Self-reported working conditions of VDU operators and associations with musculoskeletal symptoms: a cross-sectional study focussing on gender differences

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00131-2Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to describe working conditions and the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among male and female VDU operators, and to assess associations between work-related physical and psychosocial exposures and neck and upper limb symptoms by gender. The study population comprised a variety of occupations from both private and public sectors. Data on physical and psychosocial exposures were collected by questionnaires, as were data on musculoskeletal symptoms. Univariate associations between exposures and symptoms affecting the neck and upper limbs were estimated by calculating the prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We also assessed the potential excess odds ratio attributable to interaction between gender and, one by one, exposure variable. Women (n=785) used the computer on average 3.9 h/day and men (n=498) 3.6. Variation of different work tasks was lower among females than among males. Nineteen per cent of the women and 12% of the men did >3 h of continued computer work without breaks (>10 min) at least twice a week. Twice as many women as men experienced high job strain (high demands and low decision latitude). A higher proportion of women than men reported symptoms ⩾3 days the preceding month from the upper body, irrespective of body region. For many of the studied exposures the prevalence of symptoms in one or several body regions was increased with increasing exposure, indicating exposure-response relationships. Duration of computer work was associated with symptoms among both men and women. Only among men, duration of work with a non-keyboard computer input device was associated with symptoms. Only among women, job strain was associated with symptoms. Time pressure was associated with higher prevalence of symptoms among women. Among men, time pressure was associated with lower prevalence of symptoms. Thus, the associations differed between the genders. Women experienced higher prevalence of symptoms than men in all body regions and they were more often exposed to physical and psychosocial conditions that in previous studies have been considered harmful, than men.

Relevance to industry

Work-related exposures and the associations between these factors and musculoskeletal symptoms among VDU operators differed in some respect between men and women. This should be considered in intervention programs. The results from this study gives further support to the advice that duration of computer work, time pressure and job strain should be reduced in order to decrease the risk of muskuloskeletal disorders among professional computer workers.

Introduction

In recent years, the occurrence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the neck and upper limbs, such as finger extensor and flexor tendinitis, carpal tunnel syndrome and neck-shoulder myofascial pain, has increased dramatically and now account for nearly 70% of reported occupational illnesses in the USA (Bureau of Labour Statistics, 1996). Computer-intensive workplaces report a high prevalence and incidence of such disorders among the workers (Bergqvist et al., 1995; Faucette and Rempel, 1994; Punnett and Bergqvist, 1997; Tittiranonda et al., 1999). Among the working population in Sweden today, 68% of all men and 63% of all women use personal computers at work. Computerised work is likely to increase (SCB, 1999; Ekman et al., 2000). Of all reported work injuries due to musculoskeletal illness in Sweden, work with computer equipment was reported as the cause of the problems among 13% of the women and 4% of the men in 1998, compared with 6% and 1%, respectively, in 1992 (Wigaeus Tornqvist et al., 2001a).

Several epidemiological studies show that intensive computer work and factors related to work organisation, as well as physical and psychosocial exposures in computer work, are associated with increased risk of neck and upper extremity disorders (Tittiranonda et al., 1999; Ekman et al., 2000; Wigaeus Tornqvist et al., 2001a).

Studies of modern working conditions report substantial changes in work organisation and work content, concerning factors like downsizing, just-in-time jobs, time pressure, job demands and decision latitude (Aronsson, 1999; Härenstam et al., 2001). To a great extent this also concerns computerised modern work.

New technical devices are continuously being introduced to supplement the keyboard, such as the computer mouse, track-ball, computer pen, pointer, track-point, track-pad and even voice control. A good ergonomic design of the computer workstation is important to avoid musculoskeletal disorders (Sauter et al., 1991; Karlqvist, 1998; Aarås et al., 1999). The design is also important for comfort, productivity and quality of the VDU-produced work (Tittiranonda et al., 1999; Jensen et al., 2001).

