Table 1

Summary of findings of studies included in meta-analysis for spontaneous abortion

ReportExposureDeveloped countries and study period >1975Response rate ≥80%Prospective assessment of exposureQuantitative definition of lifting (weight/frequency)Adequate control of personals factorsAdequate control of other occupational exposuresValidity scoreRisk estimates (95% CI)*
(1) Light lifting or <12 kg
 Ahlborg et al 19 <12 kg, ≥10x/wk····· 15.00 0.97 (0.53 to 1.78)
 McDonald et al 22 None or light weight lifting···10.000.92 (0.89 to 0.95)†
(2) Lifting unspecified weight or ≥5 kg
 Ahlborg et al 19 Any weight,<10x /wk···· 14.00 1.03 (0.70 to 1.53)
 El-Metwalli et al 54 Lifting·7.002.04 (1.66 to 2.49)
 Eskenazi et al 55 >6.8 kg, ≥1x/d···11.501.14 (0.64 to 2.03)‡
 Fenster et al 56 >6.8 kg, ≥1x/d···· 14.50 0.97 (0.47 to 2.00)‡
 Florack et al 43 Lifting ≥1 hourx/d···· 13.00 1.07 (0.34 to 3.35)
 Lee and Jung57 >5 kg8.003.39 (2.06 to 5.60)
 McDonald et al 22 Medium weight lifting····10.001.11 (1.03 to 1.20)†
 Swan et al 58Gr.1§>6.8 kg··· 13.00 1.40 (0.78 to 2.60)
 Swan et al 58Gr.2¶>6.8 kg··· 13.00 1.10 (0.46 to 2.90)
 Swan et al 58Gr.3**>6.8 kg··· 13.00 1.50 (0.84 to 2.80)
(3) Heavy lifting or ≥10 kg−≤10x per day (≤50x/wk) or rarely
 Ahlborg et al 19 ≥12 kg, 10–50x/wk····· 15.00 1.11 (0.77 to 1.58)
 Axelsson et al 20 ≥10 kg, ≤50x/wk···10.000.89 (0.67 to 1.18)††
 Hansteen et al 59 Heavy lifting, daily or weekly··9.001.40 (1.04 to 1.88)‡‡
 Juhl et al 21
 (SA<13 wk)
11–20 kg or >20 kg, 1–10x/d····11.751.08 (0.85 to 1.38)§§
 Juhl et al 21
 (SA 13–21 wk)
11–20 kg or >20 kg, 1–10x/d····11.751.02 (0.79 to 1.31)§§
 Lerman et al 27 Heavy lifting, 5–25x/wk·7.000.47 (0.31 to 0.71)
 Taskinen et al 23 ≥10 kg, seldom·10.251.3 (0.4 to 3.9)
 Taskinen et al 24 >10 kg or patient transfers,
5–49x/wk
··10.001.2 (0.8 to 1.7)
 Zhang and Bracken60 >9 kg, <1x/d·····12.000.91 (0.43 to 1.93)¶¶
(4) Heavy lifting or ≥10 kg—unspecified frequency or ≥1x per day (≥5x/wk)
 Ahlborg et al 19 ≥12 kg, ≥10x/wk····· 15.00 1.16 (0.76 to 1.78)
 Axelsson et al 61 Heavy lifting·7.001.36 (0.91 to 2.02)
 Axelsson et al 62 Heavy lifting·6.750.99 (0.75 to 1.31)
 Elliott et al 63 Heavy lifting·7.500.69 (0.31 to 1.53)
 Hansteen et al 59 Heavy lifting, >1x/d··9.000.90 (0.65 to 1.25)‡‡
 Juhl et al 21
 (SA<13 wk)
11–20 kg and >20 kg, 1–10x/d····11.751.30 (1.06 to 1.60)
 Lerman et al 27 Heavy lifting, >25x/wk·7.000.51 (0.30 to 0.85)
  Maconochie et al 64 Heavy lifting··9.001.08 (0.85 to 1.38)
 McDonald et al 65 Heavy lifting···9.501.09 (0.98 to 1.21)‡‡
 McDonald et al 22 Heavy lifting,<15x/d····11.001.28 (1.18 to 1.39)†
 Zhang and Bracken60 >9 kg, ≥1x/d·····12.001.71 (1.25 to 2.32)¶¶
(5) Heavy lifting or ≥10 kg −≥10x per day (≥50x/wk) or often
 Ahlborg et al 19 ≥12 kg, >50x/wk····· 15.00 1.06 (0.62 to 1.81)
 Axelsson et al 20 ≥10 kg, >50x/wk···10.000.74 (0.46 to 1.19)
 Juhl et al 21
 (SA<13 wk)
11–20 kg or >20 kg, >10x/d····11.751.36 (0.96 to 1.92)***
 Juhl et al 21
 (SA 13–21 wk)
11–20 kg or >20 kg, >10x/d····11.751.21 (0.81 to 1.81)***
 McDonald et al 22 Heavy lifting, ≥15x/d····· 13.00 1.32 (1.17 to 1.48)†††
 Taskinen et al 23 ≥10 kg, continuously·10.255.7 (1.3 to 26.0)
 Taskinen et al 24 >10 kg or patient transfers, ≥50x/wk··10.503.4 (1.3 to 8.7)
  • High validity scores (> 12) are in bold.

  • A dot indicates that the feature is present in the study.

  • *ORs or relative risks.

  • †95% CI calculated using Epi Info with data provided in the report.

  • ‡RE obtained by combining the results corresponding to the three following exposure categories: (>6.8 kg, 1–9x/wk), (>6.8 kg, 10–15x/wk) and (>6.8 kg, >15x/wk), assuming non-independence for the 95 % CI.

  • §Group 1: Fabrication-room working women exposed to any etching fluoride or any photoresist and developer solvents.

  • ¶Group 2: Fabrication-room working women unexposed to any etching fluoride or any photoresist and developer solvents.

  • **Group 3: Non-fabrication working women.

  • ††RE obtained by combining the results corresponding to the two following exposure categories: (≥10 kg, <10x/ wk) and (≥10 kg, 10–50x/wk), assuming non independence for the 95 % CI.

  • ‡‡RE and 95% CI calculated using Epi Info with data provided in the report.

  • §§RE obtained by combining the results corresponding to the four following exposure categories: (11–20 kg, 1–3x/d), (11–20 kg, 4–10x/d), (>20 kg, 1–3x/d) and (>20 kg, 4–10x/d), assuming non independence for the 95% CI.

  • ¶¶Unexposed included non-working women but similar result is obtained after exclusion of non-working women.

  • ***RE obtained by combining the results corresponding to the two following exposure categories: (11–20 kg, >10x/d) and (>20 kg, >10x/d), assuming non independence for the 95% CI.

  • †††CI 95% from the following report: ‘The “Retrait Préventif”: An Evaluation’ by McDonald et al 66. Other RE obtained by period are 1.33 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.58) for SA <10 wk, 1.51 (1.30 to 1.73) for SA 10–15 wk and 1.61 (1.18 to 2.10) for SA 16–27 wk.

  • d, day; RE, risk estimate; SA, spontaneous abortion; wk, week.