Re-wetting, comfort, lubricant and moisturising solutions for the contact lens wearer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-0484(99)80012-5Get rights and content

Abstract

In recent years there have been significant changes in perspective and availability of eyedrops designed to provide comfort to the contact lens wearer. This review addresses the reasons why there is a need for these types of products and considers their potential impact on the corneal and conjunctival surface. The methods of assessment of these solutions are discussed and the range of current products and options for the UK practitioner are detailed.

References (99)

  • PhillipsA.J.

    Contact lens solutions

    Contact Lens J.

    (1977)
  • HopkinsG.A.

    Drugs and solutions used in contact lens practice

    Contact Lens J.

    (1988)
  • GassonA. et al.
  • MorganP. et al.

    Trends in UK contact lens prescribing

    Optician

    (1999)
  • AndraskoG. et al.

    The effect of humidity on dehydration of soft contact lenses on the eye

    Int. Contact Lens Clin.

    (1980)
  • MorrisonR.J. et al.

    The contact lens patients with dry eye symptoms

    Contemp. Optom.

    (1985)
  • NilssonS.E.G. et al.

    Contact lens wear in dry environments

    Acta Ophthalmol.

    (1986)
  • FarrisR.L.

    Contact lens wear in the management of the dry eye

    Int. Ophthalmol. Clin.

    (1987)
  • CarneyL.G. et al.

    Contact lens lubricants: Part. 1

    Contact Lens Spectrum

    (1988)
  • SorbaraL. et al.

    Contact lens wear in the dry eye patient. Predicting success and achieving it

    Canad. J. Optom.

    (1988/1989)
  • McLaughlinR. et al.

    Contact lens solutions update

    Contact Lens Spectrum

    (1989)
  • OrsbornG.N. et al.

    Management of dry eye symptoms in soft lens wearers

    Contact Lens Spectrum

    (1989)
  • CafferyB.E. et al.

    Is there a better ‘comfort drop?’

    J. Am. Optom. Assoc.

    (1990)
  • FinnemoreV.M.

    Is the dry eye contact lens wearer at risk? Not usually

    Cornea

    (1990)
  • GoldingT.R. et al.

    Soft lens lubricants and prelens tear film stability

    Optom. Vis. Sci.

    (1990)
  • SilkA.A.

    Dry eyes and the contact lens wearer: a nutritional approach

    Trans. Br. Contact Lens Assoc. (Sci Mtg).

    (1990)
  • EfronN. et al.

    The effect of soft lens lubricants on symptoms and lens dehydration

    CLAO J.

    (1991)
  • PatelS.

    Hydrogel lens water content and the stability of the prelens tear film

    Optom. Vis. Sci.

    (1991)
  • BasingerK. et al.

    No-nonsense solutions to the tear dilemma

    Contact Lens Spectrum

    (1994)
  • FattI. et al.

    Contact lens performances in different climates

    Optometry Today

    (1994)
  • RocherP. et al.

    Hydrogel contact lenses

    Optometry Today

    (1995)
  • BruceA.S. et al.

    Mechanisms of dryness in soft lens wear — role of BUT and deposits

    Clin. Exptl. Optom.

    (1995)
  • PritchardN. et al.

    Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses

    CLAO J.

    (1996)
  • GuillonJ-P.

    Dry eye in contact lens wear

    Optician

    (1997)
  • EfronN.

    Contact lens-associated tear film dysfunction

    Optician

    (1998)
  • McDonaldJ.C. et al.

    Sick building syndrome in a Canadian office complex

    Arch. Envirnm. Hlth.

    (1993)
  • DoughtyM.J. et al.

    A patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across Canada

    Optom. Vis. Sci.

    (1997)
  • HaganS. et al.

    Prevalence of dry eye among computer users

    Optom. Vis. Sci.

    (1998)
  • ShimmuraS. et al.

    Results of a population-based questionnaire on the symptoms and lifestyles associated with dry eye

    Cornea

    (1999)
  • GrosvenorT.P.

    Contact Lens Theory and Practice

  • DabeziesO.H.

    Contact lenses and their solutions. A review of basic principles

    Eye Ear Nose Throat Monthly

    (1966)
  • KoettingR.A. et al.

