TY - JOUR T1 - Mental health service use among Canadian veterans within the first 5 years following service: methodological considerations for comparisons with the general population JF - Occupational and Environmental Medicine JO - Occup Environ Med DO - 10.1136/oemed-2022-108772 SP - oemed-2022-108772 AU - Kate St.Cyr AU - Paul Kurdyak AU - Peter M Smith AU - Alyson L Mahar Y1 - 2023/05/25 UR - http://oem.bmj.com/content/early/2023/05/24/oemed-2022-108772.abstract N2 - Introduction Previous research comparing veteran and civilian mental health (MH) outcomes often assumes stable rates of MH service use over time and relies on standardisation or restriction to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. We aimed to explore the stability of MH service use in the first 5 years following release from the Canadian Armed Forces and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and to demonstrate the impact of using increasingly stringent matching criteria on effect estimates when comparing veterans with civilians, using incident outpatient MH encounters as an example.Methods We used administrative healthcare data from veterans and civilians residing in Ontario, Canada to create three hard-matched civilian cohorts: (1) age and sex; (2) age, sex and region of residence; and (3) age, sex, region of residence and median neighbourhood income quintile, while excluding civilians with a history of long-term care or rehabilitation stay or receipt of disability/income support payments. Extended Cox models were used to estimate time-dependent HRs.Results Across all cohorts, time-dependent analyses suggested that veterans had a significantly higher hazard of an outpatient MH encounter within the first 3 years of follow-up than civilians, but differences were attenuated in years 4–5. More stringent matching decreased baseline differences in unmatched variables and shifted the effect estimates, while sex-stratified analyses revealed stronger effects among women compared with men.Conclusions This methods-focused study demonstrates the implications of several study design decisions that should be considered when conducting comparative veteran and civilian health research.Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The data set from this study is held securely in coded form at ICES. While legal data sharing agreements between ICES and data providers (eg, healthcare organisations and government) prohibit ICES from making the data set publicly available, access may be granted to those who meet prespecified criteria for confidential access, available at www.ices.on.ca/DAS (email: das@ices.on.ca). ER -