Regular Article
Nonlinearity in the Lung Cancer Dose–Response for Airborne Arsenic: Apparent Confounding by Year of Hire in Evaluating Lung Cancer Risks from Arsenic Exposure in Tacoma Smelter Workers

https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.1999.1341Get rights and content

Abstract

Most analytic studies of human epidemiologic data have affirmed the linear association between excess lung cancer risk and airborne arsenic exposure. Recent Canadian analyses, however, based on the mortality follow-up of Tacoma smelter workers from 1940–1976, provided strong evidence of a nonlinear dose–response when lung cancer risk was expressed in terms of the standardized mortality ratio. Using recently updated data covering ten additional years of mortality experience among Tacoma workers (1940–1986), new analyses were undertaken to further explore nonlinearity in the lung cancer dose–response in this worker cohort. Lung cancer risk was expressed in terms of both the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and the excess mortality rate (EMR). As in Canadian analyses, nonlinearity was assessed through a three parameter model containing both linear and negative exponential terms for dose. Dropping the negative-exponential dose-term lead to the standard suite of linear dose–response models, with and without intercept, used for comparative purposes. Analyses were undertaken by subcohort as there was strong evidence of confounding by year of initial hire, which largely explained the nonlinearity in the dose–response observed in Canadian analyses. Subcohort analyses based on initial employment, prior to 1940 or thereafter, showed that the nonlinearity in the dose–response was strongly influenced by date of initial hire. whether the cohort risk was measured by either the SMR or EMR, a nonlinear dose–response was evident only among workers hired prior to 1940. This, however, was strongly related to the artifactually low lung cancer mortality seen among workers hired between 1930 and 1939. Among workers hired after 1940, analyses showed that a linear dose–response provided a clearly superior fit. While analyses showed comparable goodness of fit when models were fitted to the SMR and EMR. Only those based on the EMR provided strong evidence of a dose–response. Overall, nonlinearity as observed in Canadian analyses was likely the result of several sources of bias not taken into account by Canadian investigators.

References (16)

  • J. Viren et al.

    Unit Risk Estimates for Airborne Arsenic Exposure: An Updated View Based on Recent Data from Two Copper Smelters

    Reg. Tox. Pharm.

    (1994)
  • N. Breslow

    Multivariate cohort analysis

    Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr.

    (1985)
  • N.E. Breslow et al.

    Statistical Methods in Cancer Research

    The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies

    (1987)
  • J.M. Chambers et al.

    Statistical Models

    (1991)
  • K.S. Crump et al.

    Methods for quantitative risk assessment using occupational studies

    Am. Stat.

    (1985)
  • P.E. Enterline et al.

    Cancer among workers exposed to arsenic and other substances in a copper smelter

    Am. J. Epidemiol.

    (1982)
  • P.E. Enterline et al.

    Exposure to arsenic and respiratory cancer: A reanalysis

    Am. J. Epidemiol.

    (1987)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • Size distribution and chemical composition of particulate matter stack emissions in and around a copper smelter

    2014, Atmospheric Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    Epidemiological studies have focused on the association between environmental exposure to air pollution (emissions of inorganic arsenic, sulphur dioxide and various heavy metals) and lung cancer risk, with indications of an increased risk of lung cancer of population living close to a Cu-smelter (Bessö et al., 2003). Other studies based on occupational exposure have also revealed an increase in relative risk of respiratory cancer for smelter workers in close contact with airborne As (Viren and Silvers, 1999; Lubin et al., 2000). Besides this relationship that exists, we must also take into account the exposure time, as it has been argued that short exposures to high concentrations are more harmful than more prolonged exposures at lower concentrations (Lubin et al., 2008).

  • An updated inhalation unit risk factor for arsenic and inorganic arsenic compounds based on a combined analysis of epidemiology studies

    2012, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Viren and Silvers (1999) fitted models to the Asarco cohort data using the same procedure as TCEQ with a slightly different model parameterization. After adjusting for the differences in model parameterizations, the TCEQ and Viren and Silvers (1999) parameters are identical. Viren and Silvers (1999), however, failed to adjust for the year of hire in their model fit to the total cohort.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text