Hazard ratios and 95% CI of MI by dimensions of psychosocial working conditions, based on 9130 men and 7086 women from the Copenhagen Centre for Prospective Population Studies
| Decision authority* | Skill discretion* | Social support* | Demand*† | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | (95% CI) | HR | (95% CI) | HR | (95% CI) | HR | (95% CI) | |
| *Adjusted for cohort of investigation, age, cohabitation, and sex, as described in the text. | ||||||||
| †For “demand”, lowest quartile is reference and 4th quartile is highest. | ||||||||
| 1. quartile (highest) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 2. quartile | 1.08 | (0.86 to 1.36) | 1.35 | (1.08 to 1.71) | 1.32 | (1.00 to 1.73) | 1.09 | (0.88 to 1.35) |
| 3. quartile | 1.11 | (0.91 to 1.36) | 1.28 | (1.04 to 1.58) | 1.11 | (0.84 to 1.47) | 1.05 | (0.85 to 1.30) |
| 4. quartile (lowest) | 1.26 | (1.04 to 1.54) | 1.52 | (1.22 to 1.89) | 1.12 | (0.84 to 1.48) | 1.01 | (0.82 to 1.25) |