Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Authors’ reply: ‘Response to: ‘Psychosocial job stressors and suicidality: a meta-analysis and systematic review’ by Milneret al’
  1. Allison Milner1,2,
  2. Katrina Witt3,
  3. Anthony D LaMontagne1,2,
  4. Isabelle Niedhammer4,5
  1. 1 Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2 Work, Health and Wellbeing Unit, Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3 Turning Point, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4 Epidemiology in Occupational Health and Ergonomics (ESTER) Team, INSERM, U1085, Research Institute for Environmental and Occupational Health (IRSET), Angers, France
  5. 5 Epidemiology in Occupational Health and Ergonomics (ESTER) Team, University of Angers, Angers, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Allison Milner, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; allison.milner{at}unimelb.edu.au

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We thank Professor Choi for his response to our paper ‘Psychosocial job stressors and suicidality: a meta-analysis and systematic review’.1

In his letter,2 Choi has pointed out a small problem, in that the results provided by Ostry et al 3 should actually be in the opposite direction. We appreciate him noting this problem regarding job demands. As underlined by Choi, these results further highlight the mixed findings regarding the relationship between job demands and suicide-related outcomes. We agree that these mixed findings may be resolved by more …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors AM conceived the response. All authors contributed to drafts and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles