The effects of congestions tax on air quality and health
Introduction
Many cities have implemented congestion charging or low emission zones aiming at reducing traffic congestion and health impacts of traffic emissions. In Singapore traffic congestion was alleviated using first a manual Area licensing scheme starting in 1975 and subsequently an Electronic Road pricing system (ERS) from 1998 (Seik, 2000). London has a road charging zone around the city centre that recently was updated to cover a larger area. Several Norwegian cities charge drivers travelling with studded winter tires in order to reduce particle emissions due to road wear. In Rome, traffic is prohibited in the inner city on weekdays. Several cities in Europe have low emission zones. In several Swedish cities low emission zones apply to trucks and buses. Recently three German cities (Berlin, Hannover and Cologne) have applied a complete ban on all vehicles that have no catalysts or diesel particulate filters in zones of the city centres.
However, so far, there are very few papers on the quantitative effects of road pricing or low emission zones on air pollutant concentrations, population exposure and health. Beevers and Carslaw (2005) analyzed the air pollution impact of the London congestion charging. Road traffic data, combined with a traffic emission model, indicate that NOx and PM10 emissions have been reduced by about 12% in the charging zone. But the emissions have increased on the inner ring road. The overall impact on air quality and health was not assessed. To our knowledge there is only one earlier study (Tonne et al., 2008) that has assessed the effects of a charging scheme not only on traffic and emissions, but also on exposure concentrations and health. They used a combination of dispersion modelling and regression calculations to analyse the air pollution and mortality benefits of the London congestion charge scheme (CCS). They concluded that the CCS lead to reductions in concentrations, although modest across Greater London, but greater in the charging zone wards. Predicted health benefits in the charging zone wards were 183 years of life per 100 000 people assuming conditions would persist over 10 years. This paper describes the effects of a road charge system in Stockholm on emissions, levels of air pollutants, and health of the population.
Section snippets
Description of the road charging system
On June 2, 2003, Stockholm City Council proposed testing congestion charging of traffic – called “The Stockholm Trial”. On June 16, 2004 the Swedish Parliament adopted a law that made it possible to charge a congestion tax in Stockholm up to July 31, 2006. The Stockholm Trial consisted of three parts: extended public transport (16 new bus lines), congestion tax and more park-and-ride sites in the city and the county. The total public transport service was extended by 7% and the park-and-ride
Measurements and modelling of road traffic
The effect of the Stockholm Trial on road traffic was quantified in terms of traffic flow by counting vehicles and by calculating road use, i.e. the number of vehicle kilometres travelled in the area (e.g. Baradaran et al., 2006, Forsman et al., 2006). Congestion was quantified in terms of journey times obtained from floating car measurements or from traffic cameras. Data on the composition of the vehicle fleet were acquired from manual recording of vehicle types over stretches of road where
Effects on traffic
Fig. 2 shows average traffic reductions for different types of roads. The reduction in total number of vehicle passages across the charge cordon over 24 h was 22%, corresponding to nearly 100 000 fewer passages to/from the inner city. The reduction was lower during the morning peak period (16%) and higher during the afternoon/evening peak (24%). For inner city streets the reduction in the number of vehicles was around 8% and for roads approaching the city around 5%. For the Essingeleden bypass,
Conclusions
The Stockholm Trial significantly reduced traffic emissions of NOx and particles in central Stockholm. The reductions were mainly due to decreased traffic flow; lower congestion had small effect. For NOx, emission reductions would have been larger without the extended bus traffic during the Stockholm Trial. Comparisons were made of NOx, NO2, CO and PM10 concentrations measured during the Stockholm Trial (the period January to July 2006), with the corresponding period in 2003, 2004, 2005 and
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Stockholm City Council.
References (41)
- et al.
The impact of congestion charging on vehicle emissions in London
Atmospheric Environment
(2005) Evidence of an increasing NO2/NOx emissions ratio from road traffic emissions
Atmospheric Environment
(2005)- et al.
Risks of exceeding the hourly EU limit value for nitrogen dioxide resulting from increased road transport emissions of primary nitrogen dioxide
Atmospheric Environment
(2007) - et al.
Urban scale modeling of particle number concentration in Stockholm
Atmospheric Environment
(2005) - et al.
Properties and toxicological effects of particles from the interaction between tyres, road pavement and winter traction material
Science of The Total Environment
(2008) - et al.
Factors affecting non-tailpipe aerosol particle emissions from paved roads: on road measurements in Stockholm, Sweden
Atmospheric Environment
(2008) - et al.
Estimation and validation of PM2.5/PM10 exhaust and non-exhaust emission factors for practical street pollution modelling
Atmospheric Environment
(2007) - et al.
A model for vehicle induced non-tailpipe emissions of particles along Swedish roads
Atmospheric Environment
(2005) - et al.
Spatial analysis of annual air pollution exposure and mortality
Science of the Total Environment
(2004) - Baradaran, S., et al., 2006. Evaluation of the Effects of the Stockholm Trial on Road Traffic....