Elsevier

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volume 41, Issue 11, November 2003, Pages 1453-1462
Food and Chemical Toxicology

Review
Hazard and risk assessment of industrial chemicals in the occupational context in europe: some current issues

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00193-5Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper is about industrial chemicals, the manner in which their toxicity is assessed and the use of such assessments in regulatory decision-making. It begins with general points concerning toxicological data availability and hazard identification, then moves on to risk assessment and occupational exposure limits, and finally looks briefly at three specific toxicological issues, asthma, chronic toxic encephalopathy, and “low toxicity” dust effects on the lung, where the science is far from resolved. The overall purpose of the paper is to raise, or perhaps to act as a reminder of a number of issues of particular relevance to industrial chemicals and the occupational setting, and hopefully to prompt further thinking and perhaps some new initiatives directed at the areas in question.

Introduction

Genuine toxicity has occurred, and continues to occur, in people exposed to chemicals at work. In the UK, thousands of such cases are reported each year. Skin problems caused by irritation and/or sensitisation, and respiratory diseases including asthma and long-term problems of dust or fibre accumulation in the lungs are especially prominent (Keynes et al., 1996, Jones et al., 1998, Cherry et al., 2000). This is not intended to be an emotive introduction; however, it does indicate that in the workplace there is real-life toxicity occurring that needs to be addressed. In addition, there are many other instances of claims of, or conjecture about, potential adverse effects in workers exposed to chemicals, together with issues of data availability, sufficiency, interpretation and use in a regulatory context; all of which adds up to a substantial and challenging agenda.

This paper discusses a number of current issues surrounding the assessment of the toxicological hazards of industrial and general commercial chemicals and the risks to health that might be posed by exposure to them in an occupational environment. This perspective comes at a time when considerable change is being considered in Europe in relation to many elements of the established regulatory regime and procedures involved.

The intention of the paper is to focus more on the toxicological issues than on the detail of the regulatory system, which the reader can find in the references cited. Nevertheless, a brief outline of the regulatory principles involved is perhaps merited at the outset.

In the European Union (EU), the manner in which the toxicology of industrial chemicals is characterised and used in regulatory decision-making in the occupational context is based on the following concepts. Suppliers of chemicals should convey to the recipients of their chemicals information on toxicological hazards, accompanied by simple safety advice, via EU-standardised labelling and safety data sheets. Recipients and users of chemicals (and manufacturers/suppliers in relation to their own sites) are responsible for understanding their local situation. With reference to the hazard information supplied, they are responsible for assessing and appropriately managing the extent of worker exposure so as to eliminate, or at least minimise the risk of toxicity being expressed. Regulatory authorities across the EU have established this regulatory framework and also play more specific roles, such as defining how some substances should be labelled, or specifying occupational exposure limits for individual chemicals.

Section snippets

Data availability and hazard identification

Key to all of the above is toxicological knowledge. Very many chemicals were commercially manufactured, and supplied to others, in the UK, EU and across the world, before legislation was in place requiring any systematic approach to characterising their toxicological properties. About 20 years ago, when the European Economic Community, the EEC as it was then, was in the process of introducing such legislation for the first time, for what were to be “new” substances (see below), an inventory was

Assessment of risk and the setting of “health-protective” exposure standards

In many areas of regulatory toxicology, when assessing risk or setting recommended exposure limits or standards, there is a strong tradition, stretching back about 50 years, of using so-called default uncertainty factors to allow for unknown but potential variabilities, based on an assumption of possible enhanced responsiveness in some exposed humans compared with the responses seen in the available animal and human toxicological data for a substance (IPCS, 1987, Lu, 1988). A default

Asthma

A current major concern in the field of occupational exposure to industrial chemicals is the reported incidence of occupationally-induced asthma. From data reported to the SWORD (Surveillance of Work Related and Occupational Respiratory Disease) scheme by chest and occupational physicians it is estimated that about 1000 new cases of substance-induced asthma are occurring each year in UK workplaces (McDonald et al., 2000). The most frequently identified causative agents are isocyanates, flour

Conclusion

Toxicology remains very important and relevant to today's occupational environment; toxicity still occurs and there are ill-health problems still to be conquered (and also possibly new threats to be spotted in advance and headed off). There are numerous scientific issues that remain unresolved, where our knowledge and understanding are inadequate; a few examples have been discussed in this paper. There is also considerable agitation within the EU regulatory system, both in terms of the

References (57)

  • O Axelson et al.

