Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of Raynaud's phenomenon in different groups of workers operating hand-held vibrating tools

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In eight groups of subjects operating various hand-held vibrating tools and aged from 30 to 59 years, the prevalence rates of vibration-induced white finger (VWF) and numbness, pain, or stiffness in the upper and lower extremities were investigated. Hand-transmitted vibration levels (HTVLs) were measured on the back of the hand, by means of unidirectional (x-axis) vibration dosimeters, and the frequency-weighted acceleration levels [(Lh,w)eq,t] were determined as the vibration levels. The prevalence rates of VWF and numbness of the hands in these subjects were compared to the prevalence rates of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and numbness of the hands in 1027 males and 1301 females not occupationally exposed to vibration (age range: 30–59 years). It was observed that in subjects exposed to HTVLs of between 1.1 and 2.5 m/s2, the prevalence of VWF was between 0.0% and 4.8%. The prevalence of VWF reached 9.6% in a group of workers exposed to HTVLs of 2.7–5.1 tn/s2. The latter group showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the prevalence of VWF compared to the 2.7% prevalence of RP in male subjects of the general population. The prevalence of VWF in female subjects exposed to vibration (4.3%) was not significantly different from the prevalence of RP in females of the general population (3.4%). The prevalence rates of numbness of the hands were in the range of 6.5%–30.4% in the exposed groups and in the range of 13.4%–29.5% in the general population. Among the subjective symptoms, only VWF showed a significant positive correlation with HTVLs (R 2 = 0.5, P < 0.05). It was concluded that in decisions concerning quantitative recommendations for vibration exposure, the prevalence of VWF should be employed. With a view to decreasing the risk of developing VWF, estimated vibration safety values for 4 h and 2 h daily exposures are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arbejdstilsynet (1990) Hand-arm vibration (in Danish). Atcirkulœreskrivelse

  2. Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR) (1986) Mechanical vibrations and shock — guide for the assessment of human exposure to vibration transmitted to upper limbs (NE-E-90-402). France

  3. Bovenzi M, Franzinelli A, Strambi F (1988) Prevalence of vibration-induced white finger and assessment of vibration exposure among travertine workers in Italy. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 61:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bovenzi M, Petronio L, Marino F (1980) Epidemiological survey of shipyard workers exposed to hand-arm vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 46:251–266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brammer AJ, Taylor W, Lundborg G (1987) Sensorineural stages of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health 13:279–283

    Google Scholar 

  6. British Standard Institution (1987) British Standard Guide to measurement and evaluation of human response to vibration transmitted to the hand (BS 6842). London

  7. Futatsuka M, Ueno T (1986) A follow-up study of vibration-induced white finger due to chain saw operation. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:304–306

    Google Scholar 

  8. Futatsuka M, Yasutake N, Sakurai T, Matsumoto T (1985) Comparative study of vibration disease among operators of vibrating tools by factor analysis. Br J Ind Med 42:260–266

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gemne G, Lundström R, Hansson JE (1993) Disorders induced by work with hand-held vibrating tools (a review of current knowledge for criteria documentation). Arbete och Hälsa 6:1–83

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harada N, Ueda A, Takegata S (1991) Prevalence of Raynaud's phenomenon in Japanese males and females. J Clin Epidemiol 44:649–655

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hellstrøm B, Anderson KL (1972) Vibration injuries in Norwegian forest workers. Br J Ind Med 29:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  12. Inaba R, Ariizumi M, Nohara S, Okada A (1989) Prevalence of Raynaud's phenomenon in inhabitants in a mountain village in Hokuriku district (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Health Human Ecol 6:281–285

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Organization for Standardization (1986) Mechanical vibration — guidelines for the measurement and assessment of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration (ISO 5349). Geneva

  14. Iwata H (1991) Pathology and prevention of vibration syndrome (in Japanese). Jpn J Occup Health 374:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. Iwata H, Dupuis H, Hartung E (1972) Übertragung von horizontalen Sinusschwingungen auf die oberen Extremitäten bei Halbpronationsstellung und Reaktion des M. biceps (in German with English abstract). Int Arch Arbeitsmed 30:313–328

