US state- and county-level social capital in relation to obesity and physical inactivity: A multilevel, multivariable analysis
Introduction
In the 2001 report ‘A Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight and Obesity’, the US Surgeon General declared obesity to have reached epidemic proportions in America (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2001). Obesity results from a positive energy balance over time, when total energy intake (through food and/or drink) exceeds total energy expenditure (during work and/or leisure time). Several individual-level behavioral factors have been shown in prospective studies to predict weight gain or obesity, including the consumption of fast foods (Pereira et al., 2005) and sugar-sweetened beverages (Ludwig, Peterson, & Gortmaker, 2001; Schulze et al., 2004), television viewing, and low levels of leisure- or work-time physical activity (Hu, Li, Colditz, Willett, & Manson, 2003; Koh-Banerjee et al., 2003).
To explain the obesity epidemic, increasing attention has been focused on identifying contextual determinants (French, Story, & Jeffery, 2001; Hill & Peters, 1998; Nestle, 2003), with some recent evidence implicating the factors of urban sprawl and income inequality. In a multilevel analysis, Ewing, Schmid, Killingsworth, Zlot, and Raudenbush (2003) found modest yet significant associations between US county-level urban sprawl and diminished time spent walking and between urban sprawl and an increased risk of obesity in individuals. Chang and Christakis (2005) reported an inverse relation between higher metropolitan area-level income inequality and individual obesity risk, in contrast to prior studies which observed positive associations between higher state-level income inequality and overweight status (Kahn, Tatham, Pamuk, & Heath, 1998; Subramanian, Blakely, & Kawachi, 2003).
An unexplored but plausible contextual determinant of obesity is social capital. Social capital has been defined as the resources embedded in social structures which are accessed and/or mobilized in purposive actions (Lin, 2001). This and alternative definitions (e.g., Bourdieu, 1983; Coleman, 1988; Portes, 1998; Putnam, 2000) possess distinctions such as the extent to which social capital is viewed as an individual vs. collective attribute (Kawachi, Kim, Coutts, & Subramanian, 2004). Nevertheless, most versions encompass attitudinal/cognitive domains (e.g., perceived interpersonal trust, reciprocity), as well as behavioral/relational/structural components (e.g., civic participation, informal socializing, volunteering) (Subramanian, Kim, & Kawachi, 2002).
A growing number of studies have attempted to empirically link social capital to favorable health outcomes, both at the collective and individual levels (Kawachi et al., 2004). Proposed mechanisms by which social capital may contribute to better health include the diffusion of knowledge about health promotion, maintenance of healthy behavioral norms through informal social control, promotion of access to local services and amenities, and psychosocial processes which provide affective support and mutual respect (Kawachi & Berkman, 2000). For instance, drawing on the diffusion of innovations theory (Rogers, 2003), residents of high social capital neighborhoods in which exercise and healthy eating (e.g., the avoidance of sugar-sweetened beverages) are practiced among some residents may be more likely to adopt these beneficial behaviors through diffusion of knowledge about the behaviors within facilitative social structures. In one study, low individual social participation in one's community was strongly and significantly associated with leisure-time physical inactivity (Lindstrom, Moghaddassi, & Merlo, 2003). Furthermore, in a recent cross-sectional analysis among 807 adolescents living in the US Los Angeles County, neighborhood collective efficacy (i.e., the willingness to intervene for the common good, the measure of which included several items tapping into attitudinal/cognitive dimensions of social capital) was significantly inversely related to overweight status (Cohen, Finch, Bower, & Sastry, 2006).
While the proposed mechanisms for social capital operate primarily at the local/neighborhood level, it is conceivable that social capital at larger geographical scales (e.g., the county or state level) could also be relevant to population health outcomes. For example, US states higher on average in social capital may be better able to undertake collective action to combat population health threats, and to provide health-promoting public goods for its residents, such as health care. Statewide taxes on soft drinks and snack foods (Jacobson & Brownell, 2000) and policies involving the subsidization of municipal associations and clubs to provide opportunities for physical activity might plausibly be sequelae of social capital acting at the state level. The absence of effective public opposition to such policies could arguably be the result of low state-level social capital, in particular active political mobilization.
Social capital at larger scales might further directly influence local levels of social capital through policy-related mechanisms, including collective efforts to subsidize neighborhood associations to promote civic and social participation. It might also have contextual effects on individual levels of social capital through attitudinal/cognitive mechanisms. For instance, high-trusting and democratic state governmental institutions could conceivably increase public confidence in governmental institutions, which in turn may boost levels of interpersonal trust (Brehm & Rahn, 1997; Levi, 1996).
Urban sprawl may contribute to lower levels of social capital through reductions in time engaged in informal and formal social interactions (due to increased time spent in transit); rises in social segregation and social homogeneity; and disruptions in community boundedness, which may lead to lower levels of community investment by residents (Putnam, 2000). Meanwhile, income inequality has been hypothesized to affect health in part by eroding social cohesion through a widening of the gap between the rich and poor (Kawachi, 2000).
