Self-report of duration of computer use is usually overestimated. The
search for a valid measure of exposure to keyboard/mouse use resulted in
the development of a computer registration software. The use of this new
software generated unexpected results when IJmker et al.1 found software-
recorded computer use was not significantly associated with upper
extremity/neck symptom onset while self-reported computer use was
sig...
Self-report of duration of computer use is usually overestimated. The
search for a valid measure of exposure to keyboard/mouse use resulted in
the development of a computer registration software. The use of this new
software generated unexpected results when IJmker et al.1 found software-
recorded computer use was not significantly associated with upper
extremity/neck symptom onset while self-reported computer use was
signficantly associated with symptoms in the neck/shoulder and arm/hand.
What is captured in the self-report that is missing in the software-
recorded duration of computer use? In the editorial by Gerr and Fethke2
reference is made to work by Homan and Armstrong3 that noted the potential
negative effect of time spent with hands held over the keyboard but
without keying. In our Medical-Ergonomic Program4 we refer to this
position as the 'action ready' posture when the forearm(s) is in full
pronation over the keyboard or mouse causing muscle activation of the
forearm extensor muscles. This may lead to the development of painful
trigger points in the forearm extensor muscles, a common area of
complaints by computer users.4 Activities such as reading, talking,
thinking etc. while using the computer are frequently accompanied by this
'action ready' posture. Time spent in these activities is included when
self-reporting duration of computer use but would not be captured in
computer registration software.
Other posture issues without keystrokes or mouse clicks involve the
neck/shoulder area. Computer users have a habit of not sitting up
straight against the back of the chair and carry their shoulders forward.
This posture activates the muscles involved with scapulae stabilization
and shortens the pectoralis minor4 resulting in painful trigger points in
the overused muscles . Neck/shoulder muscles are also activated when mouse
use is with the arm extended away from the body, when the monitor is too
far away and the chin juts forward or when the keyboard is too high and
the shoulders remain hiked to compensate. Maintenance of these postures
with or without keystrokes and mouse clicks are an etiology for upper
extremity symptoms that needs to be added to the exposure equation for
computer use.
1. IJmker S, Huysmans MA, van der Beek AJ, et al. Software-recorder
and self-reported duration of computer use in relation to the onset of
severe arm-wrist-hand pain and neck-shoulder pain. Occup Environ Med
2011;68:502-209.
2. Gerr F and Fethke N. Ascertaining computer use in studies of
musculoskeletal outcomes among computer workers: differences between self-
report and computer registration software. Occup Environ Med 2011;68:465-
466.
3. Homan MM and Armstrong TJ. Evaluation of three methodologies for
assessing work activity during computer use. AIHA J (Fairfax, VA)
2003;64:48-55.
4. Bleecker ML, Celio MA, Barnes SK. A medical-ergonomic program for
symptomatic keyboard/mouse users. JOEM 2011;53:561-567.
Fujishiro et al.1 recently published data on the association of job
demands and control with carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT). The
joined effect of demands and control (strain) was analyzed by five
different strain definitions:
1. a quadrant term (median splits of demands and control),
2. combinations of tertiles of demands and control,
3. an additive term (demands minus control) ,
4. a quotient term (the ra...
Fujishiro et al.1 recently published data on the association of job
demands and control with carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT). The
joined effect of demands and control (strain) was analyzed by five
different strain definitions:
1. a quadrant term (median splits of demands and control),
2. combinations of tertiles of demands and control,
3. an additive term (demands minus control) ,
4. a quotient term (the ratio) and
5. a multiplicative term (the product).
The first three terms are linear combinations of demands and control,
which are less informative than the corresponding linear combination based
on regression analyses of the mutually adjusted effects of demands and
control. The quotient term implies interaction between demands and control
but does not examine if there is one, its size, form or statistical
significance. An effect of any of the first four strain terms may be due
to an effect of only one of the two factors. Why introduce a strain
measure of the joined effect of demands and control, if it may only
reflect the effect of one of these variables?
