Table 3

Estimates of the expected change during follow-up for lung function z-scores per unit change in predictor variables, when comparing farmers with controls (n=1058)

Regression modelΔzFEV1 (R2=0.13)ΔzFVC (R2=0.23)ΔzFEV1/FVC (R2=0.06)
E (95% CI)p ValueE (95% CI)p ValueE (95% CI)p Value
Control000
Farmer status
 Ex0.05 (−0.07 to 0.16)0.414−0.05 (−0.16 to 0.06)0.3930.14 (−0.01 to 0.29)0.074
 Current−0.07 (−0.19 to 0.05)0.272−0.09 (−0.21 to 0.03)0.139−0.01 (−0.17 to 0.15)0.932
Smoking
 Ex-smoker0.04 (−0.10 to 0.18)0.573−0.06 (−0.20 to 0.08)0.4020.15 (−0.04 to 0.34)0.123
 Current low−0.11 (−0.23 to 0.01)0.081−0.01 (−0.12 to 0.11)0.906−0.15 (−0.31 to 0.01)0.065
 Current high0.24 (0.35 to0.14)0.0000.10 (0.21 to0.003)0.0440.20 (0.33 to0.06)0.005
Second-hand smoking−0.08 (−0.16 to 0.01)0.0690.09 (0.17 to0.01)0.0250.04 (−0.07 to 0.15)0.465
Raised on a farm0.10 (0.01 to 0.18)0.0250.08 (0.000 to 0.16)0.0500.06 (−0.05 to 0.17)0.274
Baseline BHR−0.09 (−0.22 to 0.04)0.1900.13 (0.26 to0.005)0.0420.01 (−0.16 to 0.19)0.876
Follow-up BMI0.05 (0.06 to0.04)0.0000.07 (0.08 to0.06)0.0000.03 (0.02 to 0.05)0.000
  • Bold shows significance p<0.05.

  • BHR, bronchial hyper responsiveness; BMI, body mass index; E, estimate; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity.