Abstract
Background
Smoke is generated by energy-based surgical instruments. The airborne byproducts may have potential health implications. This study aimed to evaluate the properties of surgical smoke and the evidence for the harmful effects to the theater staff.
Methods
Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase classic and Embase, and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials were searched for studies reporting the constituents found in the smoke plume created during surgical procedures, the methods used to analyze the smoke, the implications of exposure, and the type of surgical instrument that generated the smoke. Studies were excluded if they were animal based, preclinical experimental work, or opinion-based reports. The common end points were particle size and characteristics, infection risk, malignant spread, and mutagenesis.
Results
The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 20 studies. In terms of particle size, 5 (25 %) of the 20 studies showed that diathermy and laser can produce ultrafine particles (UFP) that are respirable in size. With regard to particle characterization, 7 (35 %) of the 20 studies demonstrated that a variety of volatile hydrocarbons are present in diathermy-, ultrasonic-, and laser-derived surgical smoke. These are potentially carcinogenic, but no evidence exists to support a cause–effect relationship for those exposed. In terms of infection risk, 6 (30 %) of the 20 studies assessed surgical smoke for the presence of viruses, with only 1 study (5 %) positively identifying viral DNA in laser-derived smoke. One study (5 %) demonstrated bacterial cell culture (Staphylococcus aureus) from a laser plume after surgery. Regarding mutagenesis and malignant spread, one study (5 %) reported the mutagenic effect of smoke, and one study (5 %) showed the presence of malignant cells in the smoke of a patient undergoing procedures for carcinomatosis.
Conclusions
The potentially carcinogenic components of surgical smoke are sufficiently small to be respirable. Infective and malignant cells are found in the smoke plume, but the full risk of this to the theater staff is unproven. Future work could focus on the long-term consequences of smoke exposure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Massarweh NN, Cosgriff N, Slakey P (2006) Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses. J Am Coll Surg 202:520–530
Lawrentschuk N, Fleshner NE, Bolton DM (2010) Laparoscopic lens fogging: a review of etiology and methods to maintain a clear visual field. J Endourol 24:905–913
Spruce L, Braswell ML (2012) Implementing AORN-recommended practises for electrosurgery. AORN J 96:373–388
British Occupational Hygiene Society (2006) COSHH guidance: surgical smoke. Retrieved 7 January 2013 at http://www.bohs.org/uploadedFiles/Groups/Pages/Surgical_smoke.pdf
The National Institute for Occupation Safety and Health (1996) Control of smoke from laser/electric surgical procedures. Retrieved 7 January 2013 at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/hazardcontrol/pdfs/hc11.pdf
CSA Group (2009) Surgical, diagnostic, therapeutic, aesthetic plume scavenging. Retrieved 7 January 2013 at http://www.csa.ca/cm/ca/en/home
Edwards BE, Reiman RE (2008) Results of a survey on current surgical smoke control practices. AORN J 87:739–749
Edwards BE, Reiman RE (2012) Comparison of current and past surgical smoke control practices. AORN J 95:337–350
Barrett WL, Garber SM (2003) Surgical smoke: a review of the literature. Surg Endosc 17:979–987
PRISMA (2012) PRISMA transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Retrieved 19 December 2012 at http://www.prisma-statement.org/statement.htm
Centre for EBM Levels of Evidence (2012) Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine: levels of evidence. Retrieved 19 December 2012 at http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025
Andreasson SN, Anundi H, Sahlberg B, Ericsson CG, Walinder R, Enlund G, Pahlman L, Mahteme H (2009) Peritonectomy with high-voltage electrocautery generates higher levels of ultrafine smoke particles. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:780–784
Bruske-Hohfeld I, Preissier G, Jauch KW, Pitz M, Nowak D, Peters A, Wichmann HE (2008) Surgical smoke and ultrafine particles. J Occup Med Toxicol 3:31
DesCoteaux JG, Picard P, Poulin E, Baril M (1996) Study of electrocautery smoke particles produced in vitro and during laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 10:152–158