A parsimonious and informative way to examine the joined effect of demands
and control is regression analyses with demands, control and their
multiplicative term included as covariates. The authors published the
effects of the multiplicative term but not the main effects. These are
needed to evaluate the form of any interaction. The authors only
illustrate the form of the interaction by dichotomous combinations of
demands and control.
The authors interpret the interaction as confirmation of the job strain
theory because high job control protected against thick IMT, especially
among persons with high job demands. However, they overlook that high job
demands also protected against thick IMT. The interaction effect as a
whole was not in accordance with the job strain model.
References
1. Fujishiro K, Diez Roux AV, Landsbergis P, et al. Associations of
occupation, job control and job demands with intima-media thickness: The
Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Occup Environ Med
2011;68:319-326.
The article by Clin et al. (1) provides additional information for a
dose-response relationship with asbestos and cancer. Information where a
response curve changes effect as observed from background is critical in
establishing a safe exposure limit (threshold -exposure/concentration-
dose). Some investigators have reported this threshold is around 25
fiber/ml-years (2); although for some members of an exposed group thi...
The article by Clin et al. (1) provides additional information for a
dose-response relationship with asbestos and cancer. Information where a
response curve changes effect as observed from background is critical in
establishing a safe exposure limit (threshold -exposure/concentration-
dose). Some investigators have reported this threshold is around 25
fiber/ml-years (2); although for some members of an exposed group this may
be lower (3). However, a cumulative no-effect value does not provide
information applicable for practical every day use when monitoring worker
exposure.
Recent studies (4,5,6) have suggested levels of exposure where there
was no excess increase in cancer, notably lung cancer and mesothelioma.
This is especially noted for non-smokers where risk does not exceed unity
(lung cancer), even for high asbestos exposure, while there is a
significant increased risk for smokers and former smokers (6,7). Thus, it
appears smoking is the primary contributor and confounder of disease for
historical and current asbestos workers (6). Compounding this issue is
the high number of smokers performing asbestos abatement work
(approximately 60% or greater depending on the population observed even at
the present time) (8,9). The high rate of smoking makes it difficult to
estimate a threshold and subsequently establish an exposure value from
this type of information. Certainly, for today's asbestos workers smoking
constitutes their greatest risk (6,9,10).
Recent studies with direct (4,5) and indirect (e.g. Job Exposure Matrix
and Job Specific Modules) (6,11) exposure information do allow an estimate
of a threshold exposure dose. Although, exposure can greatly vary over
time (4), it appears even with mixed fiber exposure (chrysotile and
amphibole) (5) a threshold of 1.0 f/ml-year is applicable, but at the
upper range. If chrysotile alone is used in this estimate, it appears a
higher value would be warranted (5). Taken together, with a safety margin
to include a lower reported value in causation of asbestosis (about 23
f//ml - years) (11), a threshold of 0.8 f/ml-year would appear applicable
(20 f/ml - years). From this, using a work time period of 25 years, which
is not likely for asbestos workers in the United States, due to physical
demands of the occupation and actual length of the "industry", allows
suggestion for a threshold of 0.8 f/ml-Time Weighted Average. When
present exposure levels are included in this evaluation (12), it is
unlikely workers in developed nations will exceed a cumulative exposure of
20 or 25 fiber/ml-years. Comparison of this proposed threshold with data
reported by Clin et al., for lung cancer and mesothelioma, with 25 years
or less of exposure (table 1 in Clin et al.), provides support for this
threshold value. However, any value will be controversial, especially in
establishing a threshold.
References
1. Clin B, Morlais F, Launoy G, Guizard AV, Dubois B, Bouvier V,
Desoubeaux N, Marquignon MF, Raffaelli C, Paris C, Galateau-Salle F,
Guittet L, Letourneux M. Environ Occup Med 2011; First online March 15,
2011.
2. Lange JH. Emergence of a New Policy for Asbestos: A Result of the
World Trade Center Tragedy. Indoor and Built Environment 2004; 12:21-33.
3. Pierce JS, McKinley MA, Paustenbach DJ, Finley BL. An evaluation
of reported no-effect chrysotile asbestos exposures for lung cancer and
mesothelioma. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38:191-214.
