Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Variability of environmental exposures to volatile organic compounds

Abstract

Although studies of occupational exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) often partition variability across groups, and between and within persons, those of environmental exposure to VOCs have not involved such partitioning. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency's total exposure assessment methodology (TEAM) studies, we partitioned exposure variability across cities, and between and within persons for nine VOCs. The estimated variance components decreased in the order: within-person > between-person > across city. Despite their smaller magnitudes, estimates of between-person and across-city variance components were sufficiently large to provide reasonable contrast for informative epidemiology studies of most VOCs. Estimates of between-person variance components for environmental VOCs were similar to those published for occupational VOCs (groups defined by job and factory). However, estimates of within-person variance components were much greater for environmental VOCs, probably due to the greater diversity of locations (including the workplace) visited by the general public over time. For benzene and perchloroethylene, we used a simple model to calculate numbers of personal measurements required to relate the exposure level to health outcome statistically. About 10 times more personal measurements would be required to investigate perchloroethylene exposure as compared to benzene exposure; this disparity reflects the greater within-subject variability of perchloroethylene data compared to benzene data. We conclude that variability should be partitioned for environmental VOC exposures in much the same manner as for occupational exposures. There should be sufficient variability in the levels of most VOCs across cities and between subjects to provide reasonable contrast for informative epidemiology studies, as we illustrate for exposures to benzene. Yet, epidemiologists should be wary of investigating environmental VOCs without preliminary data with which to estimate the variance structure of exposure variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The following VOCs were investigated: benzene, chloroform, ethylbenzene, methylchloroform, p-dichlorobenzene, perchloroethylene, styrene, trichloroethylene, and o-xylene.

  2. The following VOCs were reported by Kromhout et al.: benzene, diphenyl, diphenylether, ethanal, formaldehyde, an unspecified organic vapor, perchloroethylene, styrene, toluene, total solvents, trichloroethane, and xylene.

  3. The VOCs routinely measured above detection limits were 1,3-butadiene, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, p-, m-, and o-xylene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, styrene, p-isopropyltoluene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, p-dichlorobenzene, and naphthalene. Sampled locations included homes, offices, restaurants, pubs, department stores, cinemas, perfume shops, libraries, laboratories, train stations, trafficked roads, cars, trains, and buses.

