Elsevier

Clinical Biomechanics

Volume 8, Issue 1, January 1993, Pages 20-24
Clinical Biomechanics

Paper
Test—retest variation in lifting capacity and indices of subject effort

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(05)80005-1Get rights and content

Summary

Tests of lifting capacity ideally produce consistent outcomes from one test to the next. Physiological indices of effort, such as heart rates, coefficients of force variation, and isokinetic force—distance curve variability, should also remain constant. This study examined the test—retest reliability of isometric, isokinetic and isoinertial maximal lifting tests in pain-free, well-motivated subjects. First, isokinetic and isoinertial maximum lifting forces and weights were quite consistent between test sessions, while isometric forces increased slightly in the second session. Second, heart rates did not vary significantly between test sessions of isokinetic and isoinertial modes. However, other indices of effort, including force variances, force—weight differences and ratios, and force—weight curve variability, varied significantly between test sessions. Test—retest variations in these non-cardiac effort indices imply that these indices may not reliably distinguish maximal from submaximal lifting efforts even in normal subjects.

Relevance

Efforts to reduce occupational low-back injuries and disability have focused recently on measurements of lifting capacity. Accurate and reliable estimation of subject effort is critical to the validity of such measurements. This study demonstrates a need for reconsideration of previously reported indices of lifting effort.

References (18)

  • MitalA et al.

    Reliability of repetitive dynamic strengths as a screening tool for manual lifting tasks

    Clin Biomech

    (1986)
  • WaddellG

    A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain

    Spine

    (1987)
  • KroemerKHE

    An isoinertial technique to assess individual lifting capability

    Hum Factors

    (1987)
  • SnookSH

    The design of manual handling tasks

    Ergonomics

    (1978)
  • BattieMC et al.

    Isometric lifting strength as a predictor of industrial back pain

    Spine

    (1989)
  • Biering-SorensenF

    Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period

    Spine

    (1984)
  • KishinoND et al.

    Quantification of lumbar function: Part 4: Isometric and isokinetic lifting simulation in normal subjects and low-back dysfunction patients

    Spine

    (1985)
  • AndersonGBJ et al.

    Worker selection

  • HazardRG et al.

    Functional restoration with behavioural support: A one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain

    Spine

    (1989)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • Ergonomics and Work Assessments

    2008, Ergonomics for Therapists
  • Ergonomics and Work Assessments

    2007, Ergonomics for Therapists
  • Coefficient of variation as a measure of subject effort

    1995, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text