Abstract
Objective
Questionnaires for assessment of biomechanical exposure are frequently used in surveillance programs, though few studies have evaluated which key questions are needed. We sought to reduce the number of variables on a surveillance questionnaire by identifying which variables best summarized biomechanical exposure in a survey of the French working population.
Methods
We used data from 2002 to 2003 French experimental network of Upper-limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders (UWMSD), performed on 2,685 subjects in which 37 variables assessing biomechanical exposures were available (divided into four ordinal categories, according to the task frequency or duration). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with orthogonal rotation was performed on these variables. Variables closely associated with factors issued from PCA were retained, except those highly correlated to another variable (ρ > 0.70). In order to study the relevance of the final list of variables, correlations between a score based on retained variables (PCA score) and the exposure score suggested by the SALTSA group were calculated. The associations between the PCA score and the prevalence of UWMSD were also studied. In a final step, we added back to the list a few variables not retained by PCA, because of their established recognition as risk factors.
Results
According to the results of the PCA, seven interpretable factors were identified: posture exposures, repetitiveness, handling of heavy loads, distal biomechanical exposures, computer use, forklift operator specific task, and recovery time. About 20 variables strongly correlated with the factors obtained from PCA were retained. The PCA score was strongly correlated both with the SALTSA score and with UWMSD prevalence (P < 0.0001). In the final step, six variables were reintegrated.
Conclusion
Twenty-six variables of 37 were efficiently selected according to their ability to summarize major biomechanical constraints in a working population, with an approach combining statistical analyses and existing knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balogh I, Orbaek P, Winkel J, Nordander C, Ohlsson K, Ektor-Andersen J (2001) Questionnaire-based mechanical exposure indices for large population studies–reliability, internal consistency and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health 27:41–48
Bernard BP (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, the upper-limb, and low back. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, pp 97–141
Buckle P, Devereux JJ (1999) Work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Eur Agency Saf Health Work, Bilbao, pp 1–117
Chen Y, Meyer JD, Song J, McDonald JC, Cherry N (2002) Reliability assessment of a coding scheme for the physical risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 28:232–237
Cleall JF, BeGole EA, Chebib FS (1979) Craniofacial morphology: a principal component analysis. Am J Orthod 75:650–666
Colombini D, Occhipinti E, Delleman N, Fallentin N, Kilbom A, Grieco A (2001) Exposure assessment of upper limb repetitive movements: a consensus document developed by the Technical Committee on Musculoskeletal Disorders of International Ergonomics Association (IEA) endorsed by International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH). G Ital Med Lav Ergon 23:129–142
Fallissard B (1998) Comprendre et utiliser les statistiques dans les sciences de la vie. Masson, Paris
Gangopadhyay S, Gupta A, Nachabe MH (2001) Evaluation of ground water monitoring network by principal component analysis. Ground Water 39:181–191
Hagberg M, Silverstein BA, Wells R, Smith MJ, Herbert R, Hendrick HW, Carayon P, Pérusse M (1997) Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). A reference book for prevention. Taylor and Francis, Bristol
Hansson GA, Balogh I, Bystrom JU, Ohlsson K, Nordander C, Asterland P, Sjolander S, Rylander L, Winkel J, Skerfving S (2001) Questionnaire versus direct technical measurements in assessing postures and movements of the head, upper back, arms and hands. Scand J Work Environ Health 27:30–40
Heberger K, Keszler A, Gude M (1999) Principal component analysis of measured quantities during degradation of hydroperoxides in oxidized vegetable oils. Lipids 34:83–92
Juul-Kristensen B, Jensen C (2005) Self-reported workplace related ergonomic conditions as prognostic factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: the “BIT” follow up study on office workers. Occup Environ Med 62:188–194
Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersson G, Jorgensen K (1987) Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 18:233–237
Lagerstrom M, Wenemark M, Hagberg M, Hjelm EW (1995) Occupational and individual factors related to musculoskeletal symptoms in five body regions among Swedish nursing personnel. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 68:27–35
