A methodology to quantify the stochastic distribution of friction coefficient required for level walking
Introduction
It is estimated that the annual direct cost of occupational injuries due to slips, trips and falls in the USA exceeds 6 billion US dollars (Courtney et al., 2001). Falls on the same level accounted for 65% of claim cases and 53% of claim costs in total direct workers’ compensation for occupational injuries due to slips and falls (Leamon and Murphy, 1995). Friction plays an important role in falls on the same level as summarized by Chang et al. (2001b).
Required friction is the minimum friction needed at the shoe and floor interface to support different types of human activities. When the required friction for an activity exceeds the available friction at the shoe and floor interface, a slip may occur (Redfern et al., 2001). The available friction represents the maximum frictional force that can be supported without a slip at the shoe and floor interface. The required coefficient of friction (RCOF) is typically measured on dry surfaces with a force plate and is one of the maximum values in the friction coefficient obtained by dividing the component of the measured ground reaction force (GRF) tangent to the floor surface by the normal component during a step (Redfern et al., 2001). A mechanical device, known as a slipmeter, is typically used to measure the available coefficient of friction (ACOF) at the contact interfaces (Chang et al., 2001a, Chang et al., 2001b). Hanson et al. (1999) developed a model to estimate the probability of a fall in which actual fall incidents in a laboratory environment were related to the differences between the means of the ACOF and RCOF with a logistic regression model.
The ACOF measured with slipmeters always has random variations even when identical samples are used (Chang and Matz, 2001). In addition, there are variations in friction with different samples of identical floor and shoe materials as shown by Chang and Matz (2001). Therefore, the ACOF for a particular interface is not a constant, but has a stochastic distribution. The concept of a stochastic distribution in the ACOF was discussed by Barnett (2002) and Marpet (2002).
During human locomotion, there is variation across steps. Hsiang and Chang (2002) investigated variations in the normal force at the shoe and floor interface during repeated walking. They reported the mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis of the distributions in the normal force during level normal walking on a treadmill. Although results from treadmill walking might not be applicable to normal walking, most of the results on level walking reported in the literature included only the means and standard deviations (Perkins, 1978; Strandberg, 1983; Redfern and DiPasquale, 1997; Hanson et al., 1999; Cham and Redfern, 2002; Lockhart et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2005).
Recently, a statistical model was developed to compare the ACOF and RCOF in estimating the probability of a slip or fall incident (Chang, 2004). In this model, a stochastic distribution was assumed for both the ACOF (pa) and RCOF (pr) as shown in Fig. 1. The cumulative probability for the RCOF (μr) to exceed the ACOF (μa), according to Chang (2004), iswhere pa and pr are the probability density functions for the ACOF and RCOF, respectively. Typically, the mean of the RCOF was compared with the mean of the ACOF and the situation was determined to be safe if the mean of the RCOF was less than the mean of the ACOF. However, in addition to differences in the mean values, the variations in the RCOF and ACOF could also contribute to the probability of a slip, as illustrated by Chang (2004). By using a stochastic distribution for the RCOF and ACOF, the estimate of the probability of a slip or fall incident may improve.
The RCOF of human locomotion has been widely investigated, as partially summarized by Redfern et al. (2001). Variations in the RCOF across and within participants were observed by Brough et al. (1979), Soames and Richardson (1985), Hoang et al. (1987) and Redfern and DiPasquale (1997). However, they did not attempt to quantify the variation statistically beyond calculating the means and standard deviations. Although the stochastic distributions of the normal force at the shoe and floor interface were quantified by Hsiang and Chang (2002), they did not investigate the friction coefficient at the same interface.
In this paper, a methodology to investigate the stochastic distributions of the RCOF for level walking at the shoe and floor interface is presented as the first step toward the estimate of slip probability based on the statistical model introduced by Chang (2004). To calculate the RCOF when a participant walks repeatedly on a leveled dry surface, a special walkway with multiple force plates was constructed for the measurement of the GRF at the shoe and floor interface. Due to the large number of successful strikes needed to investigate the stochastic distributions, the main objective of the experimental setup was to achieve this goal without fatiguing participants.
