RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Variability in audiometric recording
JF British Journal of Industrial Medicine
JO Br J Ind Med
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP 432
OP 435
DO 10.1136/oem.29.4.432
VO 29
IS 4
A1 Howell, R. W.
A1 Hartley, B. P. R.
YR 1972
UL http://oem.bmj.com/content/29/4/432.abstract
AB Howell, R. W., and Hartley, B. P. R. (1972).Brit. J. industr. Med.,29, 432-435. Variability in audiometric recording. A study of initial and repeat audiograms by two operators on 143 young male new entrants to industry (free of previous occupational exposure) has shown that mean values (mean of both ears, readings at 3 and 4 kHz) differed significantly between operators, and that this difference was not attributable to transient medical conditions such as wax in the ears or temporary infection. For nearly half the employees, the difference between the results obtained by the two operators amounted to 5 dB or more, with differences up to and including 21¼ dB. Of the two operators' lists of men in the lowest decile of hearing threshold levels, only half the names were common to both operators; there was clearly wide variation between the operators. With such variability in audiometric recording, some of which may be attributable to variation in the patients' responses, it seems unlikely that small changes in recorded hearing levels will give confident early indication of deterioration in a susceptible ear. It is suggested that further studies be carried out under industrial conditions to ascertain the advantages, if any, of two or more readings taken at one session (or within a short space of time) over single observations. Similar studies are needed using self-recording audiometry. Consideration should be given to the basic training and potential of operators, to the need for monitoring their performance, and to periodic refresher training where appropriate.