Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Associations between Inter-Pregnancy Interval and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Brazil

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Global estimates of maternal and perinatal mortality have remained unchanged over the past 20 years, and strategies are being sought to decrease the occurrence of maternal and perinatal death. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between inter-pregnancy interval and the occurrence of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Methods

Design and Setting: Cross-sectional study of the obstetrical and perinatal records in an intra-hospital obstetrics database between 1986 and 2000 at a tertiary maternity hospital in Brazil. Participants: A total of 14,930 records of parous women who delivered singleton infants. Main outcome measures: Crude and adjusted odds ratio estimates of gestational outcome according to inter-pregnancy intervals.

Results

During the period of the study, 34.6% of records referred to women with an inter-pregnancy interval <18 months. After the adjustment performed for 11 confounding factors and assuming an inter-pregnancy interval of 18–23 months as reference, short intervals (<6 months) were observed to be associated with a greater risk of low birth weight (odds ratio: 1.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.18–2.55), and preterm birth (1.56; 1.01–2.46). On the other hand, long intervals were significantly associated with fewer C-sections (0.69; 0.56–0.82), and a greater risk of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (1.57; 1.20–2.06) and low birth weight (1.46; 1.03–2.06).

Conclusions

Short inter-pregnancy intervals are associated with a higher risk of low birth weight and preterm birth, while long intervals are associated with a higher risk of PROM, low birth weight and a lower risk of C-section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norton, M. (2005). New evidence on birth spacing: Promising findings for improving newborn, infant, child and maternal health. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 89 (Suppl1), S1–S6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rousham, E. K., & Gracey, M. (2002). Factors affecting birthweight of rural Australian Aborigines. Annals of Human Biology, 29, 363–372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, P. D., & Lin, R. S. (1999). Perinatal mortality in Taiwan. Public Health, 113, 27–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eastman, N. J. (1944). The effect of interval between births on maternal and fetal outlook. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 47, 445–466.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu, B. P. (2005). Effect of inter-pregnancy interval on birth outcomes: Findings from three recent US studies. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 89(Suppl1), S25–S33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Conde-Agudelo, A., Rosas-Bermúdez, A., & Kafury-Goeta, A. C. (2006). Birth spacing, risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 295(15), 1809–1823.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ronsmans, C., & Campbell, O. (1998). Short birth intervals don’t kill women: evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 29, 282–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Razzaque, A., Da Vanzo, J., Rahman, M., et al. (2005). Pregnancy spacing and maternal morbidity in Matlab, Bangladesh. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 89 (Suppl1), S41–S49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conde-Agudelo, A., & Belizán, J. M. (2000). Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with pregnancy interval: cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, 321, 1255–1259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Capurro, H., Konichezky, S., Fonseca, D., & Caldeyro-Barcia, R. (1978). A simplified method for diagnosis of gestational age in the newborn infant. The Journal of Pediatrics, 93(1), 120–122 Jul.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ballard, J. L., Khoury, J. C., Wedig, K., Wang, L., Eilers-Walsman, B. L., & Lipp, R. (1991). New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. The Journal of Pediatrics, 119(3), 417–423.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, J. E. (1991). Birth intervals and perinatal health: An investigation of three hypotheses. Family Planning Perspectives, 23, 62–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smits, L. J., & Essed, G. G. (2001). Short inter-pregnancy intervals and unfavourable pregnancy outcome: Role of folate depletion. Lancet, 358, 2074–2077.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu, B. P., Rolfs, R. T., Nangle, B. E., & Horan, J. M. (1999). Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 589–594.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, B. P., Haines, K. M., Le, T., McGrath-Miller, K., & Boulton, M. L. (2001). Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes among white and black women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 185, 1403–1410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu, B. P., & Le, T. (2003). Effect of inter-pregnancy interval on infant low birth weight: A retrospective cohort study using the Michigan Maternally Linked Birth Data. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 7, 169–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Amaral, E., Souza, J. P., Surita, F., Sousa, M. H., Cecatti, J. G., & Campbell, O. (2006). A population-based surveillance study on severe acute maternal morbidity (near-miss) in Campinas, Brazil: The Vigimoma Project. XVIII FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Abstract Book 2, 96.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially funded by FAPESP (Foundation of Support to Research of the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil), grant award 02/02478–0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José G. Cecatti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cecatti, J.G., Correa-Silva, E.P.B., Milanez, H. et al. The Associations between Inter-Pregnancy Interval and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Brazil. Matern Child Health J 12, 275–281 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0219-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0219-y

Keywords

Navigation