Article Text

Download PDFPDF

O1C.6 Is adjustment for smoking needed in a cohort study of cancer mortality among chrysotile asbestos factory and mine workers?
Free
  1. Ann Olsson1,
  2. Madar Talibov1,
  3. Evgeny V Kovalevskiy2,
  4. Graham Byrnes1,
  5. Sara Schonfeld3,
  6. Eleonora Feletto4,
  7. Sergey V Kashanskiy5,
  8. Monika Moissonnier1,
  9. Evgenia Ostroumova1,
  10. Kurt Straif1,
  11. Hans Kromhout6,
  12. Igor V Bukhtiyarov2,
  13. Joachim Schüz1
  1. 1International Agency For Research On Cancer, Lyon, France
  2. 2Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health, Moscow, The Russian Federation
  3. 3National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Bethesda, USA
  4. 4Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, Australia
  5. 5Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, The Russian Federation
  6. 6Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Introduction A retrospective cohort study of 35 840 employees is currently being conducted in a chrysotile mine and its processing facilities in Asbest, the Russian Federation. The primary aim is to quantify exposure-response relationships for cancers potentially associated with chrysotile exposure. Some of those cancers are also tobacco-related; however individual-level information on tobacco use is not available for the full cohort. To address this gap, a cross-sectional study of current and retired workers from JSC Uralasbest was conducted to assess the relationship between smoking status and workers’ exposure to chrysotile.

Methods Self-administered questionnaires were completed by current workers during meetings organized by occupational safety specialists. Retired workers filled in questionnaires during Veterans’ meetings or were interviewed via telephone or at home. Estimates of exposure to chrysotile were available for 999 current and 3795 retired workers who were linked to the cohort study.

Results Among the 7451 respondents (n=3698 men and n=3753 women), 66% of men and 9% of women were ever-smokers. Smoking prevalence was stable across birth decades in men, but increased from <10% in women born before 1960 to 30% in women born after 1980. Among ever-smokers, men smoked more cigarettes per day than women. The smoking prevalence was similar in exposed and non-exposed men, and did not increase with exposure category. The greatest difference in the proportion of smokers among women was observed between non-exposed (4%) and all exposed categories combined (7.5%), whereas there was little variation across categories of exposure (7%–8%). Overall, the self-reported smoking prevalence may have been underestimated, especially in the older age categories due to survivor bias.

Conclusion While no adjustments for smoking among men appear necessary in the future analyses, including smoking propensity by birth cohort for women may be useful.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.