Article Text

Download PDFPDF

O4B.2 Patterns and predictors of return to work after major trauma: a prospective, population based registry study
Free
  1. Alex Collie1,
  2. Pamela Simpson1,
  3. Peter Cameron1,
  4. Shanthi Ameratunga2,
  5. Jennie Ponsford1,
  6. Ronan Lyons3,
  7. Sandra Braaf1,
  8. Andrew Nunn4,
  9. James Harrison5,
  10. Belinda Gabbe1,3
  1. 1Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  2. 2University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  3. 3Swansea University, Swansea, UK
  4. 4Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
  5. 5Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

Abstract

Background Employment is an important marker of functional recovery from injury. There are few population-based studies of long-term employment outcomes, and limited data on the patterns of return to work post injury.

Objectives This study sought to characterise patterns of engagement in work over the four-year period following major traumatic injury, and to identify factors associated with those patterns.

Method We conducted a population-based, prospective cohort study using the Victorian State Trauma Registry. A total of 1086 working age individuals, in paid employment or full-time education before injury, were followed-up through telephone interview at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months post-injury. Responses to return to work (RTW) questions were used to define four discrete patterns: early and sustained; delayed; failed; no RTW. Predictors of RTW patterns were assessed using multivariate multinomial logistic regression.

Results Slightly more than half of respondents (51.6%) recorded early sustained RTW. A further 15.5% had delayed and 13.3% failed RTW. One in five (19.7%) did not RTW. Compared with early sustained RTW, predictors of delayed and no RTW included being in a manual occupation and injury in a motor vehicle accident. Older age and receiving compensation predicted both failed and no RTW patterns. Pre-injury disability was an additional predictor of failed RTW. Presence of co-morbidity was an additional predictor of no RTW.

Conclusions A range of personal, occupational, injury, health and compensation system factors influence RTW patterns after serious injury. Early identification of people at risk for delayed, failed or no RTW is needed so that targeted interventions can be delivered.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.