TableĀ 3

Sensitivity of different scenarios for the impact of lifting devices in healthcare settings on the annual prevalence of LBP and MSD injury claims in a hypothetical cohort of newly hired nursing staff during a 10-year follow-up period

ScenarioScenario variant*LBP incidence (%)ORAnnual prevalence of LBP (%)Annual MSD injury claims per 100 workers
Without lifting devicesWith lifting devicesWithout lifting devicesWith lifting devices
Baseline scenarioRealistic: PIF=0.06252.0741.940.55.85.6
Maximum: PIF=0.38252.0741.931.45.84.3
Second scenarioRealistic: PIF=0.06202.0736.735.35.14.9
Maximum: PIF=0.38202.0736.726.85.13.7
Realistic: PIF=0.06302.0746.244.86.46.2
Maximum: PIF=0.38302.0746.235.46.44.9
Third scenarioRealistic: PIF=0.04251.6541.940.95.85.6
Maximum: PIF=0.27251.6541.934.85.84.8
Realistic: PIF=0.07252.5041.940.25.85.5
Maximum: PIF=0.46252.5041.928.55.83.9
  • *The realistic scenario reflects pooled estimates from observational and experimental studies, while the maximum scenario reflects the maximum gain with complete elimination of manual lifting of patients.

  • LBP, low back pain; MSD, musculoskeletal disorder; PIF, potential impact fraction.