    The effect of polyvinylpyrollidone with hydroxyethylcellulose on three o'clock and nine o'clock staining

    Contacto

    (1971)
  • CuretonG.L. et al.

    Soft contact lens solutions, past, present and future

    J. Am. Optom. Assoc.

    (1974)
  • SibleyM.J. et al.

    Understanding sorbic acid-preserved contact lens solutions

    Int. Contact Lens Clin.

    (1984)
  • LoveridgeR. et al.

    An in-practice assessment of the clinical performance of Gentle Touch for dry-eyed and previously unsuccessful soft lens wearers

    Optometry Today

    (1996)
  • HesterT.

    Comparing the dry eye performance of two soft contact lenses

    Contact Lens Spectrum

    (1997)
  • LempM.A. et al.

    Omafilcon A (Proclear) soft contact lenses in a dry eye population

    CLAO J.

    (1999)
  • KinneyK.A.

    Detecting dry eye in contact lens wearers

    Contact Lens Spectrum

    (1998)
  • LempM.A.

    Is the dry eye contact lens wearer at risk? Yes

    Cornea

    (1990)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Interfacial polymerization of a thin film on contact lenses for improving lubricity

      2020, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      A large number of patients still experience discomfort and dryness in spite of the significant improvements through surface treatments and incorporation of comfort agents in contact lenses. A possible explanation for the persisting symptoms is that the absorbed wetting agents desorb with time, leading to the reduced end of day comfort [20]. Furthermore, preservative agents and buffers included in the care solutions can trigger allergic reactions and solution induced corneal staining (SICS) [21–26].

    • Improving wettability and lubricity of commercial contact lenses by polymerizing a thin film of dimethylacryamide

      2019, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
      Citation Excerpt :

      Chauhan et al. also explored incorporation of surfactants in contact lenses to improve lubricity [35]. However, the lens comfort is significantly reduced by the end of the day due to desorption of the absorbed and adsorbed surfactant [36]. Alcon has recently commercialized a water gradient contact lens that has a thin film of high water content polymer on the surface [37,38].

    • Incorporation of polymerizable surfactants in hydroxyethyl methacrylate lenses for improving wettability and lubricity

      2015, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Addition of surfactants in rewetting drops and lens care solutions has been found to be beneficial most likely due to improved wettability of the surface due to surfactant adsorption [15,16]. The adsorbed and absorbed surfactant however desorbs with time, possibly leading to the reduced end of day comfort [17]. Also, the preservatives included in the formulations can absorb into the lenses and then desorb during lens wear which could lead to patient discomfort and potential toxicity issues [18–21].

    • Fluorescein-tear breakup time as an assessment of efficacy of tear replacement therapy in dry eye patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2014, Ocular Surface
      Citation Excerpt :

      While the related terminology has broadened somewhat over the years, with “damage” replacing the once widely used term “desiccation” (i.e., dryness of the ocular surface), the overall consequence of dry eye disease is still that the normal interface between the tear film and the surface epithelia is likely to be compromised.8-10 The damage could be in the microplicae that constitute part of the surface of both the corneal epithelial cells11 and bulbar conjunctival cells,12 or in the glycocalyx associated with these surface structures.13,14 Mucus, largely derived from conjunctival goblet cells, produces the interface interacting with the cell surfaces and the aqueous phase of the tear film.

    • Bringing comfort to the masses: A novel evaluation of comfort agent solution properties

      2014, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
      Citation Excerpt :

      Contact lens induced dry eye (CLIDE) and contact lens associated discomfort (CLAD) complaints lead to decreased contact lens use and patient dissatisfaction with contact lenses [27–30]. Incorporating comfort agents into contact lenses prevents lens dehydration [31–34], reduces protein adhesion rates [35–40], maintains surface wettability and lubrication [37,41], decreases surface friction and tension [42–44], and has other effects [44]. It has been well documented that frequent application of comfort agent-containing eye drops can greatly increase the level of comfort perceived by consumers [15,16,23,41,45–61], though little work has been conducted to isolate the effects of comfort agent species, molecular weight, percent concentration, and dosage on the efficacy of comfort agents.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text