Investigations of exposure to CO and NO2 in enclosed ice rinks
Study (ref No) | Type of study | Identified risk factors | Key health effects or attack rate | Biomonitoring CO, NO2, and key findings | Author recommendations | Follow up |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EpI, epidemiological investigation; EnI, environmental investigation; MIR, malfunctioning ice resurfacing machine; gIR, gasoline resurfacing machine; pIR, propane resurfacing machine; eIR, electric resurfacing machine; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; IV, inadequate ventilation; RMIR, regular maintenance of ice resurfacing machine; ICM, install catalytic muffler; ReIR, replace with electric ice resurfacing machine; AV, adequate ventilation; ARI, NO2-induced acute respiratory illness; Haem, NO2 induced haemoptysis; COP, carbon monoxide poisoning; QT, qualified technican. | ||||||
1 | EnI or EpI | MIR, IV | COP | Range: 25–50 ppm CO | ↓ Standards for indoor air quality | ? |
2 | EnI or EpI | gIR and pIR | COP | After incident 100 ppm CO | Adjust air fuel mixture, | ? |
Warm up gIR and pIR, | ||||||
Shorten resurfacings, | ||||||
↓ No of resurfacings | ||||||
3 | EnI or medical reports | MIR, IV | ARI | After incident 3 ppm NO2 | Long exhaust pipe, | ? |
Temperature inversion maintained high | RMIR, ICM, AV | |||||
↑ Exposure time, | ||||||
↑ Probability of poisoning | ||||||
4 | EnI/EpI | MIR, IV | ARI 69%, Haem 20% | After incident 3–4 ppm NO2 | Routine monitoring | ? |
5 | EnI or clinical investigation | MIR, IV | COP | After incident 100 ppm CO | RMIR, AV, ReIR, | After AV 23 ppm CO |
Rink employees | After warning signs, | After ReIR 1 ppm CO | ||||
Routine monitoring, | ||||||
↓ Standards for indoor air quality | ||||||
6 | EnI or EpI | MIR | COP | After incident 100 ppm CO | AV, RMIR | After ICM, RMIR 5–10 ppm CO |
QT | ||||||
7 | EnI or clinical investigation | MIR, IV | ARI | After incident 4 ppm NO2 | ? | ? |
8 | EnI or EpI | MIR, IV | COP, Team A 100%, | After incident 47 ppm CO | AV | ? |
Team B 83% | ||||||
Medical personnel 100% | ||||||
Referees 50% | ||||||
9 | EnI or EpI | MpIR, IV | ARI 55.6% | After incident 1250 ppb NO2 | AV, ReIR, | ? |
↑ Risk of pulmonary symptoms with ↑ time on ice | Routine monitoring | |||||
Set guidelines for air quality | ||||||
10 | EnI or EpI | MIR, IV | NO2 induced severe symptoms 82%, | After incident range: 0.5–1 ppm NO2 | AV, ReIR, RMIR | ? |
Mild symptoms 100% | ||||||
11 | EnI or EpI | MIR, IV | COP 54% players, | After incident 40 ppm CO | ? | ? |
Coaches, teachers | ||||||
12 | EnI or clinical investigation | MIR, IV | ARI 48% players | After incident 150 ppm CO | AV, ReIR, RMIR | ? |
Spectators | After incident 1.5 ppm NO2 | Education of staff | ||||
13 | EnI 20 rinks | MIR, IV | ? | 73 ppm CO | RMIR, ReIR, AV | ? |
0.1 ppm NO2 | ||||||
↑ No of resurfacings | ||||||
↑ CO | ||||||
Rinks varied in CO | ||||||
14 | EnI | MIR, IV | ? | 4240 ppb NO2 | Lower NO2 | ? |
1 hour maximal | ||||||
Increased NO2 | ||||||
