Article Text

Download PDFPDF

O1C.4 Cancer incidence among lead-exposed workers in two countries
Free
  1. Kyle Steenland1,
  2. Vaughn Barry1,
  3. Ahti Antilla2,
  4. Markku Sallmen3,
  5. Damien McElvenny4,
  6. Will Miller4,
  7. Peter Ritchie,
  8. Kurt Straif5
  1. 1Rollins School of Public Health, Emory U, Atlanta, USA
  2. 2Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
  4. 4Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinborough, UK
  5. 5International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France

Abstract

Introduction Inorganic lead is considered a probable carcinogen by IARC (brain, lung, and stomach).

Methods We conducted internal analyses via Cox regression of cancer incidence in two cohorts of lead-exposed workers with blood lead data (Finland, UK ), including almost 30 000 workers (20 752 in Finland and 9122 in the UK) and over 10 000 incident cancers. Our exposure metric was maximum annual blood lead (BL) test.

Results The combined cohort had a median maximum blood lead of 29 ug/dl, a mean first year BL test of 1977, and was 87% male. Forty-seven percent had more than 1 BL test. Significant (p<0.05) positive trends, using the log of each worker’s maximum BL, were found for brain cancer (malignant and benign combined), Hodgkins’s lymphoma, lung cancer, and rectal cancer, while significant negative trends were found for colon cancer and melanoma. A borderline significant positive trend (0.05≤p≤0.10) was found for esophageal cancer. Significant interactions by country were found only for lung cancer, with Finland showing a strong positive trend and the UK showing only a modest trend. However, in general trends were marked in Finland and weak or inconsistent in the UK.

Conclusions We found strong positive incidence trends with increasing blood lead level, for several outcomes in internal analysis. Two of these, lung and brain cancer, were a priori suspected sites. Two of these outcomes are associated with smoking (lung and esophageal cancer), for which we had no data; however, we had no a priori reason to believe smoking differed between workers with different BL levels.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.