Exposures relevant to the occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders include both physical workload and the organisation of work in general (Punnett and Herbert, 2000). There is scientific evidence of cause-and-effect relationships between repetitive motion, forceful work, and postural stress for disorders of the back and upper extremities (Bernard, 1997). The risk is particularly high when two or more of these job features are simultaneous and exert synergistic effects. Thus, primary prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace should include ergonomics programs that emphasize, e.g. the ergonomic design of workstations, equipment, tools, and work organisation to fit the capabilities and limitations of the human body (Hagberg et al., 1995; Westgaard and Winkel, 1997). Work organisation determines, e.g. work pace, repetitiveness, duration of exposures, and recovery time as well as psychosocial dimensions of the work environment such as decision latitude, psychosocial job demands, and social support from supervisors and among co-workers. High psychological work demands typically involve both rapid physical work pace and feelings of time pressure. Highly stereotyped finger motion patterns occur when a manual job both is monotonous and offers little decision autonomy (Punnett and Herbert, 2000).

Being a female is often described as a “risk factor” for many musculoskeletal disorders because prevalence in the general population and in large groups of employees have been reported to be twice as high among women compared to men (Viikari-Juntura et al., 1991; de Zwart et al., 1997). As Punnett and Herbert (2000) point out, depending of the gender segregated labour market it is essential to distinguish between gender differences in crude prevalence or risk and differences in the effects of occupational exposures on musculoskeletal outcome. The associations of musculoskeletal disorders with gender and occupational ergonomic exposures should be assessed separately in order to determine whether women are at increased risk when exposed to the same ergonomic stressors as men.

The aim of the present study was to describe working conditions and the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among male and female VDU operators, and to assess associations between work-related physical and psychosocial exposures, respectively, and neck and upper limb symptoms, and whether these associations differed between women and men.

Section snippets

Study design

The present study is the baseline of a prospective cohort study aiming at identifying risk and preventive factors for musculoskeletal disorders and impaired performance during work with a computer mouse and other input devices.

Information about symptoms, work organisation, work content, physical, psychosocial and individual factors during the preceding month was collected by questionnaire at baseline.

Together with the employers and the Occupational Health Care Centres of the different work

Working hours and tasks

Ordinary working hours for the men were 39 (SD:3.9) h/week and 37 (SD:6.0) for the women. Among the men, 69% worked overtime with an average of 4.1 (SD:4.2) h/week, and among the women, 63% with an average of 3.2 (SD:5.0) h/week. Computer work was the most common work task for both men and women, averaging 3.6 h/day and 3.9 h/day (Table 1). Only three men and five women had not done computer work during the last month. Dominating work tasks, besides computer work, lasting for at least 30 min/day,

Discussion

The results from this study confirm associations between earlier suggested harmful exposures among VDU operators and symptoms in the neck/shoulders, shoulder joint/upper arms and elbow/forearm/hands (Punnett and Bergqvist, 1997; Tittiranonda et al., 1999). Such harmful exposures include work organisational as well as physical and psychosocial exposures (Wells et al., 2001).

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Swedish Work Environmental Fund is greatly acknowledged. We are also grateful to all work sites and subjects who participated in the study and to everybody in the “Epi-mouse group” who contributed with highly qualified work in the data collection.

References (43)

  • L Karlqvist

    A process for the development, specification and evaluation of VDU work tables

    Applied Ergonomics

    (1998)
  • L Punnett et al.

    Work-related musculoskeletal disordersis there a gender differential, and so, what does it mean?

  • R Westgaard et al.

    Ergonomic intervention research for improved musculoskeletal healtha critical review

    International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

    (1997)
  • A Aarås et al.

    Can a more neutral position of the forearm when operating a computer mouse reduce the pain level for visual display unit operators? a prospective epidemiological intervention study

    International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

    (1999)
  • G Aronsson

    Contingent workers and health and safety

    Work Employment and Society

    (1999)
  • G Aronsson et al.

