PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rhodes, Sarah
AU  - Demou, Evangelia
AU  - Wilkinson, Jack
AU  - Cherrie, Mark
AU  - Edge, Rhiannon
AU  - Gittins, Matthew
AU  - Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
AU  - Kromydas, Theocharis
AU  - Mueller, William
AU  - Pearce, Neil
AU  - van Tongeren, Martie
TI  - Potential contribution of vaccination uptake to occupational differences in risk of SARS-CoV-2: analysis of the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey
AID  - 10.1136/oemed-2023-108931
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - Occupational and Environmental Medicine
PG  - 34--39
VI  - 81
IP  - 1
4099  - http://oem.bmj.com/content/81/1/34.short
4100  - http://oem.bmj.com/content/81/1/34.full
SO  - Occup Environ Med2024 Jan 01; 81
AB  - Objectives To assess variation in vaccination uptake across occupational groups as a potential explanation for variation in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Design We analysed data from the UK Office of National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey linked to vaccination data from the National Immunisation Management System in England from 1 December 2020 to 11 May 2022. We analysed vaccination uptake and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by occupational group and assessed whether adjustment for vaccination reduced the variation in risk between occupational groups.Results Estimated rates of triple vaccination were high across all occupational groups (80% or above), but were lowest for food processing (80%), personal care (82%), hospitality (83%), manual occupations (84%) and retail (85%). High rates were observed for individuals working in health (95% for office based, 92% for those in patient-facing roles) and education (91%) and office-based workers not included in other categories (90%). The impact of adjusting for vaccination when estimating relative risks of infection was generally modest (ratio of hazard ratios across all occupational groups reduced from 1.37 to 1.32), but was consistent with the hypothesis that low vaccination rates contribute to elevated risk in some groups.Conclusions Variation in vaccination coverage might account for a modest proportion of occupational differences in infection risk. Vaccination rates were uniformly very high in this cohort, which may suggest that the participants are not representative of the general population. Accordingly, these results should be considered tentative pending the accumulation of additional evidence.Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publically available. Office of National Statistics (ONS) Coronavirus Infection Survey data can be accessed only by researchers who are ONS accredited researchers. Researchers can apply for accreditation through the Research Accreditation Service. Access is through the Secure Research Service and approved on a project basis. For further details, see: https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/whatwedo/statistics/requestingstatistics/approvedresearcherscheme.