take account of concerns related to antimicrobial resistance, the environment and the “health” of the immune system.

References (48)

  • Anonyme

    BMA submission to the Lords Select Committee into antimicrobial resistance

    (1997)
  • Anonyme

    Official Journal of the European Communities

    (1999)
  • J. Barker et al.

    Survival of Salmonella in bathrooms and toilets in domestic homes following salmonellosis

    J. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2000)
  • S.F. Bloomfield

    Significance of biocide usage and antimicrobial resistance in domiciliary environments

    J. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • S.F. Bloomfield et al.

    Cross-contamination and infection in the domestic environment and the role of chemical disinfectants

    J. Appl. Microbiol.

    (1997)
  • T.A. Cogan et al.

    The effectiveness of hygiene procedures for prevention of cross-contamination from chicken carcasses in the domestic kitchen

    Lett. Appl. Microbiol.

    (1999)
  • T.A. Cogan et al.

    Achieving hygiene in the domestic kitchen: the effectiveness of commonly used cleaning procedures

    J. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • R.B. Couch

    Rhinoviruses

  • Curtis, V.: The dangers of dirt: Household hygiene and health. PhD Thesis, University of Wageningen,...
  • Eccles, R.: International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene. Spread of common colds and influenza. World Wide Web....
  • H.S. Evans et al.

    General outbreaks of infectious intestinal disease in England and Wales 1995 and 1996

    Comm. Dis. Public Health

    (1998)
  • FSA.: Salmonella in retail chicken drops to an all time low but the battle with campylobacter continues....
  • J.O. Hendley et al.

    Transmission of rhinovirus colds by self inoculation

    New. Engl. J. Med.

    (1973)
  • Hernandez, G., Mangas, I., de Mateo, S., Liacer, A., Eiman, M., Sanchez-Serrano, L. P.: Foodborne disease outbreaks in...
  • Cited by (26)

    • Contamination of knives and graters by bacterial foodborne pathogens during slicing and grating of produce

      2015, Food Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the case of food, cross-contamination of foodborne pathogens is a major concern as it increases the risk for humans to ingest contaminated food and become ill. Unfortunately, many consumers have little awareness that domestic food contact surfaces and utensils are considered a contributing factor to transmission and the occurrence of sporadic foodborne disease (Bloomfield, 2003; Pérez-Rodríguez et al., 2008). Evidence to support such a role is based on epidemiological data from Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand that infers that a substantial proportion of foodborne disease is attributable to improper food preparation practices in consumers' homes (Redmond and Griffith, 2003).

    • Attachment and biofilm formation by foodborne bacteria in meat processing environments: Causes, implications, role of bacterial interactions and control by alternative novel methods

      2014, Meat Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interestingly, the UK surveillance system reported that cross-contamination was the main contributing factor (32%) in the outbreaks investigated in the period 1999–2000 (WHO, 2003). To this direction, various authors have also acknowledged that cross-contamination of foods by bacterial pathogens in homes and in food-service establishments is an important cause of transmission of foodborne diseases (Beumer & Kusumaningrum, 2003; Bloomfield, 2003; Chen et al., 2001). Cross-contamination may occur at any stage between the food (meat) processing plant and the final consumer at home (Reij et al., 2004).

    • Meat handlers training in Portugal: A survey on knowledge and practice

      2011, Food Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, although most outbreaks result from extensive growth at abusive storage temperatures, insufficient cooking, etc., many are also associated with bacterial cross contamination/recontamination (Notermans, Zwietering, & Mead, 1994; Roberts, 1990). Similarly, various authors have stated that cross contamination of bacterial and viral pathogens in homes and in food-service establishments could well be the major contributing factor to sporadic and epidemic food borne illnesses (Beumer & Kusumaningrum, 2003; Bloomfield, 2003; Chen, Jackson, Chea, & Schaffner, 2001). In the present study, a high proportion of respondents admits a potentially dangerous behaviour on a daily basis, as 56.8% (n = 88) recognise the need to change their clothes but do not admit the importance of changing knives when they end the work at the abattoir and start at the deboning room.

    • Understanding and modelling bacterial transfer to foods: a review

      2008, Trends in Food Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Regarding the porosity of surfaces, it can be observed that porous surfaces (clothes, aprons, sponges, etc.) show lower transfer rates when compared to non-porous surfaces (stainless steel, knobs, etc.) (Kusumaningrum et al., 2002; Rusin et al., 2002; Scott & Bloomfield, 1990). However, in this case, although apparently lower risk might be associated to transfer from fabrics, it should also be noted that the residual water accumulated in clothes and sponges would enable bacteria to survive for longer periods, and consequently, bacterial transfer events could also be prolonged (Bloomfield, 2003). Besides this, corrosion and scratches (consequence of repeated use and cleaning) are other factors that influence bacterial transfer, since major corrosion or scratches on surfaces facilitate the accumulation of biofouling where bacteria can be embedded or trapped, thereby resulting in lower bacterial numbers available for transfer.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text