Regular articleTHE CONCEPT OF NOISE ANNOYANCE: HOW INTERNATIONAL EXPERTS SEE IT
Abstract
The first part of this paper is a review of some definitions of noise annoyance which have been used explicitly or implicitly in major files and laboratory studies in different countries. This analysis shows wide differences. For instance, in some cases annoyance is seen as an outcome of disturbances, in other cases it is seen as an indication of the degree of helplessness with respect to the noise source. The second part is a report of an empirical study in which 68 noise research experts from seven different nations were asked (1) to indicate the main effect of noise, and (2) to rate the similarity between the concept “noise annoyance” and several related concepts. It turned out that (1) noise annoyance is seen as the major effect of noise, (2) that noise annoyance is a multi-faceted psychological concept, including behavioral, and evaluative aspects. Also, (3) the two aspects rated highest in similarity to annoyance are “nuisance” and “disturbance”, (4) although noise annoyance must be related to acoustic variables, acoustic characteristics do not play an overwhelming role in the concept of annoyance and (5) although experts from different languages agree upon the main components of the annoyance concept (e.g., nuisance, disturbance, and unpleasantness), there are some significant differences in the weights English, German, and Japanese speaking experts assign to several components (e.g., to nuisance, interference, irritation, and vexation). Whether these different weights are due to different concepts of annoyance, or due to different connotations of the related words in the respective languages, could not be analyzed with the data at hand.
References (0)
Cited by (236)
Road traffic noise annoyance mitigation by green window view: Optimizing green quantity and quality
2023, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningThere is convincing real-life evidence that seeing outdoor vegetation through the windows of one’s dwelling is able to mitigate negative health effects due to exposure to environmental noise, in particular for noise annoyance due to road traffic. However, design guidelines with respect to green quantity and quality to maximally benefit from this audio-visual interaction are currently lacking, but are mandatory when this idea is to be used in urban sound (and green) planning. Therefore, two virtual reality (VR) experiments were conducted, where participants were positioned near the window of a living room overlooking a city ring road, where the central reservation was used to design various greening scenarios. Participants were exposed to an A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level of 67 dB at eardrum (window partly opened). In the first experiment (79 participants), containing trees of two visually similar tree species, the optimal green quantity (using RGB greenness) was found to be near 30%. This effect, however, was not very pronounced and only amounted to 0.5 units on an 11-point noise annoyance scale. Only the very dense vegetation belt (50%) lead to a higher self-reported noise annoyance at the 5% statistical significance level. In the second VR experiment (62 other participants), vegetation quantity was fixed near this optimum, while green quality varied on the dimensions species richness, colorfulness, and maintenance degree. Green infrastructure containing most colors, or those containing most species, lead to a minimum in self-reported noise annoyance (0.7 units difference on the 11-point annoyance scale). Further analysis suggested that aesthetic value of the green infrastructure is the driving factor for the positive audio-visual interactions observed, consistent with the presumed mechanisms why green window view is able to reduce noise annoyance at home.
Constructing noise-reaction questions for community noise surveys in nine different languages. Experiences and lessons learned
2023, Applied AcousticsStudies of peoples’ reaction to community noise had been published since the early 1960ties, but differences in survey questions’ wordings had interfered with inter-survey comparisons. In 1993 an ICBEN team set the goal of creating high-quality survey questions that would yield internationally comparable measures of overall reactions to noise sources. After 7 years of discussions and research the team presented their recommendations. This paper presents some of the issues that were discussed by the ICBEN team and describes how they were dealt with.
