Dependent variable 1: total number of LOE days | B | 95% CI | ||
Intercept | Intercept | 3.191 | 2.933 | 3.449 |
Pain group | Mild pain, functional impairment unlikely versus no pain | 0.116 | −0.087 | 0.320 |
Severe pain, functional impairment likely versus no pain | 0.511 | 0.300 | 0.722 |
Dependent variable 2: total amount of LOE benefits | ||||
Intercept | Intercept | 7.925 | 7.654 | 8.197 |
Pain Group | Mild pain, functional impairment unlikely versus no pain | 0.134 | −0.079 | 0.348 |
Severe pain, functional impairment likely versus no pain | 0.477 | 0.254 | 0.699 |
Dependent variable 3: total amount of healthcare expenditure benefits | ||||
Intercept | Intercept | 6.983 | 6.661 | 7.304 |
Pain group | Mild pain, functional impairment unlikely versus no pain | 0.479 | 0.225 | 0.732 |
Severe pain, functional impairment likely versus no pain | 1.259 | 0.997 | 1.522 |
Bold values indicate statistically significant estimate at the α=0.05 level. Analyses adjusted for age, sex, nature of injury and prior chronic conditions. Regression coefficients interpreted as a ‘β% increase’ in the dependent variable per each unit increase in the independent variable. For example in dependent variable 1 (total number of LOE days), the coefficient of mild pain functional impairment unlikely vs no pain (β=0.116) can be interpreted as: those with mild pain had a total number of LOE days 11.6% higher, on average, compared with those with no pain.
LOE, loss of earnings.