Original ArticlesMale Reproductive Effects of Lead, Including Species Extrapolation for the Rabbit Model 1
Introduction
The scientific process for the evaluation of reproductive risk from drugs and chemicals includes extrapolation from data obtained in animal models [1]. The differences between species, however, may limit the appropriate and accurate application of toxic effects in human risk assessment. Important criteria for an animal model of reproduction in humans include the existence of documented, relatable physiology of the species and the ability to analyze ejaculated semen. These aspects permit studies in which toxic effects can be related to humans because the focus of medical evaluation of the male is on analysis of ejaculated whole semen, not just sperm cells.
The most common laboratory species, the rat, does have well-documented reproductive physiology. However, it does not readily permit analysis of ejaculated semen for longitudinal effects. A review of animal models by Amann [2] has emphasized that rabbits are the smallest and least expensive laboratory animals in which serial semen samples can easily be obtained for morphologic, biochemical, and fertility evaluation.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rabbit model for assessment of male reproductive responses to a model chemical, lead. A qualitative and quantitative comparison between the experimental responses in the rabbit and published epidemiologic responses in humans for lead would indicate the usefulness of the model for predicting human spermatotoxic responses to lead and other similarly acting chemical toxicants. Lead as a model reproductive toxicant offers a uniquely important perspective in the quantitative species comparison because human blood lead levels are generally reported along with the observed health effect. By focusing on differences as they relate to blood lead levels rather than environmental exposures, a far more efficient experimental approach can be used. The relationship between exposure and blood lead levels has been extensively studied. Therefore, the results of the present study are not route dependent.
Experimental evaluation of the effects of lead on reproductive function in rabbits has been reported for many years. In 1914, Cole and Bachuber [3] published data showing that offspring from Dutch male rabbits that were dosed with lead acetate showed increased mortality and decreased weights. In a more recently reported animal study using rabbits, Willems et al. [4] attempted to determine the effects of lead acetate administered by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection, but they failed to show effects on sperm morphology, sister chromatid exchanges, and on formation of micronuclei. The exposure was for 14 weeks; however, there were only five male rabbits in each treatment, and blood lead levels at the end of the Willems study were 6.6 μg/dL, 53.2 μg/dL, and 61 μg/dL. Sperm were obtained at sacrifice only. The design did not permit analysis of ejaculated semen, and the morphologic assessment reflected cells undergoing maturation at lower blood lead levels than those measured at the end of the study.
As a result of advantages offered by rabbits for reproductive toxicology, the National Toxicology Program agencies, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, have focused on research directed at statistical considerations of study designs [5] and a comparative evaluation of ethylene dibromide [6]. The comparative study demonstrated that although the rabbit was not as sensitive as humans, four of seven semen parameters that were altered in the human study [6] were significantly changed in rabbits. An important consideration was that the ethylene dibromide dosing in the rabbit study was only for 5 d. The conclusion was that the rabbit appears to be an important model for evaluating male reproductive toxicity in humans and warrants further evaluation and “validating any animal species as a general model for human response requires evaluation of many different classes of chemicals” [6].
Section snippets
Experimental Design and Schedule
The design described by Williams et al. [5] in which a 5-week pre-exposure (baseline testing) period is followed by a 10-week (exposure testing) period (Design 2) was used with an extension in the exposure testing period (15 weeks) to allow for the anticipated lead uptake (estimated to require 4 to 5 weeks to reach the target levels). This design allows for studying effects on semen quality through six cycles of the seminiferous epithelium [2]. Male rabbits were sampled weekly through the
Blood Lead Levels
Fig. 1 presents the blood lead levels over the 20 weeks of the study. The blood lead levels remained low at the limit of detection (1.1 μg/dL) for the first 5 weeks for all treatments and throughout the 20 weeks for the controls. All values were plotted, including those below the limit of detection. Excursions above the target levels occurred in the high dose treatments. The average blood lead levels during the last 5 weeks were 0.47 μg/dL for the controls, 24.8 μg/dL for the 20-μg/dL target
Discussion
The longitudinal design of this study was essential for studying spermatogenic endpoints; however, modeling of the longitudinal effects has presented many difficulties. The duration of spermatogenesis in the rabbit is 48 d; therefore, sperm produced before 48 d of the onset of exposure may not reflect the full effect of the toxicant. In fact, it is recommended that studies of male reproductive toxicants extend at least through six cycles of the seminiferous epithelium to allow for toxicant
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the expert advice provided by Dr. Robt. H. Foote.