4. Sichletidis L, Chloros D, Spyratos D, Haidich AB, Fourkiotou I,
Kakoura M, Patakas D. Mortality from occupational exposure to relatively
pure chrysotile: a 39-year study. Respiration. 2009;78:63-8.
5. Dodic Fikfak M, Kriebel D, Quinn MM, Eisen EA, Wegman DH. A case
control study of lung cancer and exposure to chrysotile and amphibole at a
slovenian asbestos-cement plant. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 51:261-8.
6. Frost G. The joint effect of asbestos exposure and smoking on the
risk of lung cancer mortality for asbestos workers (1971-2005). 2011;
Health & Safety Executive (HSE);
(http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr730.htm)
7. Frost G, Darnton A, Harding AH. The effect of smoking on the risk
of lung cancer mortality for asbestos workers in Great Britain (1971-
2005). Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 55:239-47.
8. Frost G, Harding AH, Darnton A, McElvenny D, Morgan D.
Occupational exposure to asbestos and mortality among asbestos removal
workers: a Poisson regression analysis. Br J Cancer. 2008 99:822-9.
9. Lange JH, Mastrangelo G, Buja A. Smoking and alcohol use in
asbestos abatement workers. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2006 77:338-42.
10. Harding A-H, Darnton A, Wegerdt J, McElvenny D. Mortality among
British asbestos workers undergoing regular medical examinations (1971-
2005). Occup Environ Med 2009;66487-495.
11. Mastrangelo G, Ballarin MN, Bellini E, Bicciato F, Zannol F,
Gioffr? F, Zedde A, Tessadri G, Fedeli U, Valentini F, Scoizzato L,
Marangi G, Lange JH. Asbestos exposure and benign asbestos diseases in 772
formerly exposed workers: dose-response relationships. Am J Ind Med 2009
52:596-602.
12. Lange JH, Sites SL, Mastrangelo G, Thomulka KW. Exposure to
airborne asbestos during abatement of ceiling material, window caulking,
floor tile, and roofing material. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2006 77:718-
22.
I have read with the greatest interest the convincing study on the
dose-response of cadmium ions in kidneys (1). Cadmium compounds also harm
the proteoglycan metabolism (2), and by using the urinary proteoglycan
excretion as an indicator of cadmium effects the threshold would be at 5
microg/g creatinine (3). This agrees very well with the threshold found in
the current investigation.
I have read with the greatest interest the convincing study on the
dose-response of cadmium ions in kidneys (1). Cadmium compounds also harm
the proteoglycan metabolism (2), and by using the urinary proteoglycan
excretion as an indicator of cadmium effects the threshold would be at 5
microg/g creatinine (3). This agrees very well with the threshold found in
the current investigation.
1 Chaumont A, De Winter F, Dumont X, et al. The threshold level of
urinary cadmium associated with increased urinary excretion of retinol-
binding protein and beta-2-microglobulin: a reassessment in a large cohort
of nickel cadmium battery workers. Occup Environ Med 2011; 68: 257-264
Gan et al, 2011 [1] concluded that long-term, occupational noise
exposure was associated with increased prevalence of coronary heart
disease (CHD), for which the authors report a clear exposure-response
relationship that was particularly strong for participants aged < 50
years, men and current smokers. We do not believe the results support
these conclusions, particularly in light of notable study limitations.
Gan et al, 2011 [1] concluded that long-term, occupational noise
exposure was associated with increased prevalence of coronary heart
disease (CHD), for which the authors report a clear exposure-response
relationship that was particularly strong for participants aged < 50
years, men and current smokers. We do not believe the results support
these conclusions, particularly in light of notable study limitations.
The cross-sectional design is a significant drawback. Self-reported
exposure and outcome data created uncertainty, regarding time ordering of
events. Additionally, exposed subjects had many well-known risk factors -
representing strong confounders - for cardiovascular disease (CVD)/CHD,
the effects of which cannot be entirely removed by statistical adjustment.
