Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Four-year follow-up of surface contamination by antineoplastic drugs in a compounding unit
  1. Guillaume Saint-Lorant1,2,
  2. Michèle Vasseur1,3,
  3. Delphine Allorge4,5,
  4. Nicolas Beauval5,
  5. Nicolas Simon1,3,
  6. Pascal Odou1,3
  1. 1 ULR 7365—GRITA—Groupe de Recherche sur les Formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, University of Lille, Lille, France
  2. 2 Pharmacy, CHU Caen, Caen, France
  3. 3 Pharmacy, CHU Lille, Lille, France
  4. 4 ULR-4483-IMPECS-IMPact de l’Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine, University of Lille, Lille, France
  5. 5 CHRU, Lille, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Guillaume Saint-Lorant, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 7365 - GRITA - Groupe de Recherche sur les Formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, Univ Lille, Lille, France; saintlorant-g{at}chu-caen.fr

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to monitor the contamination by antineoplastic drugs on work surfaces in a compounding unit 4 years after its implementation.

Methods This descriptive study was done in a unit performing on average 45 000 preparations per year. Surface sampling points (N=23) were monitored monthly in the frame of routine activity from the opening of an anticancer drug compounding unit. Contamination with nine antineoplastic drugs (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, dacarbazine, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, gemcitabine, cytarabine, irinotecan and doxorubicin) was assessed on wipes with a local liquid chromatography coupled with a tandem mass spectrometer analysis. The contamination rate (CR, %) was prospectively monitored every month during the entire study period. The occurrence of critical incidents was also registered. The effect of each safety measure implemented during this period was also analysed.

Results Based on the 1104 samples collected between March 2016 and March 2020, the CR was 18.5%. If three different critical incidents among a vial breakage that occurred were individually considered, this CR was slightly lower than that in the literature. Eight months after opening and taking different corrective actions, the overall CR dropped from 42.39% to 11.52% (p<0.001). Contamination was limited to the area that includes the compounding room and, more precisely, the welder and the QC-Prep+ sampling points.

Conclusions From the beginning of the study and from month to month, surface contamination was limited to the nearest sampling points to the compounding unit. This 4-year monitoring study allowed us to determine the intravenous conventional antineoplastic drugs and sampling points to be focused on.

  • Environmental Exposure
  • Occupational Health
  • Public health
  • Health Personnel

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors GS-L is the guarantor. GS-L and NS wrote this short report. GS-L performed the experiments. NB performed analytical dosages and was involved in the conception of this short report. GS-L, MV, DA, NB, NS and PO designed the study, interpreted the data, made critical revisions and approved the final manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript as submitted.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.