Table 3

 Cumulative incidence of upper extremity disorders on physical examination; risk ratios (95% CI) from multivariate Cox regression models; automotive stamping and engine plant workers, Detroit, MI, 1993–94

Model 1Model 2
All workers at risk (n = 459)Workers with no job change during follow up period (n = 335)
Exposure index quartile (1–4)1.5 (1.0 to 2.2)1.5 (1.1 to 2.2)
Gender (female/male)1.4 (0.7 to 2.7)1.1 (0.4 to 3.0)
Upper extremity injury (yes/no)1.4 (0.8 to 2.4)1.8 (0.9 to 3.5)
Baseline physical examination findings (yes/no)1.7 (1.0 to 3.0)1.6 (0.8 to 3.2)
High demand/low control (yes/no)1.5 (0.8 to 2.8)1.7 (0.8 to 3.6)
High body mass index (≥26 v <26)1.5 (0.9 to 2.7)1.6 (0.8 to 3.2)
Job change at follow up (yes/no)4.8 (1.5 to 15.4)
Exposure score × job change0.5 (0.2 to 0.9)
Model p value from likelihood ratio test0.010.02