Table 2 Associations of perceived procedural, interactional and total organisational justice at baseline with heavy drinking at follow-up
nOdds ratio (95% CI) adjusted for
Sex, age, SES and marital status (A)A+baseline heavy drinking and psychological distress (B)B+job strain and ERI (C)
15 290
Procedural justice
    High5191111
    Medium47131.04 (0.91 to 1.18)1.07 (0.92 to 1.24)1.08 (0.93 to 1.26)
    Low53861.23 (1.09 to 1.39)1.13 (0.97 to 1.30)1.16 (1.00 to 1.35)
Interactional justice
    High5457111
    Medium45621.04 (0.91 to 1.18)1.01 (0.87 to 1.17)1.02 (0.88 to 1.19)
    Low52711.19 (1.05 to 1.34)1.05 (0.91 to 1.22)1.08 (0.93 to 1.25)
Total justice
    High5349111
    Medium47491.11 (0.98 to 1.26)1.08 (0.93 to 1.26)1.10 (0.95 to 1.28)
    Low51921.23 (1.09 to 1.40)1.07 (0.93 to 1.24)1.10 (0.95 to 1.29)
  • Adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) from multilevel logistic regression models are shown (n = 15 290).

  • ERI, effort/reward imbalance; SES, socio-economic status.