Moreover, unrecognized bias was likely introduced by including potential
causal intermediates and over-adjusting logistic models,[2] for which a
mechanistic basis is not well established. Although the authors dismissed
the presence of misclassification as non-differential, simulations have
shown this argument to be less persuasive.[3]
We raise additional concerns. First, heterogeneity of effect (Figure
2) precluded reporting summary estimates. It was incorrect to state, for
example, that an increased odds of CHD were observed particularly for men
when they were observed only for them. Second, the authors misapplied the
test for trend of a monotonic exposure-response relationship.[4] Finally,
potentially important effect patterns were obscured by aggregating
outcomes to ascertain CVD/CHD prevalence. CVD, the primary endpoint of
interest and the aggregate of six variables, was not discussed. The
significant association reported for CHD was largely driven by the
relatively strong association observed only for angina pectoris.
Given the prevalence of occupational noise exposure, even a modest
association would represent an important contributor to the development of
CVD/CHD. Unfortunately, Gan et al [1] does little to advance our
understanding of whether such an association exists, particularly because
the mechanism of action is so poorly understood. We agree with the authors
that cohort studies are warranted. These studies should use objective
exposure and outcome measurements.
References
1 Gan WQ, Davies HW, Demers PA. Exposure to occupational noise
exposure and cardiovascular disease in the United States: the National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004. Occup Environ Med
2010;68:183-190
2 Schisterman EF, Cole SR, Platt RW. Overadjustment bias and
unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology 2009;20:488
-495
3 Jurek AM, Greenland S, Maldonado G. How far from non-differential
does exposure or disease misclassification have to be to bias measures of
association away from the null? Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37:382-5
4 Maclure M, Greenland S. Tests for trend and dose response:
misinterpretations and alternatives. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:96-104
The publication of an editorial(1) and opposing commentaries(2,3)
underlines the profile OEM believes should be given to debate of the
proposal for observational epidemiologic studies and their protocols to be
registered in advance(4). I would however express my surprise that none
of these 3 offerings make mention of the workforce perspective in their
analyses of the issues. The editorial itself(1) and the commentary
o...
The publication of an editorial(1) and opposing commentaries(2,3)
underlines the profile OEM believes should be given to debate of the
proposal for observational epidemiologic studies and their protocols to be
registered in advance(4). I would however express my surprise that none
of these 3 offerings make mention of the workforce perspective in their
analyses of the issues. The editorial itself(1) and the commentary
opposing the protocol(3) do not make mention of workers at all, while the
pro-commentary(2) simply includes employees in a list of those involved in
collaboration to reduce difficulties in accessing data.
It may be possible to identify both pros and cons for the
registration proposal based on workforce issues, but to do so in this
letter would detract from its principal purpose in registering the
observation that these aspects have not been considered to date. Research
is a vital element of Occupational Health. OEM is the adopted official
Journal of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine of the Royal College of
Physicians (London). The Faculty first introduced a section dealing with
research in its ethical guidelines in 1999(5) identifying workers as key
customers of research, as well as identifying the need for clear and
detailed protocols, as well as worker consultation. As an Occupational
Physician, I am convinced that workers are owed a very real duty of care
in relation to research, whether there are clinical elements of the study
or not. The trauma and distress that research results publication and the
media response to such publication can cause a workforce, should not be
underestimated.
References
1 Loomis D. Journal Requirements to Register Observational Studies: OEM's
Policy. OEM 2011;68:83/4.
2 Rushton L. Should Protocols for Observational Research be Registered?
OEM 2011; 68:84-86.
3 Pearce N. Registration of Protocols for Observational Research is
Unnecessary and Would Do More Harm Than Good. OEM 2011; 68:86-88.
4 European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. Workshop
Report, number 18: Enhancement of the Scientific Process and Transparency
of Observational Studies, 2009.
5 The Faculty of Occupational Medicine Guidance on Ethics for Occupational
Physicians, 5th Edition, May 1999.
Dr. Burstyn, in his commentary (1), underscores the critical
importance of using the best exposure assessment methods possible to
minimize misclassification. We agree about the value of expert formulated
models for systematically and transparently documenting exposure
assessment1, but caution that many existing studies may not be readily
adapted to such model building. For such studies, the best alternative
exposure ass...