15 | EnI 332 rinks | MIR, IV | ? | 40% rinks ↑ NO2 | ReIR | ? |
16 | EnI 70 rinks | MIR | ? | Indoor NO2 10× v outdoor | Long exhaust pipe | ? |
60% Exceeded standards | AV, | |||||
1 hour standard | ↓No of resurfacings | |||||
40% Exceeded standards | ||||||
1 week average standard | ||||||
1 week average 180 ppb NO2 | ||||||
17 | EnI 70 rinks | MIR | ? | Outdoor rink = 16.3 ppb NO2 | Set guidelines for air quality | ? |
Indoor rink = 169.5 ppb NO2 | AV, ReIR | |||||
Indoor NO2 10× v outdoor | ||||||
NO2 higher in rinks with IV | ||||||
18 | EnI or clinical investigation | MIR, IV | ↑ COHb | Range: 55–65 ppm CO | RMIR, QT | ? |
Rink employees | Fresh air supply to inside rink | |||||
Direct exhaust link from garage to outside | ||||||
19 | EnI seven rinks | MIR, IV | ? | Range: 3–57 ppm CO | Shorten resurfacings, | ? |
Ventilation system not in operation during resurfacings | AV, ReIR, RMIR | |||||
Routine monitoring | ||||||
20 | EnI or EpI | MIR | ? | 50% of rinks exceeded 25 ppm CO, | Routine monitoring | ? |
Range: 25–206 ppm CO, | QT, AV | |||||
Ventilation system not in operation during resurfacings | ||||||
21 | EnI six rinks | gIR and pIR, IV | ? | gIR range: 157–304 ppm CO | ICM, AV, ReIR | After ICM |
pIR range: 75–175 ppm CO | gIR range: 4–110 ppm CO | |||||
pIR range: 0–105 ppm CO | ||||||
22 | EpI | Tobacco smoke | ? | 1110–1700 ppm CO2 | ? | ? |
237 ppb NO2 | ||||||
23 | EnI or clinical investigation | MIR | ARI | Increased NO2 | Corticosteroid treatment | Condition improved |
24 | EnI four rinks | MIR, IV | ? | Range: 5–110 ppm CO | AV, ReIR, ICM, RMIR, | ? |
22.5 ppm caused various CO symptoms | Warm up machine, | |||||
Shorten resurfacings, | ||||||
Open doors of rink, | ||||||
During resurfacings, QT, | ||||||
Routine monitoring | ||||||
25 | EnI six rinks | MIR | ? | Range: 4–117 ppm CO | 1 hour maximal | ? |
Range: 342–2729 ppb NO2 | Allowable 20 ppm CO and 25 ppb NO2 | |||||
Outdoor = 37 ppb NO2 | ||||||
26 | EnI | MIR | ? | 1 week average | AV, ReIR, | Engineering controls: AV ↓ NO2 65% |
pIR: 206 ppb NO2 | ICM, RMIR | |||||
gIR: 132 ppb NO2 | Routine monitoring | |||||
eIR: 37 ppb NO2 | ||||||
27 | Exposure-absoption | ? | ? | Linear exposure-absoption relation | ↓ CO in rinks | ? |
28 | Exposure-absoption 10 rinks | MIR | ? | Range: 1.6–131.5 ppm CO | CO standard of 20 ppm for 90 minutes in rinks | ? |
↑ 10 ppm CO = ↑ COHb 1% | ||||||
29 | EnI | MIR, IV | ? | Increased CO | AV, long exhaust pipe | ? |
RMIR, ICM, QT | ||||||
Open doors of rink during resurfacings, | ||||||
Warm up machine, | ||||||
Flexible exhaust hose with direct link to outside | ||||||
30 | EnI | MIR | ? | 1 hour average | ↑ CO gIR | ? |
17–29 ppm CO | ↑ NO2 pIR | |||||
0.14–3.96 ppm NO2 | ||||||
31 | EnI | MIR | ? | 23% Exceeded standards | Enforce regulations | ? |
32 | EnI | MIR, IV | ? | Range: 50–100 ppm CO | Routine monitoring | After RMIR, AV 2–3 ppm CO |
33 | EnI or EpI six rinks | MIR, IV | 5×COHb | 82% Exceeded standards | RMIR, AV, ReIR | ? |
Range: 23–90 ppm CO |