References

  • Armstrong B.G . Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med 1998: 55(10): 651–656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brunekreef B., Noy D., and Clausing P . Variability of exposure measurements in environmental epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 1987: 125(5): 892–898.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burstyn I., Boffetta P., Burr G.A., Cenni A., Knecht U., Sciarra G., et al. Validity of empirical models of exposure in asphalt paving. Occup Environ Med 2002: 59(9): 620–624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burstyn I., Boffetta P., Kauppinen T., Heikkila P., Svane O., Partanen T., et al. Performance of different exposure assessment approaches in a study of bitumen fume exposure and lung cancer mortality. Am J Ind Med 2003a: 43(1): 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burstyn I., Boffetta P., Kauppinen T., Heikkila P., Svane O., Partanen T., et al. Estimating exposures in the asphalt industry for an international epidemiological cohort study of cancer risk. Am J Ind Med 2003b: 43(1): 3–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egeghy P.P., Nylander-French L., Gwin K.K., Hertz-Picciotto I., Rappaport S.M . Self-collected breath sampling for monitoring low-level benzene exposures among automobile mechanics. Ann Occup Hyg 2002: 46(5): 489–500.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egeghy P.P., Tornero-Velez R., and Rappaport SM . Environmental and biological monitoring of benzene during self-service automobile refueling. Environ Health Perspect 2000: 108(12): 1195–1202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann K., Krause C., Seifert B., and Ullrich D . The German Environmental Survey 1990/92 (GerES II): sources of personal exposure to volatile organic compounds. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 2000: 10(2): 115–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen N.A., Hoek G., Harssema H., and Brunekreef B . Childhood exposure to PM10: relation between personal, classroom, and outdoor concentrations. Occup Environ Med 1997: 54(12): 888–894.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen N.A., Hoek G., Harssema H., and Brunekreef B . Personal sampling of airborne particles: method performance and data quality. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 1998: 8(1): 37–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen N.A., Hoek G., Harssema H., and Brunekreef B . Personal exposure to fine particles in children correlates closely with ambient fine particles. Arch Environ Health 1999: 54(2): 95–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y.M., Harrad S., and Harrison R.M . Concentrations and sources of VOCs in urban domestic and public microenvironments. Environ Sci Technol 2001: 35(6): 997–1004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney P.L., Chillrud S.N., Ramstrom S., Ross J., and Spengler J.D . Exposures to multiple air toxics in New York City. Environ Health Perspect 2002: 110 (Suppl. 4): 539–546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kromhout H., and Heederik D . Occupational epidemiology in the rubber industry: implications of exposure variability. Am J Ind Med 1995: 27(2): 171–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kromhout H., Swuste P., and Boleij J.S . Empirical modelling of chemical exposure in the rubber-manufacturing industry. Ann Occup Hyg 1994: 38(1): 3–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kromhout H., Symanski E., and Rappaport S.M . A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. Ann Occup Hyg 1993: 37(3): 253–270.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kromhout H., and van Tongeren M . How important is personal exposure assessment in the epidemiology of air pollutants? Occup Environ Med 2003: 60(2): 143–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liljelind I.E., Rappaport S.M., Levin J.O., Stromback A.E., Sunesson A.L., and Jarvholm B.G . Comparison of self-assessment and expert assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals. Scand J Work Environ Health 2001: 27(5): 311–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liljelind I.E., Stromback A.E., Jarvholm B., Levin J.O., Strangert B.L., and Sunesson A.-L.K . Self-assessment of exposure: a pilot study of assessment of exposure to benzene in tank truck drivers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2000: 15: 195–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navidi W., and Lurmann F . Measurement error in air pollution exposure assessment. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 1995: 5(2): 111–124.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navidi W., Thomas D., Stram D., and Peters J . Design and analysis of multilevel analytic studies with applications to a study of air pollution. Environ Health Perspect 1994: 102 (Suppl. 8): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz C., Goldberg P., Kahan E., Grady S., and Goren A . The variability of exposure over time: a prospective longitudinal study. Ann Occup Hyg 1997: 41(4): 485–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz C., Goren A., Smid T., and Kromhout H . Application of mixed-effects models for exposure assessment. Ann Occup Hyg 2002: 46(1): 69–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport SM . Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. Ann Occup Hyg 1991: 35(1): 61–121.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport S.M., Waidyanatha S., Qu Q., Shore R., Jin X., Cohen B., et al. Albumin adducts of benzene oxide and 1,4-benzoquinone as measures of human benzene metabolism. Cancer Res 2002: 62(5): 1330–1337.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport S.M., Weaver M., Taylor D., Kupper L., and Susi P . Application of mixed models to assess exposures monitored by construction workers during hot processes. Ann Occup Hyg 1999: 43(7): 457–469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rijnders E., Janssen N.A., van Vliet P.H., and Brunekreef B . Personal and outdoor nitrogen dioxide concentrations in relation to degree of urbanization and traffic density. Environ Health Perspect 2001: 109 (Suppl. 3): 411–417.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood R.J., and Greenhalgh D.M.S . A personal air sampler. Ann Occup Hyg 1960: 2: 127–132.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spengler J., Schwab M., Ryan P.B., Colome S., Wilson A.L., Billick I., et al. Personal exposure to nitrogen dioxide in the Los Angeles Basin. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 1994: 44(1): 39–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelman D., McDermott A., and Rosner B . Regression calibration method for correcting measurement-error bias in nutritional epidemiology. Am J Clin Nutr 1997: 65 (Suppl. 4): 1179S–1186S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Symanski E., Chan W., and Chang C.C . Mixed-effects models for the evaluation of long-term trends in exposure levels with an example from the nickel industry. Ann Occup Hyg 2001: 45(1): 71–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Symanski E., Kupper L.L., Kromhout H., and Rappaport S.M . An investigation of systematic changes in occupational exposure. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1996: 57(8): 724–735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tielemans E., Heederik D., Burdorf A., Vermeulen R., Veulemans H., Kromhout H., et al. Assessment of occupational exposures in a general population: comparison of different methods. Occup Environ Med 1999: 56(3): 145–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tielemans E., Kupper L.L., Kromhout H., Heederik D., and Houba R . Individual-based and group-based occupational exposure assessment: some equations to evaluate different strategies. Ann Occup Hyg 1998: 42(2): 115–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Tongeren M., Gardiner K., Calvert I., Kromhout H., and Harrington J.M . Efficiency of different grouping schemes for dust exposure in the European carbon black respiratory morbidity study. Occup Environ Med 1997: 54(10): 714–719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L., Nelson W., Ziegenfus R., Pellizzari E., Michael L., Whitmore R., et al. The Los Angeles TEAM Study: personal exposures, indoor-outdoor air concentrations, and breath concentrations of 25 volatile organic compounds. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 1991: 1(2): 157–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L.A . The Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (TEAM) Study: Summary and Analysis: Volume I. Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L.A . Personal exposure to 25 volatile organic compounds. EPA's 1987 team study in Los Angeles, California. Toxicol Ind Health 1991: 7(5–6): 203–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L.A . Human exposure to volatile organic pollutants: implications for indoor air studies. Annu Rev Energy Environ 2001: 26: 269–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace L.A., Pellizzari E.D., Hartwell T.D., Whitmore R.W., Zelon H., Perritt R., et al. The California TEAM study: breath concentrations and personal exposures to 26 volatile compounds in air and drinking water of 188 residents of Los Angeles, Antioch, and Pittsburgh, CA. Atmos Environ 1988: 22(10): 2141–2163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeger S.L., Thomas D., Dominici F., Samet J.M., Schwartz J., Dockery D., et al. Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences. Environ Health Perspect 2000: 108(5): 419–426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences through Grants P42ES05948 and P30ES10126. The authors appreciate the assistance of Dr. Peter Egeghy in downloading data from EPA's online database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M Rappaport.

