Table 5

Model-based LDCT eligibility criteria comparison1

MeasureBTMed risk model calibrated to Tammemagi model†NCCN category 1 or category 2 by BTMed predicted risk‡Tammemagi model§NCCN category 1 or category 2 by Tammemagi predicted risk¶
Proportion 50–80 years of age LDCT eligible (%)30.129.530.131.4
Sensitivity % (95% CI)76.0
(70.1 to 81.0)
72.7
(70.0 to 77.9)
70.5
(64.7 to 75.8)
71.6
(65.8 to 76.9)
Specificity % (95% CI)70.9
(70.1 to 71.7)
71.5
(70.7 to 72.3)
70.8
(70.0 to 71.6)
69.5
(68.7 to 70.4)
Positive predictive value % (95% CI)5.5
(4.8 to 6.3)
5.3
(4.6 to 6.1)
5.1
(4.4 to 5.8)
5.0
(4.3 to 5.7)
  • *Results based on the mortality cohort restricted to 12 508 workers 50–80 years of age at cohort entry and having an FEV1 >40% predicted.

  • †Predicted risk threshold for BTMed mortality risk that results in screening the same number of workers as the Tammemagi 2014 model applied to this cohort, with a risk threshold ≥1.3%. The comparable threshold for the 5-year risk of lung cancer mortality using the BTMed model was ≥0.86%.

  • ‡NCCN category 1 or category 2 with BTMed mortality risk ≥0.86%. Category 2 would be considered NCCN category 2a.8

  • §Tammemagi31 predicted 6-year lung cancer risk ≥1.3%, which results in the same number CT eligible as the USPSTF criteria in the PLCO cohort.

  • ¶NCCN category 1 or category 2 with Tammemagi31 predicted 6-year lung cancer risk ≥1.3%. Category 2 would be considered NCCN category 2a.8

  • BTMed, Building Trades National Medical Screening Program; FEV1, 1s force expiratory volume; LDCT, low-dose CT; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; PLCO, Prostate, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial; USPSTF, US Preventive Services Task Force.