    Work organisation and musculoskeletal discomfort in VDT work (in Swedish)

    Arbete och Hälsa

    (1992)
  • U Bergqvist et al.

    Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers—individual, ergonomic and work organizational factors

    Ergonomics

    (1995)
  • Bernard, B.P. (Ed.), 1997. Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors. A Critical Review of Epidemiological...
  • Brunnberg, H., Karlqvist, L., 2000. Evaluation of flexible offices. International Ergonomics Association XIVth...
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics Report on Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, 1996. Bureau of Labor Statistics,...
  • A Ekman et al.

    Gender differences in musculoskeletal health of computer and mouse users in the Swedish work force

    Occupational Medicine

    (2000)
  • J Faucette et al.

    VDT-related musculoskeletal symptomsinteractions between work postures and psychosocial work factors

    American Journal of Industrial Medicine

    (1994)
  • A Franzblau et al.

    Medical screen of office workers for upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders

    International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

    (1993)
  • Gardner, M.J., Altman, D.G. (Eds), 1989. Statistics with confidence-Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines....
  • F Gerr et al.

    Computer users’ postures and associations with workstation characteristics

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal

    (2000)
  • M Hagberg et al.
  • G Hägg

    Static work load and occupational myalgiaa new explanation model

  • Härenstam, A., Westberg, H., Karlqvist, L., Nise, G., Leijon, O., Rydbeck, A., Waldenström, K., Wiklund, P., 2000. How...
  • Härenstam, A., Bodin, G., Karlqvist, L., Nise, G., Schéele, P., 2001 The modern work-style—assessing exposures in...
  • C Jensen et al.

    Computer work-related factors and musculoskeletal symptoms

  • R Karasek et al.

    Healthy Work, Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life

    (1990)
  • Cited by (145)

    • Education inequalities in cardiovascular and coronary heart disease in Italy and the role of behavioral and biological risk factors

      2022, Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      A few studies have actually observed a higher CHD risk among women who take care of children or grandchildren and also engage in paid work [44–46], which would indicate that work-family conflicts may also play a role in the development of CVD. Furthermore, various studies have found that women are more exposed than men to the main work stressors associated with CVD risk, especially those in low-grade occupations, such as low job control [47–50], high psychological demand [51], and high job strain [49,52,53]. The major strength of the study is the use of the Italian Longitudinal Study, which allowed us to evaluate education inequalities in CVD and CHD adjusted for several potential confounders available at baseline in a large representative sample of the Italian population.

    • Level of exoskeleton support influences shoulder elevation, external rotation and forearm pronation during simulated work tasks in females

      2022, Applied Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      A study on sex differences among electric utility workers found female to male rate ratios, after adjustment for age, occupation and experience, of 1.49 for all injuries, 1.27 for the head and neck, 1.48 for the upper arm, 1.11 for the back and 2.11 for the lower body (Kelsh and Sahl, 1996). Further, among visual display unit operators, 71% of women reported musculoskeletal symptoms compared to 51% of men (Karlqvist et al., 2002). For lower exposure groups, unexposed women had up to double the odds ratio compared to exposed men for all risk factors studied (Karlqvist et al., 2002).

    • Effects of a sit-stand-walk intervention on musculoskeletal discomfort, productivity, and perceived physical and mental fatigue, for computer-based work

      2020, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gender did not have an impact on the dependent variables. While research on computer-based work in the seated condition, shows evidence for significant gender differences in the prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort and fatigue (Gerr et al., 2002; Hedge, 1988; Karlqvist et al., 2002; Schneider et al., 2010), recent studies on computer-based work in the sit-stand condition are inconclusive about the role of gender differences (Karakolis et al., 2016; Pei et al., 2017). Results from this study suggest that the adoption of a sit-stand-walk intervention - combining sit-stand postural transitions with intermittent bouts of light-intensity physical activity – is not impacted by participant gender.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text