Dr. Burstyn, in his commentary (1), underscores the critical
importance of using the best exposure assessment methods possible to
minimize misclassification. We agree about the value of expert formulated
models for systematically and transparently documenting exposure
assessment1, but caution that many existing studies may not be readily
adapted to such model building. For such studies, the best alternative
exposure assessment methodology should be employed, such as job-exposure
matrices (JEMs) or expert assessments of self-reported work histories.
Even though the relationships between the true exposure and estimates by
expert assessment and a JEM are unknown (which is the case for most
exposure assessments) we believe that understanding the differences
between the two methods is informative, especially given the considerable
time and resources necessary to carry out an expert assessment.
As Dr. Burstyn indicates (1), neither assessment approach used in our
study (2) allows us to claim that lead definitely causes brain tumors.
However, if this is the standard for judging the success of an exposure
assessment method, most methods are failures. Although only suggestive, we
do see some evidence of an association and indicate that future studies
would benefit from the most accurate exposure assessment method available.
The intent of our analysis was to compare two widely used approaches and
to encourage epidemiologists to pursue the best exposure assessment
methods possible. We acknowledge limitations with the expert assessment
approach and strongly support the development and use of new exposure
assessment methods. However, expert assessment may be the best approach
available to an existing study and could reveal important associations
that future studies can explore in greater detail using more refined
exposure assessment techniques.
1. Burstyn I. The ghost of methods past: exposure assessment versus
job-exposure matrix studies. Occup Environ Med 2010.
2. Bhatti P, Stewart PA, Linet MS, Blair A, Inskip PD, Rajaraman P.
Comparison of occupational exposure assessment methods in a case-control
study of lead, genetic susceptibility and risk of adult brain tumours.
Occup Environ Med 2010.
We thank Dr Triebig for his interesting comments on our article ââ¬ÅOccupational exposure to solvents and risk of lymphoma subtypes: results from the Epilymph case-control studyââ¬ï¿½.1,2 Epidemiological evidence is growing about the various etiological factors of specific lymphoma subtypes, and perhaps the different mechanisms involved.3 In our paper, we referred to previous reports suggesting an interaction o...
We thank Dr Triebig for his interesting comments on our article ââ¬ÅOccupational exposure to solvents and risk of lymphoma subtypes: results from the Epilymph case-control studyââ¬ï¿½.1,2 Epidemiological evidence is growing about the various etiological factors of specific lymphoma subtypes, and perhaps the different mechanisms involved.3 In our paper, we referred to previous reports suggesting an interaction of occupational benzene exposure with familial history of haematological diseases and history of immune system diseases,4 apparently indicating an immune system disruption as a mechanism of lymphomagenesis among benzene-exposed workers. However, while those hypotheses apply to NHL in general, we did find a positive link with CLL and dubious findings for follicular lymphoma, but not with DLBCL. It is worth commenting that immune dysfunction is reportedly more relevant for DLBCL and marginal zone lymphoma than for CLL and follicular lymphoma.3 We also referred to benzene genotoxicity as a plausible mechanism, as several genotoxic effects of benzene, and particularly, long-arm deletion of chromosome 6 and trisomy of chromosomes 2, 4, 6, 11, 12, 14 and 18, also occur among lymphoma patients.5,6
The etiologic role of benzene is well established for non-lymphocytic leukaemia, and the recent IARC re-evaluation of human carcinogens in the Monographs N. 1-99 has raised the attention for future research on other neoplasms of the lymphohaemopoietic tissue.7 A variety of combinations of multifactorial factors might plausibly intervene in the chain of events leading to each individual subtype of lymphohaemopoietic malignancies. Whether this variety of aetiological patterns is reflected by excess risk in specific time windows since exposure onset is a question perhaps too early to answer. Nonetheless, we followed Dr Triebig suggestion and explored risk of B-cell lymphoma and CLL by year of initiating exposure, whether up to 1970, between 1971 and 1980, or from 1981 onwards. As the Epilymph study started at different times in the participating countries from 1996 onwards, the 10-15 years interval indicated by Dr Triebig would fit into the last time window. While no substantial changes in risk of B-cell lymphoma were observed by time window in all exposed and in those classified with the highest confidence of exposure to benzene, risk of CLL was highest among subjects who started exposure in 1971-1980 (all exposed: OR = 2.24, 95% CI 0.98 - 5.12; high confidence: OR = 3.33, 95% CI 1.01- 11.0), it was still elevated among those whose exposure started before 1970 (all exposed: OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.08 - 2.17; high confidence: OR = 1.52, 95% CI 0.97- 2.39), and it was not elevated among those who started exposure from 1981 onwards(all exposed: OR = 2.20, 95% CI 0.72 - 6.76; high confidence: OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.16- 10.2). It is worth mentioning that this last group included only a tiny fraction of the exposed, mainly because of the regulatory restrictions introduced in the ââ¬Ë70s. Also, subjects exposed to benzene from 1981 onwards might have been exposed to lower concentrations and for a shorter period; therefore, if cumulative dose over time were to be the correct indicator, the absence of effects might be accounted for by lower cumulative doses.
