Table 4

The effect on musculoskeletal pain at follow-up from working conditions in participants with one or more pain sites at baseline

Individual-level measurementJob exposure matrix (JEM)
Difference in mean number of painful body regions* P valuesDifference in mean number of painful body regions* P values
Continuous exposures
 Physical work demands, per one point increase of score (8–48)
   Men0.03<0.0010.04<0.001
   Women0.02<0.0010.02<0.001
 Quantitative demands, per one point increase score (1–5)
   Men−0.020.5407−0.63<0.001
   Women−0.020.5256−0.280.0268
 Emotional demands, per one point increase of score (1–5)
   Men0.000.8444−0.070.3024
   Women0.030.21880.060.1801
 Decision authority, per one point increase of score (1–5)
   Men−0.120.0001−0.480.0003
   Women−0.080.0096−0.280.0857
Dichotomous expsoures†
 Job strain
   Men0.080.1494−0.300.2181
   Women0.090.19790.220.5195
 High job insecurity
   Men0.050.52961.030.0011
   Women0.050.43220.270.4095
 Violence
   Men0.220.0943−0.040.8870
   Women0.160.04190.730.0002
  • *Adjusted for baseline musculoskeletal pain, age and education. The number of painful body regions ranges from 0 to 5.

  • †Association estimates for dichotomous exposures compare high versus low (violence and job strain: yes/no) in individual-level analyses and the risk associated with a 1% increased risk of exposure in JEM-level analyses.