Table 2

Relative frequencies of exposure assessment methods (EAM) according to study design extracted from articles on occupational pesticide exposures and various health outcomes

Study designCross-sectionalCohort (prospective)Cohort (retrospective)Case-control
N%N%N%N%
Number of articles43033.841732.8191.537529.5
Articles applying>1 EAM358.18520.4210.56717.9
Articles not reporting EAM61.430.710.3
Number of EAM occurrences in studies46631.450534.1201.344730.1
EAM:
Indirect EAM34974.938576.2199543096.2
Direct EAM11123.811723.215163.6
EAM not reported61.330.610.2
Indirect EAM:
Job title8618.56011.9840276
Expert case-by-case102.1204155011.2
Self-reported exposure:
self-administered
or interview administered questionnaire
20944.814628.931521247.4
Self-reported job history:
self-administered
or interview administered questionnaire
143112.27617
Registers81.75711.3525143.1
JEM30.6183.62104510.1
CEM20.410.2
TEM10.2
Algorithm/model122.55811.540.9
Index61.2
Score10.220.3
Metric10.2
Environmental monitoring61.340.8
GIS20.4
Direct EAM:
Biomonitoring:
Blood8017.27715.215132.9
Urine296.2356.930.7
Dermal
Hair10.2
Adipose tissue30.6
Personal air sampling20.410.2
  • CEM, crop exposure matrices; GIS, geographical information systems; JEM, job exposure matrices; TEM, task exposure matrices.