Importantly, the effects of social capital may not necessarily apply uniformly across population sub-groups. Norms of ideal body weight are known to vary across racial/ethnic groups (Caldwell, Brownell, & Wilfley, 1997; Chang & Christakis, 2005; Wilfley et al., 1996), such that some groups may be more resistant to contextual influences of social capital. Furthermore, several studies have found the associations of weight status with educational and occupational attainment to be stronger among women than men (Averett & Korenman, 1996; Gortmaker, Must, Perrin, Sobal, & Dietz, 1993; Sargent & Blanchflower, 1994). Women may face a higher social penalty for being overweight compared to men (Chang & Christakis, 2005), and may be more responsive to factors such as social capital contributing to bodily appearance and obesity.
In the present study, social capital at both the US state and county levels were explored as having possible contextual effects on individual obesity and leisure-time physical inactivity. Two-level analyses (with individuals nested within states) were conducted on the associations between state-level social capital and the risks of obesity and leisure-time physical inactivity among individuals. Three-level analyses (with individuals nested within counties, in turn nested within states) were also performed on the associations of county-level social capital with the same outcomes. Each analysis utilized individual-level data from the US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey, along with data from other surveys and administrative sources to construct contextual measures. In addition, the potential mediating role of social capital in the relations between urban sprawl and income inequality and obesity and physical inactivity, and the possible presence of differential social capital associations by gender and race/ethnicity, were examined.
Section snippets
Methods
All individual-level measures were obtained from the 2001 survey of the BRFSS, an annual telephone survey of persons aged 18 years and older conducted by state health departments in collaboration with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to estimate national and state-specific prevalences of behavioral risk factors (Remington et al., 1988). State-level measures were derived from the Roper Social and Political Trends Archive (for years 1990–1994), based on annual national
Results
After exclusions, there were 181,200 and 167,857 individuals across 48 US states (all states except Alaska and Hawaii) and the District of Columbia (DC) in the 2-level analyses for obesity and physical inactivity, respectively. Missing values in the outcome accounted for the smaller sample size for the physical inactivity analyses. For the 3-level analyses, there were 101,198 and 94,145 individuals nested within 413 counties, nested within 48 US states plus DC, for the obesity and physical
Discussion
This US-based study provides evidence consistent with modest protective effects of social capital on obesity and leisure-time physical inactivity with social capital measured at the state level, although less convincingly with it measured at the county level. Adjusting for a number of individual- and state-level covariables, being high on one or both state-level social capital scales vs. neither scale was associated with 7% and 14% lower relative odds of obesity and physical inactivity,
Conclusions
The key findings of this study offer some support for the promotion of social capital as a potential strategy for addressing the current obesity epidemic. While possible health benefits of county-level social capital cannot be ruled out, primarily due to measurement issues, initiatives that can build higher levels of attitudinal, informal socializing, and formal group participation dimensions of social capital across a state—such as through the subsidization of local clubs, volunteer
Acknowledgments
Dr. Kim is the recipient of a Postdoctoral Fellowship through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
References (44)
- et al.
Income inequality and weight status in US metropolitan areas
Social Science and Medicine
(2005) - et al.
Collective efficacy and obesity: the potential influence of social factors on health
Social Science and Medicine
(2006) - et al.
Are geographic regions with high income inequality associated with risk of abdominal weight gain?
Social Science and Medicine
(1998) - et al.
Prospective study of the association of changes in dietary intake, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and smoking with 9-y gain in waist circumference among 16,587 US men
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(2003) - et al.
Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: A prospective, observational analysis
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
Fast-food habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective analysis
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
Who you know, where you live: social capital, neighborhood and health
Social Science and Medicine
(2005) - et al.
The economic reality of the beauty myth
Journal of Human Resources
(1996) - et al.
Roper social and political trends data, 1973–1994
(2000)
Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital
American Journal of Political Science
1997 Census of Retail Trade
Relationship of weight, body dissatisfaction, and self-esteem in African American and white female dieters
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Social capital in the creation of human capital
American Journal of Sociology
Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity
American Journal of Health Promotion
Environmental influences on eating and physical activity
Annual Review of Public Health
Improved approximations for multilevel models with binary responses
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A
Social and economic consequences of overweight in adolescence and young adulthood
New England Journal of Medicine
Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic
Science
Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women
Journal of the American Medical Association
Small taxes on soft drinks and snack foods to promote health
American Journal of Public Health
Income inequality and health
Cited by (184)
Role of bariatric surgery in a COVID-19 era: a review of economic costs
2021, Surgery for Obesity and Related DiseasesPlace matters: Government capacity, community characteristics, and social capital across United States counties
2021, Journal of Public PolicyNeighborhood Social Environment and Body Mass Index: The Mediating Role of Mental Wellbeing
2023, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health