ArticlesCompliance with electrodiagnostic guidelines for patients undergoing carpal tunnel release
Section snippets
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study by using 1998 and 1999 Medicare Part B data. Through the physicians’ Current Procedural Terminology codes, we identified all Washington State Medicare beneficiaries who underwent an open or closed CTR in 1999. We also obtained billing records for all electrodiagnostic studies performed on these patients at least 1 year before their CTR (some patients had up to 2 years of data). The billing records contained the number of motor and sensory nerves tested,
Results
We found billing evidence of 1567 CTRs among Washington State Medicare patients in 1999. Table 2 contains demographics of the study population. Three hundred twenty-four (20.7%) patients did not have any electrodiagnostic testing during the study time frame. Of the remaining 1243 patients (79.3%) who had electrodiagnostic evaluation before surgeries, 1072 (68.4%) were given a diagnosis of CTS by using electrodiagnosis and 171 patients (10.9%) were given other diagnoses (the most frequent of
Discussion
This study shows that more than 20% of the 1567 patients undergoing CTR in Washington State in 1999 did not have an electrodiagnostic examination before surgery. An additional 10.9% had electrodiagnostic testing but were not diagnosed with CTS. Finally, 14.5% of this surgery cohort had electrodiagnostic results leading to a diagnosis of CTS, but the test did not meet AAEM standards. People living in rural areas seem to be particularly at risk for having no or inadequate electrodiagnostic workup
Conclusions
In the Washington State population of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing CTR, 21.4% of patients did not have an electrodiagnostic evaluation before that surgery. An additional 14.4% who received electrodiagnostic testing had evaluations that failed to meet the practice standards as recommended by AAEM. Policymakers should consider altering regulations to ensure that appropriate electrodiagnostic testing is performed before CTR.
Acknowledgments
We thank Lawrence Robinson, MD, Christine Rubadue, ND, and Linda Ruiz, JD, for their assistance with this manuscript.
References (15)
- et al.
Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Handresults of a questionnaire
J Hand Surg [Am]
(1987) Carpal tunnel decompression in spite of normal electromyography
J Hand Surg [Am]
(1983)- et al.
Job-related diseases and occupations within a large workers’ compensation data set
Am J Ind Med
(1998) - et al.
What is carpal tunnel syndrome?
JAMA
(1999) - et al.
Splinting vs surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndromea randomized controlled trial
JAMA
(2002) Carpal tunnel syndromecomplex issues with a “simple” condition
Neurology
(2001)- et al.
Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies
Am J Public Health
(1998)
Cited by (23)
Variation in Nonsurgical Services for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Across a Large Integrated Health Care System
2019, Journal of Hand SurgeryUtilization of Preoperative Electrodiagnostic Studies for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Analysis of National Practice Patterns
2016, Journal of Hand SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The proportion of providers that obtain EDS but believe it to be unnecessary is unknown in this study. Previous authors have suggested reasons for not ordering EDS studies before surgical release that include inconvenience of the test, delay to operation, conclusive history and physical examination, and unnecessary distress caused to the patient.15 The economic consequences of additional office visits and prolonged time to definitive treatment associated with EDS use could not be estimated in this study.
Current status on electrodiagnostic standards and guidelines in neuromuscular disorders
2011, Clinical NeurophysiologyProspective Evaluation of the Clinical Prediction of Electrodiagnostic Results in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
2009, PM and RCitation Excerpt :In addition, several studies have raised concerns regarding the practical implementation of electrodiagnostic testing in clinical practice [12,13]. In the United States, there appears to be variability in the provision of electrodiagnostic services with both physicians and non-physicians performing electrodiagnostic studies [12]. Furthermore, there is evidence that physicians other than physiatrists and neurologists are increasingly performing electrodiagnostic studies [14].
Occurrence of myofascial pain in patients with possible carpal tunnel syndrome - A single-blinded study
2009, European Journal of PainCurrent practice in the use of nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome by surgeons in the netherlands
2007, Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
Supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grant no. 1 P60 AR48093), the WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily of the University of Washington or CMS.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.