Skip to main content
Log in

Use of hardware modified phones for exposure assessment in health studies in Australia: verification of compliance with standards

  • Scientific Papers
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most epidemiological studies investigating health effects of mobile telephone use have been criticised for poor quality of exposure assessment. Most used questionnaires which have limited precision to assess exposure. Clearly more relevant and direct methods of exposure assessment are needed. We describe the calibration of hardware modified phones (HMPs) for exposure assessment and dosimetry and verified their compliance with Australian and international standards. Specific energy absorption rate (SAR) values at various tilts and rotations and their combinations were obtained for the HMPs using a ‘DASY3’ SAR measuring system. Calibration involved placing HMPs on human head phantoms and taking measurements at 900 and 1800 MHz bands on right and left sides of the phantom. At 900MHz the maximum SAR obtained with HMPs at the touch position was 0.9W/kg and 0.4W/kg at 30 degrees tilt but at 1800MHz, SAR at the touch and 30 degrees tilts were 1.1W/kg and 1.3W/kg respectively. Whilst tilt and rotation each had an effect on SAR at constant frequency, no interaction was observed with rotation and frequency, however one was observed between tilt and frequency. At 1800 MHz mean SAR at 30 degrees tilt was 0.22W/kg higher (95% CI 0.15, 0.30) than at 0 degrees, whereas at 900 MHz mean SAR at 30 degrees tilt was 0.60W/kg lower (95% CI 0.52, 0.67) than at 0 degrees. Our results indicated that tilts influence SAR more than rotations. SAR values obtained at both 900/1800 MHz for the HMPs were well below ICNIRP limits for the general public. The phones were compliant with both international and Australian standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kheifets, L., Repacholi, M., Saunders, R. and van Deventer, E.The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields, Pediatrics,116(2): e303–13, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlbom, A., Green, A., Kheifets, L., Savitz, D. and Swerdlow, A.Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure, Environ Health Perspect, 112(17):1741–54, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nokia. Nokia in the community. 2005 [cited 2008 URL accessed on 10 June 2008]; Available from: http://www.nokia.com/A4138170.

  4. Funch, D.P., Rothman, K.J., Loughlin, J.E. and Dreyer, N.A.Utility of telephone company records for epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones, Epidemiology, 7(3):299–302, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Repacholi, M.H.Health risks from the use of mobile phones, Toxicol Lett, 120(1–3):323–31, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Diem, E., Schwarz, C., Adlkofer, F., Jahn, O. and Rudiger, H.Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSHR17 rat granulosa cells in vitro, Mutat Res, 583(2):178–83, 2005.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. French, P.W., Penny, R., Laurence, J.A. and McKenzie, D.R.Mobile phones, heat shock proteins and cancer, Differentiation, 67(4–5):93–7, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Christensen, H.C., Schuz, J., Kosteljanetz, M., Poulsen, H.S., Boice, J.D., Jr., McLaughlin, J.K., et al.Cellular telephones and risk for brain tumors: a population-based, incident casecontrol study, Neurology, 64(7):1189–95, 2005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Christensen, H.C., Schuz, J., Kosteljanetz, M., Poulsen, H.S., Thomsen, J. and Johansen, C.Cellular telephone use and risk of acoustic neuroma, Am J Epidemiol, 159(3): 277–83, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hardell, L., Hallquist, A., Mild, K.H., Carlberg, M., Pahlson, A. and Lilja, A.Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for brain tumours, Eur J Cancer Prev, 11(4):377–86, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hardell, L., Mild, K.H., Carlberg, M. and Soderqvist, F.Tumour risk associated with use of cellular telephones or cordless desktop telephones, World J Surg Oncol, 4:74, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardell, L., Nasman, A., Pahlson, A., Hallquist, A. and Hansson, Mild K.Use of cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumours: A case-control study, Int J Oncol, 15(1):113–6, 1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lonn, S., Ahlbom, A., Hall, P. and Feychting, M.Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor risk, Am J Epidemiol, 161(6):523–35, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rothman, K.J., Loughlin, J.E., Funch, D.P. and Dreyer, N.A.Overall mortality of cellular telephone customers, Epidemiology, 7(3): 303–5

  15. D’Costa, H., Trueman, G., Tang, L., Abdel-rahman, U., Abdelrahman, W., Ong, K. and Cosic, I.Human brain wave activity during exposure to radiofrequency field emissions from mobile phones, Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 26(4):162–7, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamblin, D.L. and Wood, A.W.Effects of mobile phone emissions on human brain activity and sleep variables, Int J Radiat Biol, 78(8):659–69, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Drossos, A., Santomaa, V. and Kuster, N.Dependence of electromagnetic energy absorption upon human head tissue composition in the frequency range of 300-3000 MHz, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 48(11II): 1988–95, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bit-Babik, G., Chou, C.K., Faraone, A., Gessner, A., Kanda, M. and Balzano, Q.Estimation of the SAR in the human head and body due to radiofrequency radiation exposure from handheld mobile phones with hands-free accessories, Radiation Research, 159(4): 550–7, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Collaboration. IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. Copyright 1999, IEE: Inst. Electr. & Electron. Eng., New York, NY, USA; 1999. Report No.: IEEE Std C95.1, 1999 Edition.

  20. Vrijheid, M., Armstrong, B.K., Bedard, D., Brown, J., Deltour, I., Iavarone, I., Krewski, D., Lagorio, S., Moore, S., Richardson, L., Giles, G.G., McBride, M., Parent, M., Siemiatycki, J. and Cardis, E.Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones, J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008.

  21. Lahkola, A., Tokola, K. and Auvinen, A.Meta-analysis of mobile phone use and intracranial tumors, Scand J Work Environ Health, Jun;32(3):171–7, 2006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parslow, R.C., Hepworth, S.J. and McKinney, P.A.Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets, Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 106(3):233–40, 2003.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Mild KH. Case-control study of the association between the use of cellular and cordless telephones and malignant brain tumors diagnosed during 2000–2003. Environ Res., 100(2):232–41, 2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Inyang, I., Benke, G., McKenzie, R. and Abramson, M.Comparison of measuring instruments for radiofrequency radiation from mobile telephones in epidemiological studies: Implications for exposure assessment, Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol., 18(2): 134–41, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hillert, L., Ahlbom, A., Neasham, D., Feychting, M., Jarup, L., Navin, R. and Elliot, P.Call-related factors influencing output power from mobile phones, J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol., 16(6): 507–14, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Inyang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inyang, I., Benke, G., McKenzie, R. et al. Use of hardware modified phones for exposure assessment in health studies in Australia: verification of compliance with standards. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 32, 62–67 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178630

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178630

Key words

Navigation