Table 3

 Baseline and postintervention means of outcome variables by study group

Outcome variableIntervention group baseline means (n=56) (95% CI)Intervention group postintervention means (n=56) (95% CI)Control group baseline means (n=53) (95% CI)Control group postintervention means (n=53) (95% CI)
Regional pain severity
 Dominant proximal UE1.3 (1.0 to 1.6)0.7 (0.4 to 1.0)*1.5 (1.2 to 1.8)1.0 (0.7 to 1.3)*
 Non-dominant proximal UE1.4 (1.1 to 1.7)0.8 (0.5 to 1.2)*1.2 (0.9 to 1.4)0.8 (0.5 to 1.1)*
 Dominant distal UE0.5 (0.2 to 0.8)0.2 (−0.1 to 0.5)0.4 (0.2 to 0.6)0.3 (0.0 to 0.6)
 Non-dominant distal UE0.3 (0.1 to 0.4)0.2 (−0.1 to 0.5)0.3 (0.0 to 0.5)0.2 (0.0 to 0.4)
RULA non-neutral posture magnitude
 Dominant UE19.5 (18.2 to 20.9)15.2 (14.0 to 16.7)*18.8 (17.3 to 20.4)21.7 (20.4 to 22.5)*
 Non-dominant UE16.3 (15.1 to 17.5)11.9 (10.7 to 13.1)*16.2 (14.8 to 17.7)19.5 (16.9 to 22.0)*
 Spine and lower extremities9.7 (8.8 to 10.6)9.6 (8.8 to 10.3)9.2 (8.2 to 10.2)9.2 (8.0 to 10.1)
 Full dominant RULA29.2 (27.4 to 31.1)26.5 (25.2 to 27.9)*28.0 (25.8 to 30.2)30.3 (28.1 to 32.2)*
 Full non-dominant RULA26.0 (24.2 to 27.8)23.1 (23.4 to 24.9)*25.4 (23.1 to 27.7)28.1 (25.8 to 30.2)*
Hand activity level (HAL) repetition
 Dominant UE4.1 (3.7 to 4.6)3.7 (3.2 to 4.1)4.1 (3.6 to 4.5)4.5 (4.1 to 4.9)
 Non-dominant UE2.4 (1.9 to 2.9)3.9 (3.3 to 4.4)*2.1 (1.7 to 2.5)2.0 (1.6 to 2.3)
  • *Paired t tests were used to compare preintervention and postintervention means for the intervention group and control group and were considered statistically significant at p≤0.05.

  • Lower values postintervention indicate a decrease in pain severity, non-neutral posture and hand activity.

  • RULA, rapid upper limb assessment; UE, upper extremity.