Reporting occupational injuries: The first step

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(96)00025-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Attempts to evaluate occupational injury surveillance systems have centered on employer compliance. Surveillance systems also rely on employees reporting injuries, and the reliability of such reporting is unknown. In this study of hospital environmental service workers, 29.2% (108 of 372) recalled having been injured in the previous year, and of these, 38.9% (42 of 108) had not reported one or more injuries. Among those injured, older workers (mean age 40.6 years vs. 36.2 years; p = 0.024) and those having worked longer at the same job (mean duration 6.7 years vs. 4.3 years; p = 0.032) were more likely to not report an injury. The most frequently cited reason for not reporting was that the injury had seemed too minor, though 64.4% of unreported injuries required medical care and 44.1% resulted in lost work time.

References (6)

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics

    Recordkeeping guidelines for occupational injuries and illnesses

    (1986)
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics

    BLS reports on survey of occupational injuries and illnesses in 1968

    BLS News

    (1987, November 12)
  • D.P. Discher et al.

    Pilot study for development of an occupational disease surveillance method

    (1975)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Assistant Professor for Research, Department of Emergency Health Services, University of Maryland at Baltimore County. He received his MD from the University of Miami and his PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Michigan.

View full text