As it concerns risk associated with toluene and xylene exposure, Table 5 in our paper shows that the excess risk associated with toluene was mostly accounted for by co-occurrent exposure to benzene.2 On the other hand, the elevated risk associated with xylene exposure was generated by extremely small numbers with isolated exposure to xylene. We donââ¬â¢t feel confident to infer about toluene and xylene risk related to their genotoxicity, based on such poor epidemiological evidence.
Further time-related modelling of CLL risk as a function of dose of exposure to benzene, and proper stratification of overlapping exposures, would require pooled analyses of studies with high quality exposure data, an opportunity currently provided only by the Interlymph Consortium.
References
1. Triebig G. ââ¬ÅOccupational exposure to solvents and risk of lymphoma subtypes: results from the Epilymph case-control studyââ¬ï¿½. Occup Environ Med 2010; e-letter (published 7 September 2010)
2. Cocco P, tââ¬â¢Mannetje A, Fadda D, Melis M, Becker N, de Sanjoseô S, Foretova L, Mareckova J, Staines A, Kleefeld S, Maynadieô M, Nieters A, Brennan P, Boffetta P. exposure to solvents and risk of lymphoma subtypes: results from the Epilymph case-control study. Occup Environ Med 2010;67:341-347.
3. Morton LM, Wang SS, Cozen W, Chatterjee N, Davis S, Severson RK, Colt JS, Vasf MA, Rothman N, Blair A, Bernstein L, Croos AJ, DeRoos AJ, Engels EA, Hein DW, Hill DA, Kelemen LE, Lim U, Lynch CF, Schenk M, Wacholder S, Ward MH, Hoar Zahm S, Chanock SJ, Cerhan JR, Hartge P. Etiologic heterogeneity among non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. Blood 2008;112:5150-60.
4. Vineis P, Miligi L, Seniori Costantini A. Exposure to solvents and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: clues on putative mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:381-4.
5. Zhang L, Rothman N, Li G, Guo W, Yang W, Hubbard AE, Hayes RB, Yin S, Lu W, Smith MT. Aberrations in chromosomes associated with lymphoma and therapy-related leukemia in benzene-exposed workers. Environ Mol Mutagen 2007;48:467-74.
6. McHale CM, Lan Q, Corso C, Li G, Zhang L, Vermeulen R, Curry JD, Shen M, Turakulov R, Higuchi R, Germer S, Yin S, Rothman N, Smith MT.. Chromosome translocations in workers exposed to benzene. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2008;39:74-7.
7. Baan R, Grosse Y, Straif K, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Benbrahimm-Tallaa L, Guha N, Freeman C, Galichet L. A review of human carcinogens ââ¬â Part F: Chemical agents and related occupations. Lancet Oncology 2009;10:1143-4.