The effects of rating scales and individual characteristics on perceived annoyance in laboratory listening tests
2023, Applied AcousticsThe issue of annoyance caused by noise has received considerable attention. There is evidence that annoyance assessment plays a crucial role in representing adverse sensory of noise. Although studies have provided some guidance for conducting annoyance assessment experiments, researchers have yet to systematically investigate the effect of rating scales, individual characteristics, and number of subjects on annoyance. This paper seeks to remedy such three problems by statistically analyzing annoyance from three listening tests (LT) in laboratory. Denote the scores of M subjects on K sounds as an M*K matrix, calculate the mean of each row to produce the mean subject score (MSS) of each subject, and similarly, calculate the mean of each matrix column to return the mean noise annoyance (MNA) of each noise sample. The first study found that the MNA and MSS calculated by 0 ∼ 100 linear scale (LT1) and 0 ∼ 10 category scale (LT2) both followed the Gaussian normal distribution, and the correlation between MNAs was 0.99. Statistical test results showed that there was no difference in MNAs and MSSs between the two listening tests, indicating that the rating scaling experiment results are independent of the type of the scale. Then, paired samples t-tests were used to assess whether individual characteristics (experimental environment/site, gender, occupation, age level, experimental experience, use/exposure to the noise source, and knowledge of acoustic) result in differences between MNAs. The test results revealed that the age and the familiarity of the target noise can lead to differences in the perceived annoyance of the subjects. Finally, in order to estimate the effect of the number of subjects on MNA, MNAs from various sample sizes were compared to those from a group of 88 subjects (linear scale) and a group of 104 subjects (category scale), respectively. The findings showed that the correlation coefficient between the MNA of 30 subjects and the MNA of 88 (or 104) individuals was greater than 0.98, and the maximum gap between MNAs is no more than 15 points on the 100-point linear scale (the gap was <1 point on the 9-level category scale). The conclusions presented here may facilitate application in laboratory sound quality assessment experiments.
Performance evaluation of speech masking design among listeners with varying language backgrounds
2022, Applied AcousticsSpeech masking is a technique used for protecting speech confidentiality, which is realised by adding maskers to cover target speech. Numerous studies have demonstrated the native and non-native differences in perceiving masked speech, but few have compared the effect of masker types from the perspective of effectiveness of speech privacy and their annoyance levels. This paper reports on the result of an English word perception task by native and non-native listeners where six types of maskers, both speech-like and non-speech-like, are implemented, as well as the annoyance levels of each masker. Natives, non-natives residing in an English-speaking country, and non-natives residing in a non-English-speaking country were tasked to write down sentences when masking sound was present, and also to rate the annoyance levels of the maskers. Results showed that language background significantly affected the performance of unmasked speech, the difference between the two non-native listeners became minimal in the presence of maskers, and maskers annoyed the listener groups differently, calling for a discussion in the selection of a universally effective masker to increase speech privacy.
Hyperacusis: Loudness intolerance, fear, annoyance and pain
2022, Hearing ResearchHyperacusis is a debilitating loudness intolerance disorder that can evoke annoyance, fear and aural facial pain. Although the auditory system seems to be the “central” player, hyperacusis is linked to more than twenty non-auditory medical disorders such as Williams syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, fibromyalgia, migraine, head trauma, lupus and acoustic shock syndrome. Neural models suggest that some forms of hyperacusis may result from enhanced central gain, a process by which neural signals from a damaged cochlea are progressively amplified as activity ascends rostrally through the classical auditory pathway as well as other non-auditory regions of the brain involved in emotions, memory and stress. Imaging studies have begun to reveal the extended neural networks and patterns of functional connectivity in the brain that enrich sounds with negative attributes that can make listening unbearable and even painful. The development of animal models of hyperacusis have enabled researcher to begin to critically evaluate the biological bases of hyperacusis, identify therapies to ameliorate the symptoms and gain a better understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in loudness coding in normal and hearing impaired subjects.
Investigating the effects of different levels and types of construction noise on emotions using EEG data
2022, Building and EnvironmentConstruction noise can affect human health and wellbeing through its negative effects on emotions. This study used EEG data to investigate the effects of different types and levels of construction noise on emotions. 23 participants were exposed to different types and levels of construction noise. Two different power spectral analysis, including the traditional approach and parametrizing neural power spectra, were used. The participants' responses regarding the effects of the noise conditions on their emotions in terms of annoyance and stress were also recorded using a questionnaire. To statistically analyze the data, linear mixed models analysis was employed in this study. The subjective data obtained from the questionnaires showed significant effects of the noise on the annoyance and stress perceived by the participants. The analysis of the EEG data also showed significant effects of different types and levels of construction noise on the brain signals. We found that different noise types and levels had significant effects on overall brain signal amplitude. The frontal lobe analysis results revealed that saw and jackhammer had the most negative emotional effects. The temporal lobe reacted differently to the noise types with different acoustic characteristics. The findings of this study will aid to identify the types and levels of construction noise with the most negative effects on human emotions. This would enable us to revisit occupational and environmental noise regulations to protect construction noise receivers against the noise levels and types with the most negative health effects.