Nezhat C, Winer WK, Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Forrest D, Reeves WG (1987) Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard? Lasers Surg Med 7:376–382
Smith J, Yeh HC, Muggenburg B, Guilmette R, Martin LS, Strine PW (1992) Study design for the characterization of aerosols during surgical procedures. J Scand J Work Environ Health 18(Suppl 2):106–109
Fitzgerald JE, Malik M, Ahmed I (2012) A single-blind controlled study of electrocautery and ultrasonic scalpel smoke plumes in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 26:337–342
Hollmann R, Hort CE, Kammer E, Naegele M, Sigrist MW, Meuli-Simmen C (2004) Smoke in the operating theatre: an unregarded source of danger. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:458–463
Lin YW, Fan SH, Chang KH, Huang CS, Tang CS (2010) A novel inspection protocol to detect volatile compounds in breast surgery electrocautery smoke. J Formos Med Assoc 109:511–516
Moot AR, Ledingham KM, Wilson PF, Senthilmohan ST, Lewis DR, Roake J, Allardyce R (2007) Composition of volatile organic compounds in diathermy plume as detected by selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry. Anz J Surg 77:20–23
Sagar PM, Meagher A, Sobczak S, Wolff BG (1996) Chemical composition and potential hazards of electrocautery smoke. Br J Surg 83:1792
Weston R, Stephenson RN, Kutarski PW, Parr NJ (2009) Chemical composition of gases surgeons are exposed to during endoscopic urological resections. Urology 74:1152–1155
Wu YC, Tang CS, Huang HY, Liu CH, Chen CH, Chen CR, Lin YW (2011) Chemical production in electrocautery smoke by a novel predictive model. Eur Surg Res 46:102–107
Abramson AL, Dilorenzo TP, Steinberg BM (1990) Is papillomavirus detectable in the plume of laser-treated laryngeal papilloma? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:604–607
Capizzi PJ, Clay RP, Battey MJ (1998) Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume debris. Lasers Surg Med 23:172–174
Hughes PSH, Hughes AP (1998) Absence of human papillomavirus DNA in the plume of erbium: YAG laser-treated warts. J Am Acad Dermatol 38:426–428
Kunachak S, Sithisarn P, Kulapaditharom (1996) Are laryngeal papillomavirus-infected cells viable in the plume derived from a continuous mode carbon dioxide laser, and are they infectious? a preliminary report on one laser mode. J Laryngol Otol 110:1031–1033
Sawchuk WS, Weber PJ, Lowy DR, Dzubow LM (1989) Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: detection and protection. J Am Acad Dermatol 21:41–49
Wisniewski PM, Warhol MJ, Rando RF, Sedlacek TV, Kemp JE, Fisher JC (1990) Studies on transmission of viral disease via the CO2 laser plume and ejecta. J Reprod Med 35:1117–1123
Gatti JE, Bryant CJ, Noone RB, Murphy JB (1992) The mutagenicity of electrocautery smoke. Reconstr Surg 89:781–784
Ikramuddin S, Lucas J, Ellison EC, Schirmer WJ, Melvin WS (1998) Detection of aerosolised cells during carbon dioxide laparoscopy. J Gastro Surg 2:580–583
Ulmer BC (2008) The hazards of surgical smoke. AORN J 87:721–734
Sanderson C (2012) Surgical smoke. J Perioper Pract 22:122–128
Lewin JM, Brauer JA, Ostad A (2011) Surgical smoke and the dermatologist. J Am Acad Dermatol 65:636–641
Donaldson K, Brown D, Clouter A, Duffin R, Macnee W, Renwick L, Tran L, Stone V (2002) The pulmonary toxicology of ultrafine particles. J Aerosol Med 15:213–220
Gates MA, Feskanich D, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE (2007) Operating room nursing and lung cancer risk in a cohort of female registered nurses. Scand J Work Environ Health 33:140–147
Medicines and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency (2008) Guidance on the safe use of lasers, intense light source systems and LEDs in medical, surgical, dental, and aesthetic practices. Retrieved 4 December 2012 at http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/dtsiac/documents/publication/con014843.pdf
American National Standard (2007) American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers Institute. Retrieved 7 January 2013 at http://www.lia.org/PDF/Z136_1_s.pdf
Acknowledgments
James Ansell was sponsored by The Royal College of Surgeons of England Research Fellowship Grant.
Disclosures
Nicholas Mowbray, James Ansell, Neil Warren, Pete Wall, and Jared Torkington have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mowbray, N., Ansell, J., Warren, N. et al. Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27, 3100–3107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2940-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2940-5