Conflict of Interest: None Declared
In his letter, Predicting chemicals causing cancer in animals as
human carcinogens (Occup Environ Med 2010;67:720), Huff surprisingly finds
opportunity to promote long-term carcinogenesis bioassays using animals in
response to an editorial by Suarthana et al (Occup Environ Med
2009;66:713e14), Predicting occupational diseases. In their editorial,
Suarthana et al generalize from the development of diagnostic models to
pred...
In his letter, Predicting chemicals causing cancer in animals as
human carcinogens (Occup Environ Med 2010;67:720), Huff surprisingly finds
opportunity to promote long-term carcinogenesis bioassays using animals in
response to an editorial by Suarthana et al (Occup Environ Med
2009;66:713e14), Predicting occupational diseases. In their editorial,
Suarthana et al generalize from the development of diagnostic models to
predict sensitisation to occupational allergens. Suarthana et al mention
no animal studies and conclude that "[t]here is now an opportunity to
develop prediction models for diverse occupational diseases, especially
given the existing large epidemiological studies."
Huff asserts that "findings from independently conducted bioassays on
the same chemicals are consistent[.]" In fact, a comparison of 121
bioassays from the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) database with
those in the published scientific literature found that the studies
produced consistent results only 57 percent of the time.[1] Huff also
claims that "less than10% of all chemicals if evaluated in bioassays would
be predicted to be carcinogenic." In our analysis of more than 500 NTP
bioassays, we show that more than half of the substances evaluated
produced evidence of carcinogenicity in at least one group of animals.[2]
The high false positive rate is thought to be an indirect effect of
increased cell proliferation in response to cell injury and death caused
by the near toxic doses of test substances used.[3] Huff observes that
there are more similarities than differences between rodents and humans.
However, well-characterized species-specific modes of action not operating
in humans also contribute to the high rate of false positives.[4]
The time has come for antiquated animal tests like the bioassay to be
abandoned in favor of modern, human-relevant methods such as the
epidemiological studies recommended in Suarthana et al's editorial, high-
throughput in vitro methods, and computational toxicology.
[1] Gottmann E, Kramer S, Pfahringer B, et al. Data quality in
predictive toxicology: reproducibility of rodent carcinogenicity
experiments. Environ Health Perspect 2001;109:509-14.
[2] PETA. Wasted money, wasted lives: A layperson's guide to the
problems with rodent cancer studies and the National Toxicology Program.
Norfolk, VA: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. 2006.
http://www.mediapeta.com/peta/pdf/Wasted-money-PDF.pdf (accessed 17 Sept
2010).
[3] Gaylor DW. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays
telling us what we need to know about carcinogens? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
2005;41:128-33.
[4] Cohen SM. Human carcinogenic risk evaluation: an alternative
approach to the two-year rodent bioassay. Toxicol Sci 2004;80:225-9.
Conflict of Interest:
Conflict of Interest:
The author is employed by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
Considering the temporal association between exposure to benzene and
the later development of leukaemia it is questionable if this phenomena is
also true for NHL.1 From several independent epidemiologic studies with
consistent findings it can be concluded, that 10 to 15 years after
exposure to benzene has been stopped, the risk of leukaemia is
significantly less or even absent.2,3,4
Considering the temporal association between exposure to benzene and
the later development of leukaemia it is questionable if this phenomena is
also true for NHL.1 From several independent epidemiologic studies with
consistent findings it can be concluded, that 10 to 15 years after
exposure to benzene has been stopped, the risk of leukaemia is
significantly less or even absent.2,3,4
Assuming that the underlying mechanism for leukaemia and NHL is the
same, it would be important to use the large database of the "Epilymph
study" to analyze the temporal pattern between exposure and disease.
The study found increased risks for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
after exposure to toluene and xylene. A benzene exposure was excluded.
These statistical associations must be discussed with respect to the
genotoxicologic evidence of these aromatic hydro-carbons. Compared to
benzene, toluene and xylene have not been proven as human carcinogens. The
IARC Working Group concluded in 1999, that there is inadequate evidence in
humans for the carcinogenicity of toluene and xylenes.5 Therefore the
associations must be interpreted with caution and do not support
causality.
Literature:
1. Triebig G. Implications of latency period between benzene exposure and
development of leukemia - a synopis of literature. Chem Biol Interact
2010; 184: 26-29.
