Assessment of environmental tobacco smoke and respirable suspended particle exposures for nonsmokers in Lisbon by personal monitoring
References (24)
- et al.
Indoor air quality in homes, offices and restaurants in Korean urban areas — Indoor/outdoor relationships
Atmos. Environ.
(1997) A review of the use of saliva continine as a marker of tobacco smoke exposure
Prev. Med.
(1990)- et al.
Determination of volatile organic compounds and respirable particulate matter in New Jersey and Pennsylvania homes and workplaces
Environ. Int.
(1996) Indoor air quality and environmental tobacco smoke: concentration and exposure
Environ. Int.
(1993)Lung cancer and passive smoking: association an artifact due to misclassification of smoking habits?
Toxicol. Lett.
(1987)- et al.
Composition of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) from international cigarettes and determination of ETS-RSP: Particulate marker ratios
Environ. Int.
(1997) - et al.
National incidence of smoking and misclasfication among the U.S. married female population
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
(1997) - et al.
The use of cigarette equivalents to assess environmental tobacco smoke exposure
Environ. Int.
(1997) - et al.
Assessment of personal exposures to environmental tobacco smoke in British nonsmokers
Environ. Int.
(1994) - et al.
Assessment of air quality in Barcelona by personal monitoring of nonsmokers for respirable suspended particles and environmental tobacco smoke
Environ. Int.
(1997)
Assessment of air quality in Turin by personal monitoring of nonsmokers for respirable suspended particles and environmental tobacco smoke
Environ. Int.
(1997)
Determination of nicotine and cotinine: comparison of GC and radioimmunoassay methods
Cited by (25)
Fine PM measurements: Personal and indoor air monitoring
2002, ChemosphereTobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study
2000, LancetCitation Excerpt :The first type of study monitored nonsmokers' secondhand smoke exposure using personal air samples. Pilot studies were done by the US Oak Ridge National Laboratory26–27 and UK Hazleton Laboratory;28 Hazleton subsequently did studies in the same countries as IARC,26–36 as well as in Asia and Latin America. Despite the reluctance of Hazleton's parent company, PM was eager to promote an interpretation of the studies' findings; later, the Aug 16, 1998, Sunday Telegraph reported that the studies demonstrated that “real-life levels” of secondhand smoke probably do not cause fatal diseases.37
Copyright © 1998 Published by Elsevier Ltd.