A methodological framework for assessing health indices

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Tests or measures in clinical medicine or the social sciences can be used for three purposes: discriminating between subjects, predicting either prognosis or the results of some other test, and evaluating change over time. The choices made at each stage of constructing a quality of life index will differ depending on the purpose of the instrument. We explore the implications of index purpose for each stage of instrument development: selection of the item pool, item scaling, item reduction, determination of reliability, of validity, and of responsiveness. At many of these stages, not only are the requirements for discriminative, predictive, and evaluative instruments not complementary, they are actually competing. Attention to instrument purpose will clarify the choices both for those developing quality of life measures and for those selecting an appropriate instrument for clinical studies.

References (26)

  • FrankenburgWK et al.

    The revised DDST: its accuracy as a screening instrument

    J Paediatr

    (1971)
  • SpitzerWO et al.

    Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients

    J Chron Dis

    (1981)
  • SackettDL et al.

    The development and application of indices of health: general methods and a summary of results

    Am J Publ Health

    (1977)
  • ParkersonGR et al.

    The Duke-UNC health profile

    Med Care

    (1981)
  • KaplanRM et al.

    Health status: types of validity and the index of well being

    Health Ser Res

    (1976)
  • BombardierC et al.

    A methodological framework to develop and select indices for clinical trials: statistical and judgmental approaches

    J Rheumatol

    (1982)
  • HathawayS et al.

    Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory

    (1951)
  • MaddocksGL et al.

    Planning Services for Older People: Translating National Objectives into Effective Programs

    (1976)
  • National Center for Health Statistics

    Health Interview Survey Procedures, 1957–1974

  • SornaGP et al.

    Lung cancer

  • KaplanRM et al.

    Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis

    Health Psychol

    (1982)
  • SpitzerWO et al.

    The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner

    N Engl J Med

    (1974)
  • BergnerM et al.

    The sickness impact profile development and final revision of a health status measure

    Med Care

    (1981)
  • Cited by (1318)

    • Reliability and validation of the German Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score

      2024, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text