Work accidents among shiftworkers in industry

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00050-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The study examined the risk potentials and accident patterns amongst the monthly rotating shiftworkers and permanent nightworkers in textile industries. The retrospective- cum-prospective study covered 3470 fatal and non-fatal accidents that had been taken place in 11 textile departments, spinning, weaving, engineering, etc. A detailed questionnaire survey indicates that frequent occurrence of accidents in the industries was a culmination of multiple factors, such as man-machine interfaces, methods of work, working conditions and environmental stresses. Man-days lost due to accidents were highest in spinning departments (i.e., 3.25 days per accident). Physical injuries in textile workers were moderate to serious in severity, and the fingers of the upper extremity accounted for highest number of accidents. Higher rate of accidents were noted during June to August, and January and February had lower rate of accidents. Analysis of log-linear model of contingency tables suggests that the time variations (e.g., first and second half of each shift) have some association with the occurrence of accidents in different activities. About 60% accidents of the morning shift were in the first half of the shift; in night work, the second half of the shift constituted 57% of the accidents. In general, there are two main risk factors: (i) the start up of the working period (e.g., first half of the morning shift) and (ii) the accumulated fatigue (e.g., a rise in percentage of accidents reaching peak at fifth or sixth hour in the night shift).

Relevance to industry

Industrial accidents result in considerable human suffering and economic losses at different levels in society. The paper describes the occurrence of accidents and types of traumatic injuries in textile industries, and relates to critical temporal factors as associated risks to work. Organizational commitment to safety promotion and joint optimization of work-time scheduling may add to strategic accident prevention.

References (11)

  • N. Carter et al.

    Near-accident reporting: a review of Swedish research

    Journal of Occupational Accidents

    (1985)
  • Abbreviated Injury Scale

    (1985)
  • P. Andlauer et al.

    Le travail en equipes alternantes

  • S.P. Bhatia et al.

    Accidents in Textile Factories, Part III: Finishing Process

    (1975)
  • S. Folkard

    Is there a ‘best compromise’ shift system?

    Ergonomics

    (1992)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (42)

  • Assessment of occupational risks In Turkish manufacturing systems with data-driven models

    2019, Journal of Manufacturing Systems
    Citation Excerpt :

    Finally, conclusions are given in Section 5. In the literature, studies on the occupational accident analysis can be assessed under four themes: studies that state the record of occupational accidents, which provide useful information to obtain a general view on the accidents with descriptive statistics (e.g. [15,29–35]); studies that present the model types to estimate the possible occupational accident number and the accident results based on the true occupational accidents, which will be the guide for measures to prevent losses (e.g [36–38].) ; studies that consist of literature reviews that provide very important and practical information for researchers (e.g. [39,40]); and studies that express significant information by analyzing a large amount of accident data based on data mining approaches.

  • Prediction of work-related accidents according to working conditions using support vector machines

    2011, Applied Mathematics and Computation
    Citation Excerpt :

    According to the model, those workers who have a very uncomfortable seat are more frequently victims of an occupational accident, as well as those who report neck or upper back discomfort due to physical strain. This point can be explained by the connection between physical discomfort, fatigue, risk and, finally, accident occurrence, as has been shown in different contexts by various authors [52–58]. Another group of interesting variables are those related to psychosocial or stressing factors: P34_2 (Psychosocial possibilities: can get help from boss if asked), P34_11 (Psychosocial possibilities: considers job emotionally demanding) and P45 (Fit between working hours and family or social commitments).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text