Skip to main content
Log in

Associations between infections and fatigue in a Dutch working population: Results of the Maastricht Cohort Study on Fatigue at Work

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between fatigue and common infections was further explored, as part of a 3 year prospective cohort study on Fatigue at Work. The current study is based on seven successive questionnaires, covering the first 2 years of follow-up. The overall response at baseline was 45% (n = 12,140). On T1 10,592 (87.2% compared to baseline response) employees returned the questionnaire. For T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6, 10,270 (84.6%), 9655 (79.5%), 8956 (73.8%), 8692 (71.6%) and 8070 (66.5%) employees respectively returned the questionnaire. Self-administered questionnaires were used to determine the level of fatigue with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) and the occurrence of common cold, flu-like illness and gastroenteritis. Regression analysis using generalized estimated equations (GEE) were used for data analysis. We found a cross-sectional relationship between fatigue and the infections flu-like illness and gastroenteritis, and a longitudinal relationship between an infection as a predictor of fatigue. For fatigue as a predictor of an infection, we found odds ratios (ORs) of 1.35 (confidence interval (CI) 1.28–1.42) for flu-like illness and 1.33 (CI: 1.25–1.42) for gastroenteritis. The highest incidence of infections was found among employees who reported high fatigue levels on two successive occasions. The increased incidence of infections, is regarded as a substantial effect of fatigue because it is associated with significant absenteeism from work and leads to discomfort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. David A, Pelosi A, McDonald E, et al. Tired, weak, or in needof rest: Fatigue among general practice attenders (see comments). Br Med J 1990; 301(6762): 1199–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Rijk AE, Schreurs KM, Bensing JM. What is behind ‘I'm so tired’? Fatigue experiences and their relations tothe quality and quantity of external stimulation. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47(6): 509–523.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tiesinga LJ, Dassen TW, Halfens RJ. Fatigue: A summary of the definitions, dimensions, and indicators. Nurs Diagn 1996; 7(2): 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Addington AM, Gallo JJ, Ford DE, Eaton WW. Epidemiology of unexplained fatigue and major depression in the community: The Baltimore ECA follow-up, 1981–1994. Psychol Med 2001; 31(6): 1037–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bültmann U, De Vries M, Beurskens AJHM, Bleijenberg G, Vercoulen JHMM, Kant Y. Measurement of long-term fatigue at work in the Maastricht Cohort Study: Determination of a cutoff point. J Occup Health Psychol 2000; 5(4): 411–416.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, et al. The chronic fatigue syndrome: A comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med1994; 121:953–959.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kant I, Beurskens AJHM, Schröer CAP, et al. De Maastrichtse cohort studie naar langdurige psychische vermoeidheid in de arbeidssituatie (The Maastricht Cohort Study on fatigue at work). Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs-en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde 2000; 8(8): 226–232.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen MK. The epidemiology of self-perceived fatigue among adults. Prev Med 1986; 15(1): 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wessely S, Chalder T, Hirsch S, Pawlikowska T, Wallace P, Wright DJ. Postinfectious fatigue: Prospective cohort study in primary care (see comments). Lancet 1995; 345(8961): 1333–1338.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cope H, David A, Pelosi A, Mann A. Predictors of chronic ‘postviral’ fatigue (see comments). Lancet 1994; 344(8926): 864–868.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hotopf M, Noah N, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue and minor psychiatric morbidity after viral meningitis: A controlled study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1996; 60(5): 504–509.