    A case referent study on neuropsychiatric disorders among workers exposed to solvents

    Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health

    (1976)
  • CEC, 2001. Commission of the European Communities: White Paper—strategy for a future chemicals policy. COM (2001) 88...
  • M Chan-Yeung et al.

    Occupational asthma—state of the art

    American Review of Respiratory Diseases

    (1986)
  • N.M Cherry et al.

    Surveillance of work-related diseases by occupational physicians in the UKOPRA 1996–99

    Occupational Medicine

    (2000)
  • A.H Choudhury et al.

    Associations between respiratory illness and PM10 air pollution

    Archives of Environmental Health

    (1997)
  • DFG, 1992. Occupational Toxicants—Critical Data Evaluation for MAK Values and Classification of Carcinogens, vol 3, pp....
  • DFG, 2002. Maximum Concentrations at the Workplace and Biological Tolerance values for Working Materials. Report No....
  • F Dick et al.

    Neurological deficits in solvent-exposed paintersa syndrome including impaired colour vision, cognitive defects, tremor and loss of vibration sensation

    Quarterly Journal of Medicine

    (2000)
  • D.W Dockery et al.

    An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1993)
  • Commission Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of Major-Accident Hazards involving dangerous substances

    Official Journal of the European Communities

    (1996)
  • Information Notices on Diagnosis of Occupational Diseases. Report EUR 1468 EN

    (1997)
  • Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16[1] of Directive 89/391/EEC)

    Official Journal of the European Communities

    (1998)
  • Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member states relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations

    Official Journal of the European Communities

    (1999)
  • Commission Directive 2000/39/EC establishing a first list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work

    Official Journal of the European Communities

    (2000)
  • EC, 2003. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration,...
  • Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member states relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations

    Official Journal of the European Communities

    (1967)
  • Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations

    Official Journal of the European Communities

    (1976)
  • Council Directive 79/831/EEC of 18 September 1979 amending for the sixth time Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances

    Official Journal of the European Communities

    (1979)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Evaluation of heavy metal ions in the groundwater samples from selected automobile workshop areas in northern Pakistan

      2020, Groundwater for Sustainable Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Heavy metals emanating from anthropogenic automobile workshops introduce a number of toxic metals into the environment (Katana et al., 2013). This high level of metals has been correlated to the continued exposure to the elemental sources from industries (Fairhurst, 2003). The level of heavy metals in soil is usually high nearby the sources, and decrease with both depth and distance because of the physical dilution and increasing mobility limits (Liu et al., 2007).

    • Assessment of the potential human health risks from exposure to complex substances in accordance with REACH requirements. “White spirit” as a case study

      2018, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A second is that the neurobehavioral effects were due to more intense exposures to solvents used in spray painting as is evident in the exposure profiles documented in Mikkelsen et al. (1988). Whether or not small decrements in psychometric tests are clinically relevant is controversial (e.g., Fairhurst, 2003; Gamble, 2000; Lees-Hawley and Williams, 1997) but beyond the scope of this paper. For purposes of this discussion, it should be noted that in the most recent occupational study of construction painters, Lundberg et al. (1995) reported that there were no statistically significant decrements in performance in the low exposure group - in fact, both Lundberg and Mikkelsen reported that the performance of painters in the low exposure groups was superior to that of the corresponding control groups.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the UK Health and Safety Executive.

    View full text