    Google Scholar 

  16. Iwata H, Makino S, Miyashita K (1987) Prevalence of Raynaud's phenomenon in individuals not using vibrating tools (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Ind Health 29:500–503

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klimkovà-Deutschovà E (1966) Neurologische Aspekte der Vibrationskrankheit. Int Arch Gewerbepat Gewerbehyg 22:297–305

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leppert J, Åberg H, Ringqvist I, Sörensson S (1987) Raynaud's phenomenon in female population: prevalence and association with other conditions. Angiology 38:871–877

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mirbod SM, Inaba R, Iwata H (1992) A study on the vibrationdose limit for Japanese workers exposed to hand-arm vibration. Ind Health 30:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mirbod SM, Yoshida H, Nagata C, Inaba R, Komura Y, Iwata H (1992) Hand-arm vibration syndrome and its prevalence in the present status of private forestry enterprises in Japan. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 64:93–99

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miyashita K, Morioka I, Tanaba T, Iwata H, Takeda S (1992) Symptoms of construction workers exposed to whole body vibration and local vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 64:347–351

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saito K (1987) Prevention of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health 13:301–304

    Google Scholar 

  23. Seppäläinen AM (1972) Peripheral neuropathy in forest workers: a field study. Work Environ Health 9:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  24. Silaman A, Holligan S, Brenon P, Maddison P (1990) Prevalence of symptoms of Raynaud's phenomenon in general practice. Br Med J 301:590–592

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sörensson A, Lundström R (1992) Transmission of vibration to the hand. J Low Freq Noise Vib 11:14–22

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor W, Brammer AJ (1982) Introduction to proceedings of 3rd international conference on hand-arm vibration. In: Brammer AJ, Taylor W (eds) Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. Wiley, New York, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor W, Pelmear PL (1975) Vibration white finger in industry. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thiede R, Miyashita K, Stelling J, Hartung E, Dupuis H (1993) Subjective vibration sensation under single- or multi-axial vibration exposure. In: Dupuis H, Christ E, Sandover J, Taylor W, Okada A (ds) Proceedings of the 6th international conference on hand-arm vibration. Druckzentrum Sutter, Essen, pp 451–460

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tokita Y, Okuma T (1990) Hand-arm transmitted vibration dosimeter. In: Okada A, Taylor W, Dupuis H (eds) Hand-arm vibration. Kyoei, Kanazawa, pp 53–57

    Google Scholar 

  30. Veiersted KB, Westgaard RH, Anderson P (1990) Pattern of muscle activity during stereotyped work and its relation to muscle pain. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 62:31–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Walker DD, Jones B, Ogston S, Tasker EG, Robinson AJ (1985) A study of white forger in the gas industry. Br J Ind Med 42:672–677

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weinrich MC, Maricq HR, Keil JE, McGregor AR, Diat F (1990) Prevalence of Raynaud's phenomenon in the adult population of South Carolina. J Clin Epidemiol 43:1343–1349

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xu Z, Ding HC, Ding MP, Liu JC, Wang H (1990) A study of dose-effect relationships for vibration-induced white finger. In: Okada A, Taylor W, Dupuis H (eds) Hand-arm vibration. Kyoei, Kanazawa, pp 305–308

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zeng-Shun Y, Hu C, Ling Q, De-Sheng Q, Ya-Hua Y (1986) Epidemiologic survey of vibration syndrome among riverters, chippers and grinders in the railroad system of the People's Republic of China. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:289–292

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou D, Chen L (1990) Research on the hygienic standard for hand-arm transmitted vibration in People's Republic of China. In: Okada A, Taylor W, Dupuis H (eds) Hand-arm vibration. Kyoei, Kanazawa, pp 309–311

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohammad Mirbod, S., Yoshida, H., Komura, Y. et al. Prevalence of Raynaud's phenomenon in different groups of workers operating hand-held vibrating tools. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 66, 13–22 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386574

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386574

Key words

Navigation