Table 3

Categorisation of articles according to criteria for use in assessing occupational risk of Lyme disease

Usen (%*)Study designAuthor
*Of total of 41 reviewed studies; †retrospective cohort included with prospective group for analysis; ‡follow up study for Fahrer et al 1991; §control data supplied by Christiann et al 1997.57
High2 (4.9)ProspectiveKuiper et al 199331; Vos et al 199435
Moderate8 (19.5)Case-controlHauser et al 199823
Cross sectionalChmielewska-Badora 199836; Gustafson et al 199339; Kuiper et al 199132; Zhioua et al 199722
ProspectiveBowen et al 198448†; Fahrer et al 199840‡; Fahrer et al 199141
Low14 (34.1)Case-controlStanchi and Balague 199317; Christiann et al 199621§
Cross sectionalArteaga et al 199837; Baird et al 198942; Reese and Axford 199446; Robertson et al 199825; Smith et al 198855; Goldstein et al 199049; Schwartz et al 199353; Schwartz and Goldstein 19909
Prospectivevan Charante et al 199833; van Charante et al 199434; Oksi and Viljanen 199520; Rath et al 199624
None17 (41.5)Case-controlLey et al 199552
Case seriesGregory et al 199343; Golubic et al 199819; Klein 199550;
Cross sectionalGuy et al 198944; Ikushima et al 199928; Morgan et al 198945; Nakama et al 199429; Nuti et al 199326; Oteo et al 199238; Santino et al 199827; Schmutzhard et al 198828;
ProspectiveLane et al 199251; Montejunas et al 199430; Parrott et al 19937; Schwartz et al 199454; Thomas et al 199847