References (27)
A Method for quantitative assessment of reproductive risks to the human male
Fundam Appl Toxicol
(1992)Use of animal models for detecting specific alterations in reproduction
Fundam Appl Toxicol
(1982)- et al.
Semen analysis assessment in rabbitsstatistical power and design considerations for toxicology studies
Fundam Appl Toxicol
(1990) - et al.
The effects of ethylene dibromide on semen quality and fertility in the rabbitevaluation of a model for human seminal characteristics
Fundam Appl Toxicol
(1991) - et al.
Measurement of semen quality, fertility, and reproductive hormones to assess dibromochloropropane effects in live rabbits
Fundam Appl Toxicol
(1986) - et al.
Ligand/receptor binding for 2,3,7,8-TCDDimplications for risk assessment
Fundam Appl Toxicol
(1993) - et al.
The effect of lead on the germ cells of the male rabbit and fowl as indicated by their progeny
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
(1914) - et al.
Absence of an effect of lead acetate on sperm morphology, sister chromatid exchanges or on micronuclei formation in rabbits
Arch Toxicol
(1982) - et al.
Toxicology of lead acetate to female rabbits after chronic s.c. administration1. Biochemical and clinical effects
Arch Toxicol
(1990) - et al.
Sperm count suppression without endocrine dysfunction in lead exposed men
Arch Environ Health
(1987)
Study of sperm characteristics in persons occupationally exposed to lead
Am J Indust Med
Hypogonadism in chronically lead exposed men
Infertility
Cited by (32)
Arsenic, cadmium, and lead
2017, Reproductive and Developmental ToxicologyEvaluation of urinary metal concentrations and sperm DNA damage in infertile men from an infertility clinic
2016, Environmental Toxicology and PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :Toxicological studies have also shown that metal exposures have adverse effects on male reproductive health. Toxic metals such as arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and mercury (Hg) have been shown to disrupt spermatogenesis, decrease testicular weights, and alter reproductive hormones (Agrawal and Chansouria, 1989; Moorman et al., 1998; Sarkar et al., 2003; Saygi et al., 1991). Other metals such as cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), and selenium (Se) are essential for various biochemical and physiological functions, but these metals at relatively high levels can also cause adverse male reproductive outcomes as reviewed by Sengupta (2013).
Cross-species coherence in effects and modes of action in support of causality determinations in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Science Assessment for Lead
2015, ToxicologyCitation Excerpt :Extensive epidemiologic and toxicological evidence supports an association between Pb and sperm/semen production, quality, and function (Table 4). Pb exposure affects sperm quality and function as well as damages male reproductive organs of laboratory mammals including rabbits and rodents (Nava-Hernandez et al., 2009; Moorman et al., 1998). Toxicological and epidemiologic studies support one another; epidemiologic studies in occupationally exposed men and some but not all studies of men from fertility clinics report associations of Pb exposure or blood Pb levels with decrements in a variety of sperm viability measures including decreased sperm count and sperm head abnormalities (Mendiola et al., 2011; Hsu et al., 2009; Kasperczyk et al., 2008; Meeker et al., 2008; Naha and Manna, 2007; Telisman et al., 2007; Naha and Chowdhury, 2006).
Arsenic, cadmium and lead
2011, Reproductive and Developmental ToxicologyOccupational and environmental exposures to heavy metals: Risk factors for male infertility in Lebanon?
2008, Reproductive ToxicologyReproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Metals
2007, Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, Third Edition
- 1
This work was supported in part by IA # YO1-ES-40266, from NIEHS, National Toxicology Program.