Leclerc A (2005) Exposure assessment in ergonomic epidemiology: is there something specific to the assessment of biomechanical exposures? Occup Environ Med 62:143–144
Leclerc A, Landre MF, Chastang JF, Niedhammer I, Roquelaure Y (2001) Upper-limb disorders in repetitive work. Scand J Work Environ Health 27:268–278
Leijon O, Wiktorin C, Harenstam A, Karlqvist L (2002) Validity of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing physical work loads in a general population. J Occup Environ Med 44:724–735
Lin Z, Altman RB (2004) Finding haplotype tagging SNPs by use of principal components analysis. Am J Hum Genet 75:850–861
Melchior M, Roquelaure Y, Evanoff B, Chastang JF, Ha C, Imbernon H, Goldberg JF, Leclerc A (2006) Pays de la Loire Study Group. Why are manual workers at high risk of upper limb disorders? The role of physical work factors in a random sample of workers in France (the Pays de la Loire study). Occup Environ Med 63:754–761
Murray V, McKee I, Miller PM, Young D, Muir WJ, Pelosi AJ, Blackwood DH (2005) Dimensions and classes of psychosis in a population cohort: a four-class, four-dimension model of schizophrenia and affective psychoses. Psychol Med 35:499–510
Nakache JP, Confais J (2005) Approche pragmatique de la classification. Technip, Paris
Niedhammer I (2002) Psychometric properties of the French version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire: a study of the scales of decision latitude, psychological demands, social support, and physical demands in the GAZEL cohort. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:129–144
Niedhammer I, Siegrist J, Landre MF, Goldberg M, Leclerc A (2000) [Psychometric properties of the French version of the Effort-Reward Imbalance model]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 48:419–437
Roquelaure Y, Ha C, Leclerc A, Touranchet A, Sauteron M, Melchior M, Imbernon E, Goldberg JF and 80 occupational physicians of the Pays de la Loire Region (2006) Epidemiological Surveillance of Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders in the working Population: the French Pays de la Loire Study. Arthritis Rheum 55:765–778
Roquelaure Y, Mariel J, Fanello S, Boissiere JC, Chiron H, Dano C, Bureau D, Penneau-Fontbonne D (2002) Active epidemiological surveillance of musculoskeletal disorders in a shoe factory. Occup Environ Med 59:452–458
Sluiter BJ, Rest KM, Frings-Dresen MH (2001) Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 27(Suppl 1):1–102
Spielholz P, Silverstein B, Stuart M (1999) Reproducibility of a self-report questionnaire for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder risk factors. Appl Ergon 30:429–433
Stock SR, Fernandes R, Delisle A, Vezina N (2005) Reproducibility and validity of workers’ self-reports of physical work demands. Scand J Work Environ Health 31:409–437
van der Windt DA, Thomas E, Pope DP, de Winter AF, Macfarlane GJ, Bouter LM, Silman AJ (2000) Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 57:433–442
Viikari-Juntura E, Rauas S, Martikainen R, Kuosma E, Riihimaki H, Takala EP, Saarenmaa K (1996) Validity of self-reported physical work load in epidemiologic studies on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 22:251–259
Acknowledgments
The “Pays de la Loire” survey was conducted with financial support from the French National Institute for Public Health Surveillance (InVS). We are grateful to Maria Melchior for her help on principal component analysis and Diane Cyr for her help in improving the English of the manuscript. We are also grateful to the 80 occupational physicians involved in the sentinel network: Doctors Abonnat, Banon, Bardet, Benetti, Becquemie, Bertin, Bertrand, Bidron, Biton, Bizouarne, Boisse, Bonamy, Bonneau, Bouguer, Bouguer-Diquelou, Bourut-Lacouture, Breton, Caillon, Cesbron, Chisacoff, Chotard, Compain, Coquin-Geogeac, Cordes, Couet, Coutand, Daniellou, Darcy, Davenas, De Lescure, Delansalut, Dupas, Evano, Fontaine, Frampas-Chotard, Guiller, Guillimin, Harinte, Harrigan, Hervio, Hirigoyen, Jahan, Joliveau, Jube, Kalfon, Laine-Colin, Laventure, Le Dizet, Lechevalier, Leclerc, Ledenvic, Leroux, Leroy-Maguer, Levrard, Levy, Logeay, Lucas, Mallet, Martin, Mazoyer, Meritet, Michel, Migne-Cousseau, Moisan, Page, Patillot, Pinaud, Pineau, Pizzala, Plessis, Plouhinec, Raffray, Roussel, Russu, Saboureault, Schlindwein, Soulard, Thomson, Treillard, Tripodi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Descatha, A., Roquelaure, Y., Evanoff, B. et al. Selected questions on biomechanical exposures for surveillance of upper-limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81, 1–8 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0180-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0180-5