Section snippets
Methods
One set of data from an on-going large-scale study was randomly selected to illustrate the proposed approach. The data were generated by a 37-year-old female participant with a body height of 172.2 cm and body weight of 58 kg. The experimental procedures were explained to the participant, who then gave written informed consent, filled out a brief medical history and was screened to assure no active musculoskeletal disorders. The protocol was approved by an institutional review board for the
Results and discussion
The normal force and calculated friction coefficient from the GRF of a successful strike on the force plate based on the results obtained in this experiment are shown in Fig. 3. The sample size, mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis of the RCOF based on all the successful strikes for each foot and each walking condition are shown in Table 1. A total of 628 successful strikes were collected with an average of 78.5 strikes, ranging from 75 to 86, for each foot under each walking
Conclusions
This paper presents a methodology to investigate the stochastic distributions of the RCOF for level walking which is a critical element in the estimate of the potential risk for a slip and fall incident based on a statistical model. The main objective was to collect multiple strikes in one walk with three force plates specially designed for this experiment in order to reduce fatigue for participants. One participant was used in the current investigation to explore the feasibility of applying
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Ed Correa, Lauren Gwozdz, Richard Holihan, Jennie Jackson, Niall O’Brien, Margaret Rothwell and Peter Teare for their assistance during the course of this study.
References (20)
- et al.
Changes in gait biomechanics when anticipating slippery floors
Gait Posture
(2002) A statistical model to estimate the probability of slip and fall incidents
Saf. Sci.
(2004)- et al.
The slip resistance of common footwear materials measured with two slipmeters
Appl. Ergonom.
(2001) - et al.
The effect of gait speed and load carrying on the reliability of ground reaction forces
Saf. Sci.
(2002) - et al.
Relationship between age-related gait adaptations and required coefficient of friction
Saf. Sci.
(2005) Improved characterization of tribometric test results
Saf. Sci.
(2002)Slip and fall theory—extreme order statistics
Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergonom.
(2002)- et al.
Measurement of the coefficient of friction of floors
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
(1979) - et al.
The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, part 2: survey of friction measurement devices
Ergonomics
(2001) - et al.
The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, part 1: friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions
Ergonomics
(2001)
Cited by (20)
Fragility functions for highway RC bridge under various flood scenarios
2022, Engineering StructuresCitation Excerpt :Hence these variables along with the other variables area of reinforcing bars and cover of concrete are taken as deterministic variables. The randomness parameter of hydrodynamic force, mass density of concrete, compressive strength of concrete, yield strength of steel, coefficient of friction between concrete and elastomeric bearing, span of the bridge, pier height, pier width, pier depth, pile diameter, pile height and angle of internal friction of soil are taken as the random variables in this study [18,34–37]. The probability distributions, mean, coefficient of variation (COV) and the source for each random variables considered for further study are given in Table 3.
The available coefficient of friction associated with different slip probabilities for level straight walking
2013, Safety ScienceCitation Excerpt :Even under the same walking condition, there is variation across steps during human locomotion for each individual because every step is slightly different from the others. Therefore, the RCOF is not a constant for each individual even under the same walking condition, as demonstrated by Chang et al. (2008, 2012b). Chang et al. (2012b) investigated the stochastic distribution of the RCOF.
A comparison of required coefficient of friction for both feet in level walking
2012, Safety ScienceCitation Excerpt :Because every step during walking is slightly different from others due to differences in gait parameters, such as heel contact velocity and angle, and force exertion, variation in the RCOF exists across steps during human locomotion for each individual even under the same walking condition on the same floor condition. Therefore, the RCOF is not a constant for each individual even under identical conditions, as demonstrated by Chang et al. (2008). Typically, the RCOF data of both feet from the same participant under the same walking condition are pooled together without any detailed understanding of potential differences in the RCOF between the two feet.