2. Hayes RB, Song-Nian Yin, Dosemeci M. Benzene and the dose related
incidence of hematologic neoplasm in China. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89:
1065-1071.
3. Finkelstein MM. Leukemia after exposure to benzene: temporal trends and
implications for standards. Am J Ind Med 2000; 38: 1-7.
4. Glass DC, Sim MR, Fritschi L, Gray CN, Jolley DJ, Gibbons CG. Letter to
the editor. Leukemia risk and relvant benzene exposure period. Am J Ind
Med 2002; 42:481-489
5. IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Re-
evaluation of Some Organic Chemicals, Hydrazine and Hydrogen Peroxide.
Volume 71, Part two (Toluene) and Part three (Xylene). World Health
Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1999
Correspondence to:
Prof. Dr. G. Triebig, M.D., M.Sc.
Institute and Outpatient Clinic for
Occupational and Social Medicine
University of Heidelberg
Vossstr. 2
D-69115 Heidelberg
Germany
Tel.: ( 49) 6221 56 51 01
Fax: ( 49) 6221 56 29 91
Email: GTriebig@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Self-report of duration of computer use is usually overestimated. The search for a valid measure of exposure to keyboard/mouse use resulted in the development of a computer registration software. The use of this new software generated unexpected results when IJmker et al.1 found software- recorded computer use was not significantly associated with upper extremity/neck symptom onset while self-reported computer use was sig...
Fujishiro et al.1 recently published data on the association of job demands and control with carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT). The joined effect of demands and control (strain) was analyzed by five different strain definitions: 1. a quadrant term (median splits of demands and control), 2. combinations of tertiles of demands and control, 3. an additive term (demands minus control) , 4. a quotient term (the ra...
The article by Clin et al. (1) provides additional information for a dose-response relationship with asbestos and cancer. Information where a response curve changes effect as observed from background is critical in establishing a safe exposure limit (threshold -exposure/concentration- dose). Some investigators have reported this threshold is around 25 fiber/ml-years (2); although for some members of an exposed group thi...
Dear Editor,
I have read with the greatest interest the convincing study on the dose-response of cadmium ions in kidneys (1). Cadmium compounds also harm the proteoglycan metabolism (2), and by using the urinary proteoglycan excretion as an indicator of cadmium effects the threshold would be at 5 microg/g creatinine (3). This agrees very well with the threshold found in the current investigation.
1 Cha...
Gan et al, 2011 [1] concluded that long-term, occupational noise exposure was associated with increased prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD), for which the authors report a clear exposure-response relationship that was particularly strong for participants aged < 50 years, men and current smokers. We do not believe the results support these conclusions, particularly in light of notable study limitations.
...The publication of an editorial(1) and opposing commentaries(2,3) underlines the profile OEM believes should be given to debate of the proposal for observational epidemiologic studies and their protocols to be registered in advance(4). I would however express my surprise that none of these 3 offerings make mention of the workforce perspective in their analyses of the issues. The editorial itself(1) and the commentary o...
Dr. Burstyn, in his commentary (1), underscores the critical importance of using the best exposure assessment methods possible to minimize misclassification. We agree about the value of expert formulated models for systematically and transparently documenting exposure assessment1, but caution that many existing studies may not be readily adapted to such model building. For such studies, the best alternative exposure ass...
In his letter, Predicting chemicals causing cancer in animals as human carcinogens (Occup Environ Med 2010;67:720), Huff surprisingly finds opportunity to promote long-term carcinogenesis bioassays using animals in response to an editorial by Suarthana et al (Occup Environ Med 2009;66:713e14), Predicting occupational diseases. In their editorial, Suarthana et al generalize from the development of diagnostic models to pred...
Considering the temporal association between exposure to benzene and the later development of leukaemia it is questionable if this phenomena is also true for NHL.1 From several independent epidemiologic studies with consistent findings it can be concluded, that 10 to 15 years after exposure to benzene has been stopped, the risk of leukaemia is significantly less or even absent.2,3,4
Assuming that the underlying...
Pages