Appendices

Appendix A

Samples of data obtained from the TEAM database, providing personal and outdoor air concentrations, day and night, for nine VOCs are summarized in Table A1

Table a1 Samples of data obtained from the TEAM database, providing personal and outdoor air concentrations, day and night, for nine VOCs.

Appendix B

Derivation of a relationship to predict sample sizes

Assume exposure Model (1) with kh=k subjects in the hth city (h=1, 2, …, H>3) and nhi=n measurements/subject), and assume that each person is assigned his/her city's observed mean (log-scale) exposure

(since μyhi is unobservable in Model (4)), where

is the observed (log-scale) mean exposure for the ith person in the hth city. Then the unweighted least-squares estimator of β1 in Model (4), using a group-based analysis, is

where

and

Using relationships given by Tielemans et al. (1998), we can show that the expected value of θ̂*1 is E(θ̂*1)=cβ1, where

and where σα2, σB2, and σW2 are defined under Model (1). Also the standard error of θ̂*1 has the form:

Using the above relationships for E(θ̂1*) and SE(θ̂1*) and assuming the variance components σ2e, σ2α, σ2B, and σ2W are known (a standard assumption for such sample size derivations), a 100(1−α)% large-sample approximate confidence interval for θ1 is

Assuming θ1>0 (indicating an adverse effect of exposure on the health outcome), we seek choices for H(>3), k, and n (≥2) satisfying the following inequality:

where (1−β) is the smallest probability we would accept for the event that the lower limit of the confidence interval exceeds zero. For large samples, we equivalently have

where Z is approximately a standard normal deviate. Hence, we require

leading to

After substituting for c and SE(β̂*1), we obtain

After some manipulation, this leads to Eq. (5) in the text.

Appendix C

Statistics for VOC concentrations (μg/m3) from 24-h personal measurements in five US cities (1981–1987) are summarized in Table C1.

Table 7 Summary statistics for VOC concentrations (μg/m3) from 24-h personal measurements in five US cities (1981–1987).

Appendix D

Statistics for VOC concentrations (μg/m3) from 24-h outdoor measurements in five US cities (1981–1987) are summarized in Table D1.

Table a3 Summary statistics for VOC concentrations (μg/m3) from 24-h outdoor measurements in five US cities (1981–1987).

Appendix E

Spearman's correlation coefficients for 24-h personal measurements of nine VOCs in five US cities are summarized in Table E1. See Appendix A for nominal sample sizes

Table 9 Spearman's correlation coefficients for 24-h personal measurements of nine VOCs in five US cities.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rappaport, S., Kupper, L. Variability of environmental exposures to volatile organic compounds. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 14, 92–107 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500309

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500309

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links