Table 1

Distribution of asbestos lung burdens (million fibres longer than 5 µm per dry gram) in men and women

TEM asbestos lung burden in million fibres per dry gram (Average lung burden for lung cancers in brackets)*
Source of sample0−
(0.0092)
0.025−
(0.0364)
0.05−
(0.0854)
0.2−
(0.2930)
0.5−
(0.7690)
≥1.0
(2.0829)
Total
Males
 Mesothelioma18 (16.8%)8 (7.5%)33 (30.8%)21 (19.6%)15 (14.0%)12 (11.2%)107 (100%)
 Lung cancer105 (57.7%)22 (12.1%)41 (22.5%)8 (4.4%)4 (2.2%)2 (1.1%)182 (100%)
 OR (95% CI)1.00 (ref)2.12 (0.82 to 5.49)4.70 (2.38 to 9.25)15.31 (5.89 to 39.8)21.88 (6.52 to 73.4)35.00 (7.22 to 169.6)
Females
 Mesothelioma13 (50.0%)2 (7.7%)7 (26.9%)4 (15.4%)26 (100%)
 Lung cancer62 (77.5%)11 (13.8%)6 (7.5%)1 (1.3%)80 (100%)
 OR (95% CI)1.00 (ref)0.87 (0.17 to 4.39)6.36 (1.89 to 21.44)19.08 (1.97 to 184.91)
Both sexes†
 Mesothelioma26838231512122
 Lung cancer1673347942262
 Adjusted OR (95% CI)1.00 (ref)1.51 (0.62 to 3.65)4.81 (2.61,8.85)13.91 (5.69 to 34.0)21.52 (6.45 to 71.7)30.70 (6.38 to 147.7)
  • †Data for both sexes combined exclude 11 female mesothelioma cases born 1925–1939: 5 (TEM <0.025), 2 (TEM 0.025-), 2 (TEM 0.05-), 2 (TEM 0.2-). ORs for both sexes combined are adjusted for sex and year of birth (1940–1944, 1945–1949, 1950–1954).

  • *Mean lung burden of lung cancer samples in each category except the highest (≥1 mf/g). One lung cancer with 22.0 mf/g was recoded as 2.08 mf/g, the mean for the other lung cancer and the 12 mesotheliomas ≥1 mf/g. The mean for samples ≥1 mf/g was also set as 2.08 mf/g. Retaining the original value has little effect on the fitted model but distorts the lung burdens shown in table 3.

  • TEM, transmission electron microscopy.