    Google Scholar 

  12. White PD, Thomas JM, Amess J, Grover SA, Kangro HO, Clare AW. The existence of a fatigue syndrome after glandular fever. Psychol Med 1995; 25(5): 907–916.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hall SR, Smith AP. Behavioural e.ects of infectious mononucleosis. Neuropsychobiology 1996; 33(4): 202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cope H, David A, Mann A. ‘Maybe it's a virus’?: Beliefs about viruses, symptom attributional style and psychological health. J Psychosom Res 1994; 38(2): 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen S, Tyrrell DA, Smith AP. Negative life events, perceivedstress, negative affect, and susceptibility to the common cold. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993; 64(1): 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beurskens AJ, Bultmann U, Kant I, Vercoulen JH, Bleijenberg G, Swaen GM. Fatigue among working people: Validity of a questionnaire measure. Occup Environ Med2000; 57(5): 353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bültmann U, Kant I, Kasl SV, Beurskens AJHM, Van den Brandt PA. Fatigue and psychological distress in the working population: Psychometrics, prevalence, andcorrelates. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52(6): 445–452.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vercoulen JH, Hommes OR, Swanink CM, et al. The measurement of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. A multidimensional comparison with patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy subjects. Arch Neurol 1996; 53(7): 642–649.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Prognosis in chronic fatigue syndrome: A prospective study on the natural course. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1996; 60(5): 489–494.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer W, Bleijenberg G. Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res 1994; 38(5): 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal analysis using generalizedlinear models. Biometrika 1986; 73: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986; 42(1): 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mohren DCL, Swaen GMH, Borm PJA, Bast A, Galama JMD. Psychological job demands as a risk factor for common coldin a Dutch working population. J Psychosom Res 2001; 50: 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Buültmann U, Kant I, Van den Brandt PA, Kasl SV. Psychosocial work characteristics as risk factors for the onset of fatigue andpsychological distress: Prospective results from the Maastricht Cohort Study.Psychol Med2002; 32: 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith A, Thomas M, Borysiewicz L, Llewelyn M. Chronic fatigue syndrome and susceptibility to upper respiratory tract illness. Br J Health Psychol 1999; 4(Pt 4): 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Straus S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. In: Rosen S (ed.), Medicine for the Public. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health, 1996; 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kuiper JI, Van der Beek AJ, Meijman TF. Psychosomatic complaints and unwinding of sympathoadrenal activation after work. Stress Med1998; 14(1): 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  28. White PD. The relationship between infection and fatigue (editorial). J Psychosom Res 1997; 43(4): 345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Benjamin JE, Hoyt RC. Disability following postvaccinal (yellow fever) heaptitis: A study of 200 patients manifesting delayed convalescence. JAMA 1945; 128: 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lambore S, McSherry J, Kraus AS. Acute and chronic symptoms of mononucleosis. J Fam Pract 1991; 33(1): 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lepow ML, Coyne N, Thompson LB, Carver DH, Robbins FC. A clinical, epidemiological and laboratory investigation of aseptic meningitis during the fouryear period, 1955–1958. II. The clinical disease and its sequelae. N Eng J Med1962; 266: 1188–1193.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Muller R, Nylander I, Larsson LE, Widen L, Frankenhaeuser M. Sequelae of primary aseptic meningo-encepalitis. A clinical, sociomedical, electroencephalographic andpsychological study. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand1958; 33(Suppl 126): 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hotopf MH, Wessely S. Viruses, neurosis andfatigue (see comments). J Psychosom Res 1994; 38(6): 499–514.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen S, Tyrrell DA, Smith AP. Psychological stress andsusceptibility to the common cold. N Engl J Med 1991; 325(9): 606–612.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Watson D, Clark LA. Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychol Bull 1984; 96: 465–490.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mechanic D. The experience and reporting of common physical complaints. J Health Soc Behav 1980; 21(2): 146–155.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Macintyre S, Pritchard C. Comparisons between the self-assessed and observer-assessed presence and severity of colds. Soc Sci Med 1989; 29(11): 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Orts K, Sheridan JF, Robinson Whelen S, Glaser R, Malarkey WB, Kiecolt Glaser JK. The reliability and validity of a structured interview for the assessment of infectious illness symptoms. J Behav Med1995; 18(6): 517–529.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohren, D., Swaen, G., Kant, I. et al. Associations between infections and fatigue in a Dutch working population: Results of the Maastricht Cohort Study on Fatigue at Work. Eur J Epidemiol 17, 1081–1087 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021270924291

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021270924291

Navigation