Table 5

Summary of epidemiological effect measures on occupational risk of Lyme disease from 10 published studies of high or moderate use*

SeroprevalenceClinical prevalenceClinical incidence
StudyStudy group (%)Control group (%)OR (95% CI)Study group (%)Control group (%)OR (95% CI)Study group (%)Control group (%)RR (95% CI)
*NR, not reported; NA, not applicable; NC, not calculable; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; †calculated with Intercooled Stata, version 6; ‡Data represents reported seroconversion. During the study, one case of Lyme disease was reported in the comparison group; §data were reported for two years, and thus represents a two-year cumulative incidence; ¶historical comparison group; **the prevalence of symptomatic disease was 1.9% for definite disease and 3.1% for probable disease; ††IgG and IgM activity to four different antigens were used, range reported is IgG only; ‡‡control data using IgG reactivity only, derived from Hauser et al 1998, table 123; §§lifetime prevalence; for Zhioua et al,22 the prevalence was for probable disease only.
High use studies (n=2)
    Kuiper et al 199331285.07.1 (3.2 to 15.8)†5.5NRNA0.0NRNA
    Vos et al 199435NRNRNANRNRNA0.9‡2.2‡0.4 (0.1 to 1.2)†
Moderate use studies (n=8)
    Bowen et al 198448NRNRNANANANA3.8§0.8§4.9 (1.9 to 12.6)†
    Chmielewska-Badora 19983638.669.9 (2.6 to 36.8)†0.40.0NCNANANA
28.16.1 (1.8 to 20.4)†
    Fahrer et al 199840NRNRNANRNRNA0.80.8¶1.0
    Fahrer et al 19914126.13.98.6 (2.1 to 35.8)†1.9–3.1**NRNA0.8NRNA
6.05.5 (1.7 to 17.9)†
    Gustafson et al 199339919.3 (3.6 to 24.2)†6.0§§1.3§§4.8 (1.1 to 20.6)†NANANA
90.9 (0.5 to 1.8)†
    Hauser et al 19982341.0 to 44.8††8‡‡8.4 (4.4 to 15.9)†NRNRNANANANA
    Kuiper et al 19913219.76.33.7 (1.5 to 9.7)6.0NRNANANANA
    Zhioua et al 19972215.23.25.4 (0.7 to 40.7)†3.3§§NRNANANANA