Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Association of low-dose ionising radiation with site-specific solid cancers: Chinese medical X-ray workers cohort study, 1950–1995
  1. Yeqing Gu1,
  2. Jinhan Wang1,
  3. Yan Wang1,
  4. Chang Xu1,
  5. Yang Liu1,
  6. Liqing Du1,
  7. Qin Wang1,
  8. Kaihua Ji1,
  9. Ningning He1,
  10. Manman Zhang1,
  11. Huijuan Song1,
  12. Kaijun Niu1,2,
  13. Qiang Liu1
  1. 1 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Institute of Radiation Medicine, Tianjin, China
  2. 2 School of Public Health of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
  1. Correspondence to Professor Qiang Liu, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Institute of Radiation Medicine, Tianjin, China; liuqiang{at}irm-cams.ac.cn; Kaijun Niu; nkj0809{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background The dose–response relationship between cancers and protracted low-dose rate exposure to ionising radiation is still uncertain. This study aims to estimate quantified relationships between low-dose radiation exposures and site-specific solid cancers among Chinese medical X-ray workers.

Methods This cohort study included 27 011 individuals who were employed at major hospitals in 24 provinces in China from 1950 to 1980 and had been exposed to X-ray equipment, and a control group of 25 782 physicians who were not exposed to X-ray equipment. Person-years of follow-up were calculated from the year of employment to the date of the first diagnosis of cancer or the end of follow-up, whichever occurred first. All cancers were obtained from medical records during 1950–1995. This study used Poisson regression models to estimate the excess relative risk (ERR) and excess absolute risk (EAR) for incidence of site-specific solid cancers associated with cumulative dose.

Results 1643 solid cancers were developed, the most common being lung, liver and stomach cancer. Among X-ray workers, the average cumulative colon dose was 0.084 Gy. We found a positive relationship between cumulative organ-specific dose and liver (ERR/Gy=1.48; 95% CI 0.40 to 2.83), oesophagus (ERR/Gy=18.1; 95% CI 6.25 to 39.1), thyroid (ERR/Gy=2.96; 95% CI 0.44 to 8.18) and non-melanoma skin cancers (ERR/Gy=7.96; 95% CI 2.13 to 23.12). We found no significant relationship between cumulative organ-specific doses and other cancers. Moreover, the results showed a statistically significant EAR for liver, stomach, breast cancer (female), thyroid and non-melanoma skin cancers.

Conclusions These findings provided more useful insights into the risks of site-specific cancers from protracted low-dose rate exposure to ionising radiation.

  • epidemiology
  • radiation, ionizing
  • occupational health

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Data cannot be made publicly available because public availability would compromise participant privacy. For data access, researchers can contact the Institute of Radiation Medicine Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China (E-mail address: liuqiang@irm-cams.ac.cn).

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Data cannot be made publicly available because public availability would compromise participant privacy. For data access, researchers can contact the Institute of Radiation Medicine Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China (E-mail address: liuqiang@irm-cams.ac.cn).

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • YG and JW are joint first authors.

  • YG and JW contributed equally.

  • Contributors YG, JW, KN and QL contributed to the study conception and design; manuscript drafting; manuscript revising. YG, JW, YW, CX, YL, LD, QW, KJ, NH, MZ, HS, KN and QL contributed to data collection, assembly, analysis and interpretation of the data. QL accepts full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study as guarantor, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding This work was supported by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science (2021-I2M-1-042); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82103837, 31971168, 81972976, 32071241, 32171239 and 82072331).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.