Longitudinal assessment of sensory reactions in eyes and upper airways of staff in a sick building

https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(94)90132-5Get rights and content

Abstract

This investigation is part of a longitudinal study of the library building at Stockholm University involving a 33-week study period. The aim of this report is to utilize a portion of the questionnaire data (n=1721) in order to study how the members of the library staff n=68) responded to questions regarding sensations in their eyes and upper airways. Responses were given by encircling descriptors which described their perceptions “right now” on the two body sites. The descriptors were chosen from 67 and 76 descriptors used for the eyes and upper airways, respectively. The choices made showed that a somewhat larger portion of the staff had adverse perceptions in the upper airways (76.5%) than in the eyes (69.1%). Half of the staff (54.4%) described adverse effects for both eyes and upper airways. Although a larger number of adverse descriptors was used for the eyes than for the upper airways, more respondents described adverse effects in the upper airways than in the eyes. For the whole group, the positive and neutral descriptors decreased and the adverse descriptors increased from the morning to the afternoon. Generally, the adverse upper-airways descriptors increased in frequency while the adverse eyes descriptors increased selectively and thus changed the frequency pattern. The predominating adverse effect described for all conditions is a feeling of “dryness”. Cluster analyses based on the choice frequencies of eyes and upper-airways descriptors resulted in three groups of respondents: (1) A building-sensitive group who had adverse perceptions and are suspected SBS persons; (2) a moderately sensitive group whose perceptions tended to be adverse and who are suspected of reporting descriptors that are unrelated to the building and reflect their health status of the day; (3) a building-insensitive group whose perceptions were neutral or slightly positive.

References (55)

  • B. Berglund et al.

    Air quality and symptoms in a sick library building with a return-air ventilation system

  • B. Berglund et al.

    A longitudinal study of perceived air quality and comfort in a sick library building

  • B. Berglund et al.

    A longitudinal study of airborne chemical compounds in a sick library building

  • B. Berglund et al.

    Air quality and symptoms in a sick library

  • B. Berglund et al.

    Humans as discerners of odor and irritation

  • S. Burge et al.

    Sick building syndrome: A study of 4373 office workers

    Ann. Occup. Hyg.

    (1987)
  • P.S. Burge et al.

    Validation of self-administered questionnaire in the diagnosis of sick building syndrome

  • R.B. Cattell

    Factor analysis

    (1952)
  • T. Finger et al.

    Neurobiology of taste and smell

    (1986)
  • M.J. Finnegan et al.

    The sick building syndrome: Prevalence studies

    Brit. Med. J.

    (1984)
  • C. Franck

    Eye symptoms and signs in building with indoor climate problems (“office age syndrome”)

    Acta Ophthalmol.

    (1986)
  • C. Franck et al.

    Objective signs of eye irritation in buildings suspected of causing indoor climate problems

  • C. Franck et al.

    Evaluation of two different questionnaires used for diagnosing ocular manifestations in the sick building syndrome on the basis of an objective index

    Indoor Air J.

    (1991)
  • A. Hedge

    Evidence of a relationship between office design and self-reports of ill-health among office workers in the United Kingdom

    J. Architect. Plann. Res.

    (1984)
  • J.J.K. Jaakkola

    Indoor air in office building and human health. Experimental and epidemiologic study of the effects of mechanical ventilation

  • J.J.K. Jaakkola et al.

    Mechanical ventilation in office buildings and its effect on the sick building syndrome

    Indoor Air J.

    (1991)
  • J.J.K. Jaakkola et al.

    The effect of air recirculation on symptoms and environmental complaints in office workers. A double-blind, four period cross-over study

  • Cited by (10)

    • Indoor air pollutants in office environments: Assessment of comfort, health, and performance

      2013, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      The development at low concentrations as in the indoor environment would be characterized by latency, i.e. the symptom is delayed in contrast to the immediate odour perception. Latency of reporting was observed in city halls and libraries, where the prevalence of “irritation symptoms” increased during a working day (Baird et al., 1994; Skov et al., 1989; X). However, whether there was a direct association with sensory irritants is not known, or exacerbation by other risk factors has occurred.

    • "Healthy" eye in office-like environments

      2008, Environment International
    • Measurement in psychology

      2013, Measurement With Persons: Theory, Methods, and Implementation Areas
    • Measurement in psychology

      2013, Measurement with Persons: Theory, Methods, and Implementation Areas
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text